IBM Won't Open-Source OS/2 394
wikinerd writes "Following an online petition in November 2007 by members of an OS/2 online community to open-source OS/2, IBM answered by sending a letter via FedEx making it clear that OS/2 is going to remain closed-source, citing business, technical, and legal reasons. An earlier petition in 2005 that had attracted over 11,000 signatures met a similar response. Both petition letters to IBM Corp. can be viewed at the OS2World.com library. The End of Support period for OS/2 passed by in December 2006, and the given IBM's response the future for OS/2 doesn't look bright, unless re-implementation projects such as Voyager or osFree attract the necessary critical mass of operating system developers."
Windows NT (Score:2, Interesting)
Am I wrong in this thought?
MS Code issues I'd gather (Score:5, Interesting)
In retrospect I do believe that MS pulled the plug simply because of the "lock-in-factor" on their OS. (they don't share well with others) OS/2 was a very nice OS back in the day. And yes, it ran well.. was better than DOS and made Windows look like crap back in the day. (if ya never ran it, then mod yourself -1)
Re:IBM vs. Sun? (Score:5, Interesting)
About the only thing in this day and age that I'd like to see would be the Workplace Shell ported to X. It still makes Windows look like its inbred retarded cousin. As for everything else, the operating system is old, and I don't think there's much in it that hasn't already been done elsewhere anyways.
Piracy was the death of OS/2 (Score:5, Interesting)
But not in the way the BSA would have you believe, the simple fact was that like you, people like me couldn't get their hands on OS/2 through copyright infringement. For the record I stayed with DOS for far longer and later W95 (wasn't till the early parts of W2K that I learned about unix and later linux) but the simple fact is that MS has had a simple advantage, its software is available to those who for what ever reason don't buy their software in boxes.
I did have my hands on a trial of OS/2 Warp, but I never managed to install it on my PC. Another advantage to W95 which was buggy as hell and often had problem during install BUT did eventually run.
A similar problem is happening right now with Vista, hard to pirate, so I haven't tried it.
So what you ask? Well like many here I am the IT support guy in my social circle and I can't support Vista because I don't know it. How are you going to answer a call asking how to change a setting when you have no idea what is where? I am not going to claim that people I know stay with XP because they can't get support from me otherwise but it is a simple choice, learn windows Vista when you never learned/wanted to learn Windows in the first place, or stay with XP I will be happy to hand you a copy off.
QUESTION: I don't know why OS/2 failed.
ANSWER: Fact is that many people liked it but didn't manage to get a copy.
Piracy has been a critical element in MS rise to fame. With Vista they are taking a gamble, has their lockin become powerfull enough they can now survive without it? Personally I think it has, but you never know. MS might soon face a real nightmare, being beaten NOT by a competitor they can out advertise or EVEN outperform, but beaten by their own product.
Or not, Vista ain't a ME yet and ME never threathened their business model.
Wistful Sigh.... (Score:3, Interesting)
I briefly went to Windows95, after my install disks died (bloody weird format, too). That didn't last long, and in a fury of frustration, I decided to look at Linux again.
I never looked back. Oh yes, I miss some things. I miss Workplace Shell most of all, but then KDE does most of what WPS did. Indeed, having Linux gives me a lot more useful stuff that I never even had with Warp or any other OS. I don't miss it so much anymore.
IBM had something great but didn't defend it very well in the marketplace. I'm probably better off having gone the Linux route.
--
BMO
Re:IBM vs. Sun? (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyways the Workplace Shell (WPS) is still ahead of any other operating shell I have used. And it is supposedly IBMs IP. Some years ago there was a rumour that IBM was going to open source the WPS. Shame it didn't happen.
With things like Cairo getting integrated into the WPS it is still quite nice and Cairo allows the eye candy that people nowadays seem to demand.
Current screen shots of the WPS are available here, http://svn.netlabs.org/wps-wizard [netlabs.org] and here http://svn.netlabs.org/wps-wizard/wiki/WpsWizardScreenshots [netlabs.org].
Of course this just shows how it looks, not how it functions.
Re:IBM vs. Sun? (Score:2, Interesting)
IBM cannot make OS/2 open source, as they do not own all of it.
No, this sort of FUD keeps resurfacing. If they didn't own it they couldn't have sold it to Serenity Systems.
This is no different whether closed or open source and FUD'ers who claim that something "can't be open sourced" are usually just bullshitting. It's almost the exactly the same as saying "can't be sold".
Open sourcing is the equivalent of a normal sale but for zero dollars. I hope you're not going to to try and claim that IBM can't sell OS/2, source and binary, for whatever price it likes?
---
Open source software is everything that closed source software is. Plus the source is available.
OS/2 is awesome (Score:5, Interesting)
In 1994, I worked for IBM and involved in testing of OS/2 (pre-warp time if my memory serves) in Hong Kong. I mainly helped testing business applications, especially Chinese apps. There's another team who were testing games(dream job right)?
