Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses

Amazon Wants To Curb Selling 'CRaP' Items it Can't Profit On, Like Bottled Water and Snacks: Report (wsj.com) 222

Amazon is rethinking its strategy around some items it sells which it calls internally "Can't realize a profit" -- or "CRaP" for short, according to the Wall Street Journal. From the report: Inside Amazon, the items are known as CRaP, short for "Can't Realize a Profit." Think bottled beverages or snack foods [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled; alternative source]. The products tend to be priced at $15 or less, are sold directly by Amazon, and are heavy or bulky and therefore costly to ship -- characteristics that make for thin or nonexistent margins. Now, as Amazon focuses more on its bottom line in addition to its rapid growth, it is increasingly taking aim at CRaP products, according to major brand executives and people familiar with the company's thinking.

In recent months, it has been eliminating unprofitable items and pressing manufacturers to change their packaging to better sell online, according to brands that sell on Amazon and consultants who work with them. One example: bottled water from Coca-Cola Co. Amazon used to have a $6.99 six-pack of Smartwater as the default order on some of its Dash buttons, a small device that allows for automatic reordering with a single press. But in August, after working with Coca-Cola to change how it ships and sells the water, Amazon notified Dash customers it was changing that default item to a 24-pack for $37.20.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Amazon Wants To Curb Selling 'CRaP' Items it Can't Profit On, Like Bottled Water and Snacks: Report

Comments Filter:
  • Bottled water... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by b0s0z0ku ( 752509 ) on Monday December 17, 2018 @11:37AM (#57816662)
    I don't get it -- much of the US outside of places like Flint, MI already has a reliable water delivery system. Trucking it in via tiny bottles is pretty silly.
    • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

      Bottled water even in places where tap water is perfectly drinkable to the point where water being bottled is taken straight from the tap and ran through a simple filtering system that doesn't really do anything is extremely profitable because of marketing.

      So it's sold.

      That said, in places where tap water is of too low quality to drink, there's a genuine market for bottled water.

    • by Tomahawk ( 1343 )

      I too find bottled water very confusing. We have potable water being pumped into our homes, and here (in Ireland) there were riots when the Government introduced water charges (which the Government eventually backtracked on). Yet people here still buy bottled water!

      To put this in context, the water charges were something like 3.3c (that's €0.033) per 1000 litres of water.
      A 500ml bottle of water is typically about €1. So for the cost of buying a single 500ml bottle of water you would have paid f

      • I need you to send written expert testimony to my State legislature, as I'm proposing we eliminate the water and sewage charge. We've been force-selling people's houses as the charge increases, and I believe a 0.11% income tax would cover the reasonable use load. I need information about anywhere already doing this.

      • So, yeah, the mind boggles when I see people so every so casually spending money on bottled water.

        I know right! Last time I went hiking people looked at me like some kind of weirdo when I simply held my backpack under the tap so I could take some with me.

        Ok that post was only 50% sarcasm, my backpack had a water bladder inside it.

      • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

        I too find bottled water very confusing. We have potable water being pumped into our homes, and here (in Ireland) there were riots when the Government introduced water charges (which the Government eventually backtracked on). Yet people here still buy bottled water!

        To put this in context, the water charges were something like 3.3c (that's â0.033) per 1000 litres of water.
        A 500ml bottle of water is typically about â1. So for the cost of buying a single 500ml bottle of water you would have paid for

    • In a lot of places the tap water can taste funny even if perfectly safe - lots of people canâ(TM)t be bothered to filter their own. Bottled water is at least usually consistent in taste... so a lot of people buy it for various things (like travel or events).

    • It's not always about health. Sometimes it's literally a matter of taste.

      At least where we live now, we have a large quantity of naturally occurring sodium in our ground water. When combined with the chlorination of the water treatment system, the result is tap water with an excessively salty taste. As in, it ruins what would otherwise be perfectly good tea or coffee and can affect cooking recipes to a lesser degree. Put simply, it isn't at all pleasant to drink by itself unless it's been filtered several a

      • Re:Bottled water... (Score:5, Informative)

        by DogDude ( 805747 ) on Monday December 17, 2018 @12:36PM (#57817132)
        And of course, each of those water bottles that you use is going to be around on the planet for thousands of years. That's a tremendous amount of environmental damage you're creating for no good reason.
        • If it goes into a landfill, the environmental impact is basically zero. It's only a problem if it somehow gets into the ocean and starts floating around. It's not actually going to cause problems for a thousand years.
          • by DogDude ( 805747 )
            There's the wasted energy that goes into making that plastic bottle. And of course, the toxic chemicals that must be used to make it aren't good. And the oil that went into that plastic bottle won't be usable by humans likely ever again. There's no upside to it, for sure, but there are certainly downsides.
            • How much wasted energy? You don't know, you have no idea. Your problem is you don't like them, so you imagine reasons for them to be bad. That's why you come up with ridiculous ideas like bottles in landfills are hurting the environment.

