Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft The Internet

Microsoft to Pay $240 Million for Stake in Facebook 277

Nrbelex writes to mention The New York Times is reporting that Microsoft has beat out Google and Yahoo for a 1.6% stake in Facebook. The investment will cost Microsoft $240 million valuing the total site at somewhere around $15 billion. "The astronomical valuation for Facebook is primarily evidence that Microsoft executives believed they could not afford to lose out on the Facebook deal. Google appears to be building a dominant position in the race to serve advertisements online. Fearing it might lose control over the next generation of computer users, Microsoft has been attempting to match and in some cases block Google's plans, even if that effort is costly."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Microsoft to Pay $240 Million for Stake in Facebook

Comments Filter:
  • by Facetious ( 710885 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @05:48PM (#21105735) Journal
    ... a stake in the face, I suppose.
  • by wamatt ( 782485 ) * on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @05:49PM (#21105745)
    Can I be the first?
  • by Savage-Rabbit ( 308260 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @05:57PM (#21105859)

    ....because they're in the middle of a pissing match with Google.
    Are they competing for distance or accuracy?
  • by ackthpt ( 218170 ) * on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @06:01PM (#21105909) Homepage Journal

    Fearing it might lose control over the next generation of computer users, Microsoft has been attempting to match and in some cases block Google's plans, even if that effort is costly.
    In other words, they didn't spend $240 million for 1.6% because Facebook is worth $15 billion. They paid $240 million because they're in the middle of a pissing match with Google.

    Actually I blame it on bad Bistromathics, someone took one too many toothpicks from the bowl by the register and there's an extra mustard stain on the tablecloth.

  • by Dachannien ( 617929 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @06:01PM (#21105915)
    ...the wooden vampire-impaling kind of stake? Because if so, I think Microsoft's got it all backwards.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @06:05PM (#21105961)
    The past couple of days, I've been listening to my co-worker talk about hitting the wrong button and 'hugging' a large group of people. Not only is he freaking out that only the men have returned his 'hug', he is trying to figure out how tell these people that he did not mean it without alienating them.

    Who needs soap operas?
  • by 2ms ( 232331 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @06:09PM (#21106009)
    Based on the giant upgrade to IE7 suggestion that started popping up every time you log in, I'd thought this had already happened.
  • by SamP2 ( 1097897 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @06:11PM (#21106031)

    Are they competing for distance or accuracy?
    Volume.
  • by jc42 ( 318812 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @06:11PM (#21106037) Homepage Journal

    ....because they're in the middle of a pissing match with Google.

    Are they competing for distance or accuracy?

    Hey, this is Microsoft we're talking about. When have they ever worried about accuracy in anything they did?

  • by IgnoramusMaximus ( 692000 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @06:18PM (#21106113)

    I have a plan.

    Seeing this level of wisdom, after painstaking, conservative estimates of revenues and dividends were calculated to come up with this value of $15 billion, which would in the "quaint, old-fashioned" world of people who actually built companies to feed their families and those of their workers be requiring something like a billion of yearly revenue and something like $10 billion in assets, I came to the conclusion that we Slashdotters too can take advantage of this insanity.

    Here is what we should do: Each of us starts a corporation, with names like "IgnoramusMaximus' Megacorp Consolidated on the Internet!" (that last bit is important for the "traditional" investors) and then we "sell" to each other our "stakes" in these wonders of modern enterpreneurship for, say, conservatively, 20 million US dollars (or Euros) a share, with the price being "paid" in our equally valuable shares of the other Slashdotter's corporations. If we all say our stuff is worth beeeeeelions, who is to say otherwise! After all, we got web sites and email for these corps!!!

    Next thing you know, our shares can be traded on NASDAQ, NYNEX and who knows where else, as they are far in excess the required share price for those markets and I am sure we Slashdotters can create sufficient trade "volume" trading our super-shares via email 20 times a day.

    All that remains is for the turkeys, known as the "institutional investors" so start biting! After all they gamble on equally reasonably "valued" and brain-dead "opportunities" such as the above mentioned FaceBook. Why should they care if we have no product, no sales, no assets? That never stopped them before, did it?! And we are on the Internet!

    And so dear Slashdotters, I am hereby giving you your way to beeeeeelions of dollars (or euros) as easy as filling some paperwork and registering the name!

    So here it goes:

    • 1. Set up a useless Internet corporation
    • 2. Do a home-made "IPO" (complete with all the "buyer-beware" prospectuses as required by the FTC) and trade its shares for shares of other useless corporations, claiming per-share value in tens of millions (by mutual agreement).
    • 3. Create sufficient volume of trades with many, many Slashdot users thus fullfilling "serious" exchange listing requirements.
    • 4a. Get listed on NASDAQ
    • 4b. Claim your net worth is into billions if you need an actual money loan from a bank for anyting (and you will be right, according to the silly Wall Street definitions)
    • 4c. Wait for gamblers, otherwise known as "investors" to show up and start trading your make-believe corp (and they would not be able to tell a difference from a "real" one anyways). No danger of you getting accused of "inside trading" or "pump and dump" because you, on your corporation's website boldly state that "This company does Dick All, Bupkis and sometimes Didley Squat!" (in small print at the bottom)
    • 5. Profit!!
  • by MightyMartian ( 840721 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @06:29PM (#21106221) Journal

    I'm curious if any other companies have experienced this kind of growth. Does anyone have any examples?


    Enron... WorldCom... Kozmo.com...
  • by bigstrat2003 ( 1058574 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @06:30PM (#21106235)
    Yeah, there is, but that domain is just a redirect to slashdot.org.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @07:16PM (#21106705)
    Facebook is a text-based RPG.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @07:35PM (#21106951)
    I think it has more to do with the fact that you have no friends. Although I'll admit that living under a rock would certainly play a part.
  • by OneoFamillion ( 968420 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @07:37PM (#21106993)

    Fox pays $580 for myspace
    The Price Is Right.
  • by msimm ( 580077 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @07:56PM (#21107221) Homepage

    UPGRADE TO IE7



    There, now you don't have to feel left out.

  • by slyborg ( 524607 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @10:44PM (#21108741)
    Esp. if you're a vampire. Which is pretty likely on Facebook.

Real Programmers don't eat quiche. They eat Twinkies and Szechwan food.

Working...