The game team always invited me for 'professional opinions' because I were like a profession gamer to them. I managed to run 4 sessions of Ultima 8 in a 386. The gameplay play was smooth, even the opening video was being played without hiccup. Awesome. Imagine it's during the period when its top competitor Windows 95 would crash from time to time running one sessions of Ultima 8. I don't want to bore you with the details how great it run other applications, but I can tell you it can run more than one session of Windows 95 full-screen and windowed. (I heard Microsoft had some legal questions with that later on.. but still, OS/2 could really do that).
Don't laugh at OS/2, it sold, millions copies; some came along with PS/2, some were embedded in ATMs and cashiers. They stopped update and development since 2006, but still, OS/2 installed machines generates revenue for IBM, even today.
Where OS/2 failed was some top boneheads in IBM asked their major software competitor, Microsoft, to develop the initial OS/2 1.x. Microsoft still owns many of the royalties inside OS/2. The more OS/2 sold, the more Microsoft got. I've been told later IBM had difficult time in negotiations with Microsoft on lowering the royalties fee in new contracts, because, obviously, crushing OS/2 benefits Microsoft more than letting it survive.
Re:OS/2 is awesome (Score:3, Interesting)
The bank i used to work for still has ATMs running on OS/2 procured specially from NCR.
Open-sourcing OS/2 is out of question legally for IBM, as OS/2 contracts with NCR and other companies specifically prohibit this.
Firstly IBM would be sued by licensees of OS/2 for breach of security.
Secondly, if any script kiddie gets hold of the source, deciphers OS/2 to a root level and manages to upload a patch to an ATM... the result would be ugly for IBM (oh, the kid would long be having fun in Gitmo, but that's a different story).
Seriously, if i were IBM, i would smile and wave and refuse to let OS/2 be open-sourced for another 99 years.
what exactly does OS/2's source have to offer? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Piracy was the death of OS/2 (Score:5, Interesting)
Being young and barely having a notion of what I really wanted, I wanted a copy of OS/2 Warp just to mess with it. I might have been... 11? I couldn't find a copy, even after a trip to St. Louis (not only would I ride in the back seat, but I had to sit in the middle!) What 11 year old wanted to try a new and different operating system? I mean what the hell. Well, nonetheless, it just wasn't available where ever I was able to look, or where ever Mom helped me look.
But I had my Slackware version 1 CDs! So I messed with Linux, barely knowing what I was doing, barely getting anywhere really, but learning. That's an impressionable time! And I didn't spend it learning OS/2 for lack of availability. I specifically remember the random guy at the software store in St. Louis not knowing what-the-fuck when I asked about OS/2. Damn it. It's the city, they're suppose to have that shit.
Oh well! I guess if OS/2 had been worth learning then I could have found a copy and I would have messed with it. But I couldn't, legal or not. Your post reminded me of that.
Banking (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Piracy was the death of OS/2 (Score:3, Interesting)
In early '93 IBM Germany started a big campaign to get OS/2 to the public. You could get OS/2 2.0 for a more or less symbolic sum (I don't remember how much it was, but quite inexpensive), with a cheap upgrade to OS/2 2.1 coming out shortly after it. And it really rocked. Then Warp (3.0) came, even better. But then the Internet came. For Windows (3.x) at the time you had to use Trumpet Winsock, which sucked but at least was there. Warp had a dial-up client, but no real LAN TCP/IP functionality. The TCP/IP stack had to be purchased separately. Expensively. But even if you wanted to, there was no way to get it: IBM sold its OS/2 add-ons only through their local partners, which just were not interested to send some guy who didn't want to purchase an entire network from them a quote over a one software package for a measly 300 EUR. I never even got any kind of answer from them. So no TCP/IP in the LAN. So sooner or later goodbye OS/2 and hello Win95 and Linux (they changed this with OS/2 4.0, but then NT 4 was already coming out, so too little too late).
This is just one example of the boneheaded decisions IBM made regarding marketing and sales of OS/2. But there were many of them. It speaks for OS/2 that in spite of all this it was so hard to kill.
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:IBM vs. Sun? (Score:3, Interesting)
thinking about OpenDoc, it makes me wonder if something like that can't be incorporated into AJAX. you know, all the components/js code to view the page might come from the the page server but if there's an editor or similar component locally stored/cached then it is used for viewing/editing/etc. There'd have to be part registration body or service and all that jazz but it would be cool if it could happen IMO. Personally, I like the idea of specialized components since it's very similar to the *nix design philosophy of a lot of small, efficient, special purpose tools used together for a wide variety of larger applications.
For some reason, I thought IBM did open source some of the OS/2 tech but maybe not. I heard about JFS being ported from OS/2's version in all that SCO-IBM AIX stuff. There was an IBM speech recognition system they either open source or provided free but that could have come from OS/2 or AIX. Obviously SOM and DSOM which should be all IBM tech since it came after the Microsoft/IBM split. OpenDOC was based on SOM with some Apple tech in there for things like Bento and other OpenDoc-isms.
There was alot of cool tech which ran on OS/2 and it would still be useful today on Linux IMO. There is nothing today anywhere which comes even close to what the WorkplaceShell provided.
LoB