              Instead of trying to support your ideas, attack them: that is the scientific way.
        • by GuB-42 ( 2483988 )

          Tap water that tastes like crap is a good reason for buying bottled water.
          And it won't make a "tremendous amount of environmental damage" if disposed of properly.

          The problem with bottled water is that because of aggressive marketing, some people are persuaded that bottled water is healthier when it is not. It is indeed a problem. But blaming someone for drinking bottled water after making a personal choice is going too far.
          What's next? Criticizing people for taking daily showers. Latest research seem to con

        • And of course, each of those water bottles that you use is going to be around on the planet for thousands of years. That's a tremendous amount of environmental damage you're creating for no good reason.

          If a desire to drink something that doesn't taste like salt water isn't a "good reason" to you, I'd suggest that you've valued dogmatism more than you've valued having a proper regard towards your fellow man.

          I'm not a "I don't get what the big deal is" person. I'm not a "I simply must have water from a spring-fed river" person. I'm a "I hate getting bottled water, but see no reasonable alternative" person, which should have been clear from my previous post. I'm already avoiding bottled water where I can (e.

    • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

      It's a class marker. People do it to distinguish themselves from the flyover morons. Drinking tapwater marks you as deplorable. You really make so little you can't afford Evian? Bet you drive a pickup truck, too.
    • The soda companies pretty much market all the bottled water, they simply switched to something cheaper to manufacture. They had existing distribution channels and an advertising department very familiar with selling useless products.

      They used their leverage as a soda company to create a market for bottled water.

      I remember in the 80s every grocery store used to have an entire aisle of soda, one side was two liters and the other 6 packs of cans. Now you go into a store and it's maybe 1/4 soda and 3/4 bott
    • by urusan ( 1755332 )

      Trucking it in via tiny bottles is very silly, but I drink mostly "bottled" water.

      Where I live the water is extremely gross to drink, even though I'm fairly sure it's safe to drink. We use our tap water freely in any situations where taste doesn't matter, like cooking (the taste of the water is overwhelmed by the taste of the food), showers, washing things, etc. It's so bad tasting that I am willing to pay extra to get less terrible tasting water.

      However, individually packaged bottled water is still extreme

    • Where I live we have PFOA leaking into our water system, even well water is affected. While the state has put in water purifiers the population still really doesn't trust it.

      That and a lot of the water from wells, has a lot of minerals smells like rotten eggs (sulfer) and tastes like crap.

    • if you've ever tried to bottle your own water you'll know that:
      1. it doesn't keep fresh that long
      2. TSA won't let you take filled bottles past the security checkpoint

      Packing a bottle of water in a gym bag or sack lunch is about convenience. It has nothing to do with the perceived safety of tap water.

    • I wish I lived in one of those places.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 17, 2018 @11:38AM (#57816674)

    During cyber week, I found 12 packs of Fanta Grape on sale for $3.99 on prime pantry. I ordered 100 of them just to see what would happen.

    Amazon is so inefficient that they actually sent 100 individually-boxed 12-packs. Plus I got free shipping.

    Talk about "can't realize a profit." Their own stupidity probably cost them well over $1000 in shipping on a $400 order of soda.

    • by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 17, 2018 @11:43AM (#57816706)

      Sounds like you, alone, maybe the sole reason for this change! LOL.

    • by LostMyAccount ( 5587552 ) on Monday December 17, 2018 @12:02PM (#57816832)

      That reminds me of a (probably urban legend) story about a guy who was building a masonry building in a remote location. It was fantastically expensive to ship the masonry in. The location did have postal delivery, and the guy figured out he could flat-rate ship individual blocks for a total amount that was much less than regular shipping, so he wound up mailing them.

