Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
China

China Sets Trial Run For Digital Yuan in Top City Hubs (nikkei.com) 30

Chinese authorities will expand test use of the country's prototype digital currency across the nation's three leading urban clusters centered on Beijing, Shanghai and the southern cities of Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Hong Kong. From a report: The move, announced by the Ministry of Commerce, expands the coverage area for testing the cyber currency to a potential user base of around 400 million, or 29% of the country's population. It has been trialed since April in four cities with a combined population of 41 million, Work on the digital yuan, which is intended to be interchangeable with the country's paper currency, started more than five years ago but accelerated after Facebook unveiled its Libra digital currency project in June 2019.

Rising concerns that the U.S. could try to throttle China's access to the global dollar-based financial system, amid mounting tensions between Washington and Beijing, have fed further interest in the effort. "The digital yuan as a competitor of the greenback is more of a long-term phenomenon," said Andrew Collier, managing director of financial research company Orient Capital Research in Hong Kong. "Digitalization doesn't address the lack of free convertibility of the yuan," he said. "However the digitalization of the currency and other settlement systems gives an advantage to its (China's) institutions, which will be significant when the currency is liberalized."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

China Sets Trial Run For Digital Yuan in Top City Hubs

Comments Filter:
  • Impressive (Score:5, Interesting)

    by hdyoung ( 5182939 ) on Friday August 14, 2020 @11:45AM (#60401203)
    A state sponsored digital currency experiment that rolls out to 40+ million people. Wow. When China does a social experiment, it's pretty much immediately "the worlds largest example of......".

    China is really interesting. They are assembling some of the right pieces to be the next world power, except for their form of government. This needs to be repeated over, and over, and over: Absolutely nobody wants to deal with a dictatorship except for other dictators. If China's smart, they will keep developing and then sometime in 2030-2040 announce a shift to: a representative form of government, strong rule of law, and strong property rights. If they do that, and the US keeps on its current navel-gazing-head-in-ass trajectory, then we're looking at fundamental shift in world-leadership.

    On the other hand, if China stays a dictatorship/oligarchy for the long haul, they will plateau somewhere around the GDP-per-capita of Russia at the height of the soviet union and then start a slow decline. Very few countries will actually be friendly and they will have a hard time keeping high performers inside their borders.

    The ball is currently in China's court. Personally, I'm pessimistic that the leaders over there will willingly give up direct control. One can always hope. A representative government that large would be the biggest jump in human enlightenment since the US was founded.
    • People there already use AliPay and WeChat Pay extensively, so digital currency is not at all foreign to them.

      • Well, we use credit cards. I think that the centralized nature is what's new. Imagine if the US stood up it's own version of Venmo.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by photonrider ( 571060 )
      The likelihood of China shifting to a representative form of government is about as likely as a lion turning vegan. They'd lose power. Hmmmm.... though.... if there was a way for them to get as rich as say Gates, or Bezos, then maybe it could happen....
      • I would say it is likely they will adopt a hybrid approach to ensure stable changes. The US political system doesnt work because no vision is ever given the time it needs to come to fruition. The parties just screw each other to prevent the other from proving their ideas work. Want to fix that? Just dont vote at all and make it clear you wont be voting until the two parties can demonstrate a willingness to work together across issues. Compare the US and China to Taiwan, where they now have what they cal
    • by cusco ( 717999 )

      Absolutely nobody wants to deal with a dictatorship except for other dictators.

      I would disagree with this point, as corporations absolutely love dictators. If we continue to allow corporations to run roughshod over actual human citizens it won't be too long before the corporate-owned press corpse starts to enshrine the Chinese government as the model of the future.

    • China will be the next great world power. There is no *if* about it.

      The question is will there be another great world power, or will the world just become China-adjacent.
      -The Soviet Union fell, leaving Russia as but a shadow.
      -The USA is fading, although we still have an enormous military and a stranglehold on the world economy -for now.
      -If the European Union can stop bickering and come together as a unified power they can be the alternative to China.

      No other government has the strength and stability to cha

      • Respect for posting that on your real account. Most pro-China peeps run as AC's, which I'm not even going to respond to.

        I would agree that China *MIGHT* be the next world power, IF THEY CHANGE THEIR GOVERNMENT. To repeat my original post: nobody really wants to work with a dictatorship except for other dictators. With all due respect, Xi has dictatorial power. That makes China a dictatorship, regardless of what's on paper. As long as they keep this type of government, they will NEVER be a world leader.
    • Sorry, but Chinas rising power is because of their strong government and the culture that accepts it. I do not want that to be true, but there it is. While US is gridlocked on everything and unable to act, China enrolls 400 million in their next experiment, and it is done. This is behind their economic rise and it wont stop. It is not old school Marxism, its their own blend they have evolved over time, and its working. Meanwhile if we advocate coming up with anything similar in the US that holds onto cons

    • There are only two scenarios in which China changes governance model:
      - they bankrupt themselves soviet style. Seems unlikely in the next couple of decades at least
      - they lose a major war like the germans in WW 1&2 .
      No one gives up power willingly and it is highly unlikely the Chinese will rise and make the reform by themselves at this point.
      BTW, I think China should be broken up like - Tibet, Taiwan, Honk Kong, Xinjiang (Uighurs province), Makao and probably others should be independent. Inner Mo
    • Yeah, and China continues to move forwards in many respects. It is not finished . Democracy as seen in many countries is mostly an illusion and a cover for much the same authoritarian effect. The skill will be making one that isn't just a vinere designed to acquiesce the populace and actually does have a positive effect in line with the desires of the population. They allow experiments to happen every now and again, but little positive comes from them, as it typical with fledgling democratic efforts. They s

  • If the "digital currency" is being controlled and tracked by a central authority with a one to one tie to a fiat currency, please explain to me how this is fundamentally different than say....digital numerals describing a balance of a bank account or an "available balance" on a credit card. It isn't like those amounts listed are backed by physical commodities. The only exist in the digital realms and maybe a physical ledger somewhere listing the same numerals.
    • That's a good question. Clearly there must be a difference else they would not bother.
      Perhaps they plan for it to not be 1:1 linked at some point, but how is that different to just making another currency? Perhaps it isn't much different, just easier - there's no pretence on there being actual physical monetary assets being moved around behind the scenes, which surely does happen at some point in some way with non-digital currency.

      Perhaps existing currency has some baggage that is difficult to shed, and a n

  • I don't really see a key difference to electronic money transfers. It is neither independent nor decentralized and has absolutely no value for people outside China. Nor can it be successful in imposing total government control unless all other payment methods are eliminated.
  • by dwater ( 72834 )

    The sooner a stop is put to the US advantage and its manipulation the better.

A morsel of genuine history is a thing so rare as to be always valuable. -- Thomas Jefferson

Working...