GitHub Founder Resigns Following Harassment Investigation 182
An anonymous reader writes "Late Yesterday, GitHub concluded its investigation regarding sexual harassment within its work force, and although it found no evidence of 'legal wrongdoing,' Tom Preston-Werner, one of its founding members implicated in the investigation resigned. In its statement, GitHub vows to implement 'a number of new HR and employee-led initiatives as well as training opportunities to make sure employee concerns and conflicts are taken seriously and dealt with appropriately.' Julie Ann Horvath, the former GitHub employee whose public resignation last month inspired the sexual harassment investigation, found the company's findings to be gratuitous and just plain wrong."
Re:The term "Sexual Harassment" is very misleading (Score:4, Informative)
The "other guy" being an ex boyfriend
Re:Good. (Score:5, Informative)
I mostly agree with you, on this occasion. Except one detail: this founder nor his wife were part of the harassment accusations. I suppose it's just a bit unfortunate, if understandable, that the victim combined all her grievances in a single blog post. But the sexual harassment bit was about someone else. So an example has not been made actually, because that guy was apparently promoted!
Re:The term "Sexual Harassment" is very misleading (Score:5, Informative)
No idea as to the credibility of this blog, but worth a read anyway:
https://medium.com/p/d96f431f4... [medium.com]
Re:The term "Sexual Harassment" is very misleading (Score:4, Informative)
The original accusation has a human being who's come forward and publicly attached her name and career prospects to it, and is accepting significant personal costs to do so. The anonymous blog post is 100% consequence free for the author. That does imply a relative difference in credibility.