    • Reminds me of an article on theregister [theregister.co.uk] back in 2008 about an incredibly inefficient packing job -- HP shipping two large cardboard boxes taped together, containing sixteen smaller boxes, each of which contained -- in foam packing -- two sheets of A4 paper.
    • by Brett Buck ( 811747 ) on Monday December 17, 2018 @12:12PM (#57816938)

      Spent $400 to get 1200 cans of grape soda? And Amazon is the sucker in the story?

    • I bought some kind of washer (small part for something) it came in one of those big amazon boxes with bubble wrap etc. So incredibly wasteful.
      • I bought some kind of washer (small part for something) it came in one of those big amazon boxes with bubble wrap etc. So incredibly wasteful.

        Eh, maybe, maybe not.

        The cardboard is obviously renewable. They usually use inflatable plastic stuff that once the air is out is very low volume.

        The question is whether it's any worse than driving all over town looking for the washer would be.

      • by lgw ( 121541 )

        So incredibly wasteful.

        It was packed in the smallest box the packing guy had at his station. The "air fill" (what they use instead of bubble wrap) is spit out by computer at the station, calculated to fill the box.

        It was a huge step forward at distribution centers when Amazon discovered padded envelopes. It cost millions to change their systems to start using them, of course, but they got 20% less silly in their packing.

        But it was never wasteful: Amazon is optimizing for the labor cost of sending that item. As that's the domin

  • by XxtraLarGe ( 551297 ) on Monday December 17, 2018 @11:38AM (#57816676) Journal
    Lando Calrissian: That wasn't part of the deal! You said the $6.99 six-pack of Smartwater was the default order on my Dash button!
    Darth Bezos: I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.
  • by UnknowingFool ( 672806 ) on Monday December 17, 2018 @11:38AM (#57816678)
    Wasn't Amazon trying to get into the grocery delivery business? I can imagine there are lots of items in grocery that would be unprofitable especially when delivery is factored into the cost.
  • The Truth? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by bigpat ( 158134 ) on Monday December 17, 2018 @11:44AM (#57816714)

    Dear Amazon, How about, for Prime Customers especially since you now have Whole Foods and other local brick and mortar stores, just tell customers when they are better off driving over to Whole Foods. If you know who we are, where we are shopping from then how about give us a break and straight up tell us when we can find a better price local without the overhead of curbside shipping.

    Some things will likely always be cheaper to ship bulk and then pick up local.

    Thanks,
    Pat

    • by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Monday December 17, 2018 @12:15PM (#57816968)

      If I’m driving to a brick and mortar grocery store, I’m going to the Winco that’s 4 minutes away - and a lot cheaper than Whole Paycheck.

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      Prime isn't worth it, and this just makes it an even worse deal. Items eligible for Prime delivery cost more anyway, i.e. they already have the cost of expedited shipping added in. Amazon isn't all that cheap anyway for most things, it's only the free super-saver delivery that saves it.

      Being able to get basic stuff delivered added a lot of value to Prime, in terms of convenience. They are really trying to make it unattractive.

      • Remember to use your qualifiers kids.... Prime isn't worth it if all you use it for is free shipping....

        Prime is worth it if you borrow Kindle books for free (vs buying), use Amazon's streaming service, etc. Like any other subscription plan, the more features that you use, the more of valuable it is.

        • Comment removed based on user account deletion
          • As someone who lives in the UK afaict UK prime is better than us prime. AIUI US prime only gives free 2-day delivery while UK prime gives free next day or if you prefer nominated day on most Amazon-stocked items (some items seem to have more restrictive options, probablly as a result of being in different warehouses). Also unlike most next-day and nominated day services Amazon offers weekend deliveries at no extra cost.

            Prime is great when you are doing something like preparing for an event when you want to

            • As someone who lives in the UK afaict UK prime is better than us prime. AIUI US prime only gives free 2-day delivery while UK prime gives free next day or if you prefer nominated day on most Amazon-stocked items (some items seem to have more restrictive options, probablly as a result of being in different warehouses). Also unlike most next-day and nominated day services Amazon offers weekend deliveries at no extra cost.

              Prime is great when you are doing something like preparing for an event when you want to order a bunch of stuff over a short period (but not all at once because you inevitablly find you need more stuff as the preperations proceed). I haven't yet found motivation to stay subscribed all the time though, I just buy a month when I want it.

              I know amazon UK has a video service, but I dunno if it's better or worse than the US one, I haven't tried it personally.

