Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Google

Submission + - What Is Google's Stance On Software Patents? (blogspot.com)

FlorianMueller writes: In a recent Slashdot discussion, a Linux evangelist from Google, Jeremy Allison, said that "Google submitted an anti-software patent brief in the Bilski case." He disclosed his affiliation and encouraged double-checking. I have performed a detailed analysis of Google's amicus curiae brief in re Bilski. While it cites some patent-critical literature, the document stops far short of advocating the abolition of software patents. The brief supports the idea that patent law should expand according to technological progress. It complains about some software patents being too abstract and others making only a "conventional" use of a computer, but under patent law, that doesn't mean that all software is conventional by definition. Google's own patents, such as the PageRank patent, are (at least intended to be) non-abstract and non-conventional. Is anyone aware of Google ever having spoken out against the patentability of all software, including the software Google itself patents every day?
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

What Is Google's Stance On Software Patents?

Comments Filter:

"History is a tool used by politicians to justify their intentions." -- Ted Koppel

Working...