Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Learn to Build 14 Websites with 28 Hours of Instruction on HTML, JavaScript, MySQL & More for $14 ×
Medicine

Submission + - Scientific Jigsaw Puzzle: Fitting the pieces of the low-level radiation debate (sagepub.com)

Lasrick writes: Skip past the dry abstract to Jan Beyea's main article for a thorough exploration of what's wrong with current 'safe' levels of low-level radiation exposure. The Bulletin is just releasing its "Radiation Issue", which is available for free for 2 weeks. Explores how the NRC may be changing recommended safe dosages, and how the studies for prolonged exposure have, until recently, been based on one-time exposures (Hiroshima, etc New epidemiological studies on prolonged exposure (medical exposures, worker exposures, etc) are more accurate and tell a different tale. This is a long article, but reads well.
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Scientific Jigsaw Puzzle: Fitting the pieces of the low-level radiation debate

Comments Filter:

Science and religion are in full accord but science and faith are in complete discord.

Working...