              I live in the US and can get free same day delivery on many items. If its a common item that is ordered a lot in my metro area they will deliver it the same day for free, up until noon. If I order after noon then I will get it the next day. Rarer and more expensive things typically come next day - though again this depends on popularity.

            • Comment removed based on user account deletion
          • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

            I used to live in the UK where you could get the TV and I think some music. There is some good stuff on the TV, like The Man in the High Castle, but after about a month you have exhausted the original content and it's not worth renewing.

            In Ireland you can't seem to get the TV. At least my smart TV tells me it's not available in my region. There is no Amazon Ireland per-se, they have a distribution centre in Dublin but you use the .co.uk domain and pay in Sterling.

        • Depends where you live. Outside of s metropolis Amazon lets you get stuff that's not available locally and at a certain point in life you have all the hard goods you need that local places sell. Amazon lets you get things that city people can get at niche specialty stores without living a city life. We probably average three Amazon deliveries a week and the gas savings alone are worthwhile, even if the labor cost of trying to find obscure items is set at zero.

  • but Amazon's the #1 place for odd ball snacks and assorted dry goods. Plus there's bulk. I buy curry mix from them because it's 1/3 the price I pay in town, but I buy it bulk. I can't imagine they don't make profit on that. Maybe they mean a generic thing of pretzels. Are folks actually buying that?
  • Amazon should use their other playbook and just start selling their own Smartwater (TM) forcing the Coke Dealers out of business. And even when they sell it at a tenth of the price, they'll still finally make money on something else besides AWS.
  • Just what Amazon needs, more profits. How long before Amazon gets too big and bloated seeking more and more profits that an upstart comes in doing what Amazon used to do and steals all the business thus restarting the cycle?
    • by AvitarX ( 172628 )

      I'm not convinced a start up is going to want to start selling things that cost too much to ship online.

    • More fundamentally why are we so wasteful with fuel and packaging on items that people can just buy locally? It was a dumb idea when Amazon started doing it and it is dumb now.
    • If Amazon, with its incredible logistics and economy of scale, cannot profitably sell these goods online for a reasonable price... why do you think anyone else can? They will face the exact same challenges, probably without some of the advantages that Amazon has.

      They're competing with bulk delivery at supermarkets, which has a tremendous cost advantage.

      Supermarkets will offer lower prices for the foreseeable future. If people aren't willing to pay a hefty premium for the delivery of (some) household goods,

  • by DontBeAMoran ( 4843879 ) on Monday December 17, 2018 @12:11PM (#57816920)

    Rule of acquisition #2: "Never spend more for an acquisition than you have to."

    Amazon used to have a six-pack of Smartwater for 6.99$.
    Now it's going to be a 24-pack of Smartwater for 37.20$.

    So either the size of the bottles has changed or each bottle of Smartwater will now cost 1.55$ instead of 1.17$, which is a 32.5% price increase.

  • It's insane to use Amazon logistics to deliver beverages. That shit is all shipping costs, and Amazon will never compete with large scale grocery deliveries.

    • by DogDude ( 805747 )
      They're just going to keep it up long enough until they extinguish all of their competition. Then, they can jack up their prices. Unfettered capitalism at its finest.
  • I realize its not exactly the CRaP issue but it might be what shoves some products into that category. I use Prime alot because even Walmart means a 25 mile round trip here. So having stuff delivered is usually great value proposition for me in terms of my personal time and my own costs in driving to go get stuff.

    Some of Amazon's packaging choices however are atrocities. I have lost count of the number of times I have got a shoeboxed sized or larger carton packed with bubble wrap when a padded envelope w

    • They probably want to sell you the kindling as well.

    • by Pascoea ( 968200 ) on Monday December 17, 2018 @01:07PM (#57817438)

      That and Amazon always uses bubble wrap, never paper? Why not paper Amazon

      I have a small bit (about 2 years) of experience on this one. I used to pack boxes for a company that shipped all sorts of hardware. (Hardware store kind of stuff, not like computer hardware.) Paper is a HUGE pain in the ass. It certainly is an effective packing material, but I can't stress enough how much overhead is involved.

      We had two types: 30" wide rolls and 2'x3' sheets. (like this [uline.com] and this [uline.com]) The first problem, shit's heavy. 30-50 lbs per roll/bundle. It takes a lot of work to just move it around, it takes up a lot of space to stack it and store it. Likely Amazon's biggest problem with it, the labor costs to shove it into a box. A small-ish (6x8x4) box that's half-full of whatever takes about 3-5 feet off a roll, or 2-3 sheets off a stack. And it goes up fast for bigger boxes. I realize that doesn't sound like a lot, but if your job is to stuff 100 boxes/hour (probably more, for Amazon) that's a whole lot of paper you have to pay someone to shove into a box.

