MIT Sues Frank Gehry Over Buggy $300M CS Building 388
theodp writes "MIT has filed a negligence suit against world-renowned architect Frank Gehry, charging that flaws in his design of the $300 million Stata Center, one of the most celebrated works of architecture unveiled in years, caused leaks to spring, masonry to crack, mold to grow, and drainage to back up. The complex, which houses a Who's Who of Computing including Tim Berners-Lee and Richard Stallman, includes the William H. Gates Building."
Re:architects vs civil engineers (Score:5, Informative)
next time they should hire a civil engineer ...
I think the trick is to get both.
Re:architects vs civil engineers (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.fishercenter.bard.edu/about/ [bard.edu] - another Gehry monstrosity. A performing Arts Center with no shops nor dressing rooms directly accessible to backstage.
Re:flakey architects (Score:4, Informative)
No sympathy for Ghery in Minneapolis (Score:5, Informative)
Gehry won't be receiving much sympathy from the residents of Minneapolis, who are forced to live with the Weisman Museum. The 'tin man' as it's known is sore-thumb public eyesore #1 in the U of M campus area.
Eyesore - figuratively and literally. Not only is this one of the ugliest, most mis-placed pieces of architecture in the metro, its reflective stainless steel skin blinds drivers crossing the Washington Avenue bridge in the late afternoon, when the sun is behind them and they're headed eastbound. Nice planning, folks.
Oh, and about the skin.. it's badly wrinkled, due to "unforeseen" issues with thermal expansion and contraction. Basically, the building looks like a crushed aluminum take-out box, about to litter itself into the Mississippi river.
Same problem at Gehry's Peter B Louis Building (Score:3, Informative)
This exact same problem is encountered every year at Gehry's Peter B Louis Building on the CWRU campus. We call the building the metal kleenex box, because it looks like a wavy brick building with a lot of useless big metal waves coming out in every direction from the top. The problem is that in the winter, these metal waves get covered in snow, which inevitably slides off onto the people below (Gehry strategically placed the largest such avalanche directly above one of the two main sidewalks on that corner).
Gehry (Score:4, Informative)
Re:flakey architects (Score:3, Informative)
Architecture vs. Engineering (Score:5, Informative)
No sympathy for Gehry in Seattle either (Score:3, Informative)
The pictures here don't show the true horror. The television news reporters across the street refer to this building as "the technicolor hemorrhoid."
Re:Architecture vs. Engineering (Score:5, Informative)
Challenging buildings like this work out all the time (see Arup) and there's nothing that says you have to have a boring building in order for the roof not to leak. It just costs more. Obviously someone was cutting corners in there somewhere.
Re:Architecture vs. Engineering (Score:3, Informative)
The point is, a design/architectural role is completely different than an engineering role. The architect isn't hired for his engineering abilities, but for his artistic talent, whereas the engineer is hired not for artistic talent but the ability to make it actually work. Obviously you'd expect an architect to have a rudimentary understanding of civil engineering so that he can filter out impractical ideas, but you can't rely on the architect to do the real engineering work.
Re:flakey architects (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Architecture vs. Engineering (Score:3, Informative)
Take that from my mouth: my wife is an architect, her brother is a civil/structural engineer.
I just talked to my wife about it, and she confirmed, that the civil engineer can overrule the architect only if the building in question is actually a bridge. In case of buildings like this one, the architect can basically tell the civil engineer to shove it and carry on with implementation of his idea. Except if there are some SERIOUS structural problems with the building, making it not safe, in which case the civil engineer does have the means to stop the raging architect from killing innocent bystanders.
HOWEVER, the part where you said "many competent civil and structural engineers all signed off on the plans for that building" is also correct! No building is built without a permission from the city engineering office (or whatever you call it), and those guys can NOT be overruled by an architect. They can be bribed, but not overruled
DISCLAIMER: what I wrote above holds for the large parts of (western) Europe. In the USA, the things might be different.