Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses

Softbank's Sale of ARM To Nvidia Collapses, ARM To IPO (reuters.com) 23

According to Reuters, SoftBank's sale of ARM to U.S. chipmaker Nvidia has collapsed. Instead, SoftBank is planning to proceed with an initial public offering (IPO) with ARM CEO Simon Segars expected to resign, handing the job to president Rene Haas. From the report: The deal, announced in 2020, had faced several regulatory hurdles. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission sued to block it in December, arguing that competition in the nascent markets for chips in self-driving cars and a new category of networking chips could be hurt if Nvidia carried out the purchase. The buyout is also under the scrutiny of British and EU regulators amid concerns that it could push up prices and reduce choice and innovation.

The sale would have marked an early exit from Arm for Softbank, which acquired it for $32 billion. Chief Executive Masayoshi Son has lauded the potential of Arm, but is slashing his stakes in major assets to raise cash. The Financial Times was the first to report that Softbank's Arm-Nvidia deal had collapsed. The Japanese investment giant would receive a break-up fee of up to $1.25 billion, FT quoted one of the people as saying.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Softbank's Sale of ARM To Nvidia Collapses, ARM To IPO

Comments Filter:
  • by alvinrod ( 889928 ) on Tuesday February 08, 2022 @01:08AM (#62248379)
    Nvidia has managed to piss off just about every other company they've ever worked with in one way or another and I couldn't see them being good for ARM in the long run.
  • by DrXym ( 126579 )
    Nothing positive would have come from allowing a single manufacturer to own & control a company providing designs and services to its direct competition. It doesn't matter what guarantees or concessions they could have given, it was obviously a toxic deal for the entire chip industry.
  • When did "IPO" become a verb? Was it too much trouble to type the word "issue" before "IPO" in the title of the summary?

    • Welcome to the evolving nature of language and vocabulary. It's been going for probably 200000+ years now

      • Welcome to the evolving nature of language and vocabulary. It's been going for probably 200000+ years now

        I'm well aware of linguistic evolution, and I'm bound to say that I consider some of it to be devolution.

        Is this my cue to chase you off my lawn? :-)

    • When? Well over 20 years ago in the dotcom era. Probably even earlier.

      What's a youngin like you doing on this site?

      • When? Well over 20 years ago in the dotcom era. Probably even earlier.

        Guess I just missed it. I've heard and read about a lot of IPO's, but never known the verb form of the acronym.

        What's a youngin like you doing on this site?

        Flatterer! I joined Slashdot late in life - I'm well on the wrong side of 60.

    • by godrik ( 1287354 )

      News headline have always taken liberties with grammar to make the headline shorter and more impactful.

      Sure in the past they were doing it to save characters and boost font size. But the practice remained.

  • This is great news! ARM is much better off as its own separate entity.
  • Instead of having to purchase the entire company, Nvidia need only buy controlling interest in the stock at IPO.
    • If ARM is smart they will retain 51% of the shares! This way they retain control of the company no matter what.
      • You forget that it's Softbank that owns ARM, and Softbank started this whole thing because they are looking to divest themselves. I doubt that ARM will have any ability to retain control, it's not their call.
  • Funny how on the same day the (anticipated) announcement that nVidia won't subsume ARM, Intel has announced they are joining RISC-V, maybe Intel are anticipating a licencing price hike for ARM when they IPO.

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (1) Gee, I wish we hadn't backed down on 'noalias'.

Working...