      From a labor perspective, the air pillow are amazing. The rolls of feed-stock are lighter. The pillows themselves are essentially weightless. It takes a lot less effort to pull them out of the hopper than to unspool/crumple up kraft. And they take less time to shove them into a box. Their downfall, and why we quit using them, they didn't hold up well enough for the type of stuff we were shipping... They don't do well with heavy/pointy things. But I can see why Amazon would use them, a lot of the stuff they ship is already in a box.

  • What kind of idiot would spend $1.55 for a bottle of water - especially when purchased by the case? The original price of $1.17 per bottle in the 6-pack was already overpriced.

  • I thought bottled water was bad enough, but mail ordered bottled water?
  • What's the shipping cost of the words tiniest violin?
  • by Crashmarik ( 635988 ) on Monday December 17, 2018 @01:41PM (#57817722)

    Destroy the people that were selling it at a profit and then when they are gone raise prices.

  • In Amazonian lore, the long tail is the killer Godzilla of lost leaders.

    You come for the long tail, you leave with a flying carton filled with All the Usual Retail Suspects (AuRS).

    And now here comes Bezos all in a huff, treading on his own tail after a sharp 180, having finally nosed his way to the realization that dragging a long, flashy appendage along in the dirt behind the poop orifice was never a genius design in the first place.

    • by epine ( 68316 )

      "Sayonara", of course, but I guess my spelling checker (i.e. typo extractor) doesn't reliably activate in the subject line.

      I hesitate to call it a spelling checker straight up, because my typo extractor sure doesn't spell any better than I do, if you count half the valid words it still doesn't know. I've been patiently training it for ten years, and just now I had to add "irreproducibility" despite it knowing both "reproducibility" and "irreproducible". Dumb as a bag of hammers, truth be told.

      File under thi

  • After cherry-picking all the profitable items, if you leave only the CRaP to the grocery stores, it will be expensive there too.
  • To get free shipping for items in Prime Pantry [amazon.com], you have to order more than $35 worth of stuff. Or pay $5.99 in shipping if you order less than $35 (even with Prime membership).

    The story here seems to be that Amazon's employees who are supposed to categorize which items go into Prime Pantry are doing such a poor job, that they're letting some items slip into their regular delivery system.
  • by WaffleMonster ( 969671 ) on Monday December 17, 2018 @03:25PM (#57818564)

    Most stores don't have the luxury of selling only items that make them the most money. They have enough sense to understand if they did that the buyer will just go somewhere else where they can get everything they want and end up buying NOTHING at the store giving the customer a hard time.

    But this is Amazon we're talking about. The same company that intentionally slows down shipping to uncompetitive levels (2-day is Free @ Walmart, most eBay purchases arrive before Amazon even ships) imposes minimum purchase requirements, prevents non-members from purchasing certain items commonly available elsewhere (e.g. Star Wars DVDs). Perhaps the rules don't apply to Amazon today but eventually they will.

  • The tap water in my area isn't bad, just water: I assume if I don't notice flavor it's OK.
    Certainly not unhealthy.
    Yet I constantly see families from the poor part of town hauling off large water bottles from those machines in front of laundramats selling "non ionized/alkaline water".
    They would appear to be the last people who could afford to buy water, but there they are standing in line doing it.
    Unless their house/apartment water is godawful, I don't get it. The places they're living aren't more than 20 ye

  • Printed. The money stays an "author", "printer" and "publisher".
    Are heavy or bulky?
    But profitable to grow brand on?
  • Cat litter (Score:4, Funny)

    by Tony Isaac ( 1301187 ) on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:16AM (#57822008) Homepage

    My cat was very picky, wouldn't use the cat box unless the litter was unscented. Our local stores didn't carry any decent unscented litter, so we bought it on Amazon, for $7 for a 40 pound bucket, delivered free in two days.

    Amazon eventually figured out that this wasn't working for them, so they changed it to an "add-on item," requiring you to buy $35-worth of stuff for it to qualify for Prime. So I bought 5 buckets. The delivery guy wasn't too happy, but I got my cat litter!

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...