Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Submission + - Can a Computer Finally Pass the Turing Test? (hplusmagazine.com) 2

An anonymous reader writes: "Why not develop music in ways unknown...? If beauty is present, it is present." That's Emily Howell talking — a music-composing computer program written in Lisp by a Santa Cruz professor. Classical musicians refuse to perform Emily's musical compositions, and the professor says they believe "the creation of music is innately human, and somehow this computer program was a threat...to that unique human aspect of creation." But Emily raises a disturbing question. With the ability to write music even classical purists can't distinguish from the compositions of humans, have we already reached the moment where a computer can pass for human? (The article includes a sample of her music, plus her intriguing haiku-like responses to queries. "I am not sad. I am not happy. I am Emily... Life and un-life exist. We coexist.")
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Can a Computer Finally Pass the Turing Test?

Comments Filter:
  • When a computer can understand why forum replies like "First post!!!!1" are so stupid, then they might have a chance at passing.
  • Neither of those citations sound like a normal person. They sound like either a computer or a whacked-out, pretentious art student. (The latter is probably also unable to pass the Turing Test).

    Computerized machines can build a nice car, and they can probably write a technically adequate symphony, but that doesn't mean they can think. At the end of the day, we know they can't. Intelligence is an emergent property that derives in part from lived experience in corporeal form. It won't be replicated by any

A bug in the code is worth two in the documentation.