Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses

Podcast Guests Are Paying Up To $50,000 To Appear on Popular Shows (bloomberg.com) 30

People will confess all sorts of things to podcasters, from their unpopular political beliefs or embarrassing romantic mishaps to their worst fears. But there's one revelation certain guests will never disclose -- namely, that they're paying thousands of dollars just to be interviewed on the show. From a report: Welcome to the golden era of pay-for-play podcasting, when guests pay handsomely to be interviewed for an entire episode. In exchange, the host gets some revenue, fills out the programming calendar, and might bag a future advertiser. Determining exactly how widespread the practice is can be tricky. Disclosures, if included at all, might last only a few fleeting seconds in an hourlong interview, and various hosts use different language to describe the nature of such relationships. What percentage of shows accepts payment in exchange for airtime is also difficult to say. According to nearly a dozen interviews with industry sources, it appears the practice is particularly popular among podcasts in the wellness, cryptocurrency, and business arenas.

In an age when social media influencers routinely get paid for mentioning a brand in an Instagram post or YouTube video, this marriage of convenience shouldn't come as a complete shock. Still, not everyone thinks it's a good idea. "As someone who's making money for that type of advertorial content, it should be disclosed," says Craig Delsack, a New York-based media lawyer. "It's just good practice and builds trust with the podcaster. It can't be the Wild West." US regulators also agree that consumers might be misled when they don't know a media mention only occurred in exchange for compensation. Even so, the phenomenon appears to be thriving in podcasting. Online platform Guestio has raised more than $1 million to build a marketplace devoted entirely to brokering paid guest appearances. On Guestio, the flow of money sometimes reverses direction, and a podcaster provides payment to land a particularly coveted guest such as boxer Manny Pacquiao, who charges $15,000 for an appearance.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Podcast Guests Are Paying Up To $50,000 To Appear on Popular Shows

Comments Filter:
  • Man I'm old (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Wednesday August 03, 2022 @09:11AM (#62758770)
    we just called this payola back in my day. Everything old is new again.
    • Hahaha yup. Shocking - people are spending money on marketing lol
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        The fact that corruption is common doesn't mean we shouldn't be talking about it. Undisclosed advertising in media is evil. I don't think there should be a law, but someone should be doing the undercover journalism thing to prove which podcasters and other "influencers" are doing this so we can all ignore them.
        • The fact that corruption is common doesn't mean we shouldn't be talking about it. Undisclosed advertising in media is evil. I don't think there should be a law, but someone should be doing the undercover journalism thing to prove which podcasters and other "influencers" are doing this so we can all ignore them.

          One thing with a new field is they start re-inventing everything from scratch. Often this is great and leads to innovation, but they also re-invent the ethics and that tends to create some really sketchy behaviour.

          Even without laws I doubt you'd get much payola in radio anymore, there's just too wide an understanding that it's wrong. But podcasts? It's a lot easier to convince yourself that you're not doing something wrong.

          • by cstacy ( 534252 )

            When it was OTA broadcasting, a factor was that the public owns the (extremely limited) spectrum, and therefore could regulate it.

            Regulation of private media is an entirely different matter, and also the way it works (who is getting paid for what exactly) seems different to me. However, the ethics are exactly the same in my opinion. Most media, even Slashdot, does COI disclosures in articles for example.

        • I get what you're trying to do. You're trying to take an issue of fraud and leave it to the free market but I don't think that's going to work. Let's say you start a successful newspaper that goes after people like this. It's pretty dry reading and it's not going to pay the bills. So let's say you include some tabloid journalism to actually move papers while also doing real journalism in your pages. So far so good right?

          This is exactly what Gawker did. Tabloid journalism to pay the bills for the real jo
    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      It's more like those TV shows where they have someone on for an "interview", but it's really just an advert for the thing they are selling. New movie they are in, book they just published.

      One of the differences with podcasts is that it's not always done just to hawk some new thing they are selling, these days it's as likely to be an opportunity to get their rhetoric over. They are promoting themselves or their ideas as a brand, and maybe they have their own podcast, or are standing for election, or make mon

  • Now they just have a new name.
  • Maybe (Score:2, Interesting)

    by beepsky ( 6008348 )
    The only podcasts I watch are Joe Rogan and Lex Fridman and I doubt either of them do that. They both only talk to people they want to talk to
    • Re: (Score:1, Insightful)

      by joerdie ( 816174 )
      Cool story bro?
    • The only podcasts I watch are Joe Rogan

      If I want to hear opinions from insufferable prats, I come to slashdot. The great thing is that works for you too.

    • I guarantee you Joe Rogan charges some of this guests.

      He clearly isn't selling to the highest bidder but the amount of overlap between "This person might be interesting to talk to" and "This person just so happens to also have something they want to sell" is insanely high.

  • Hint: (Score:5, Insightful)

    by fropenn ( 1116699 ) on Wednesday August 03, 2022 @10:52AM (#62759116)
    All guest choices on podcasts are designed to make money for the host. In some instances that might be from increasing listeners / viewers, in other instances it might be from a direct payment.

    Hosts with integrity should always report the latter, but you have to listen to all shows with a critical ear and know that there is always an agenda.
    • All guest choices on podcasts are designed to make money for the host. In some instances that might be from increasing listeners / viewers, in other instances it might be from a direct payment.

      Hosts with integrity should always report the latter, but you have to listen to all shows with a critical ear and know that there is always an agenda.

      Only in the sense that all conversations with your co-workers are designed to increase your salary.

      I'm sure lots of successful podcast hosts book guests primarily because they want to talk to them, or they think the person has something important to say that their audience would like to hear.

      There's a fiscal motivation at some level, but there's a big and fundamental difference between hosts booking to maintain the quality of their show and hosts booking because the guest paid them.

  • If you have a job title or your job description of influencer then you are an advertiser.
    As an advertiser it is rather common to charge for your services and if you can put people a person in front of hundreds of people who will listen to you and your product you better be paying the person that can do that.
  • Honestly, I don't care about the endless parade of morons with their always buthurt fee fees. The Butthurt Industrial Complex indeed.

    Let me know when we reopen our manufacturing sector in the US, so these people will be working in factories and have no time to figure out how to be maximum butthurt.

  • Constantly I am seeing a 'title' being thrown around that goes something like "So & So is a MSNBC Contributor". As a casual viewer I'm thinking someone is volunteering their time to be interviewed in order to offer their professional expertise, but as a (technical) professional in media I know better, but not all. Lately it seems clear such a title means they're on the payroll and I wonder what that's worth to them financially? Same goes for a title like NY Times reporter upon being interviewed on CNN,

Some people claim that the UNIX learning curve is steep, but at least you only have to climb it once.

Working...