BitTorrent, Inc. Acquires uTorrent 189
ColinPL writes "BitTorrent, Inc. has taken the next step — the acquisition of uTorrent. In a joint announcement made today, the two firms have publicly solidified the merger. 'Together, we are pleased to announce that BitTorrent, Inc. and uTorrent AB have decided to join forces ... BitTorrent has acquired uTorrent as it recognized the merits of uTorrent's exceptionally well-written codebase and robust user community. Bringing together uTorrent's efficient implementation and compelling UI with BitTorrent's expertise in networking protocols will significantly benefit the community with what we envision will be the best BitTorrent client.'"
This could turn bad... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
'Access to MP3s, Movies & much more. Fast, Anonymous, and Easy!'
One wonders if they got a tap on the shoulder 'get bought or you're screwed, we have new powerful friends'. It's a good codebase perhaps, but they've not exactly shown themselves to be trying to be legit.
That's not all (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
1. Make software with possible illegal uses
2. Become popular
3. ???? = sell out
4. Profit
5. Repeat
By selling out, you're getting money and limiting lawsuits that would involve you.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:This could turn bad... (Score:4, Informative)
It won't. It's BitTorrent, you already have no privacy. Your IP address is readily available to anyone who cares to look.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:This could turn bad... (Score:5, Interesting)
The same applies to this Bittorrent/uTorrent merger. So what if Mr Cohen takes Bittorrent in a direction we don't like ? Are we forced to follow ? Heck no. On the odd chance that this group actually creates something better, we're free to embrace their brainchild, or pass on it and look for the next cool thing.
What really grinds my gears though, is all the hubbub with the bittorrent "phenomenon". Seriously, what Mr Cohen has created is hardly any different from Kazaa or Napster, except for its so-called democracy. he's given everyone the freedom to easily spring up a tracker, which is really just an index server. So now instead of having one central hub that can be taken down, we have tens of thousands of puny little trackers that would require individual lawsuits to even try to take down, and no corporate entity behind them to pay "damages" to the litigators. Congrats! Give him a pat on the back for pulling off one of the first solid implementations of the painfully obvious evolution of decentralized file sharing. He didn't cure cancer, he didn't create peace in the middle east, he just took everyone's ideas and made them reality. Now move along, nothing more to see.
Re:This could turn bad... (Score:5, Interesting)
Face it, the reason BT is so popular is because it is incredibly well engineered. The use of torrent files rather than simple searches with small hash sets (necessary in order to allow search results to be transferred effectively) allows small partial blocks to be shared more effectively and robustly than any other P2P file transfer system has ever allowed. Decoupling search from file transfer has allowed different people to concentrate on different aspects of the problem and evolve their systems with no interdependency on network updates. The use of a centralised tracker rather than the currently-in-vogue decentralised alternatives (DHT, network search) to find sources results in substantially better transfer rates, with only a small reliability sacrifice. And with a DHT as a fallback, not even that.
Yes, none of these ideas were originally Cohen's. But as the first to combine them in a single application, I have nothing but respect for his work.
Re:This could turn bad... (Score:4, Informative)
Furthermore, the BitComet client had its history of acting like an asshole, ignoring tracker restrictions, not respecting private flags and so on. And that's just bad form.
Re: (Score:2)
So, which Bittorrent client is the best? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And since Sun is about to (has already?) open-source Java, expect to see similar speed improvements in the Java client on Windows soon, and thus im
Re:This could turn bad... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Bittorrent software is still free. (Score:2)
Fortunately, the original Bittorrent software is free software [gnu.org] so you'll always have the freedom to make sure the software preserves your privacy (insofar as that can be done on a Bittorrent network). The same cannot be said for uTorrent which will remain proprietary.
Ahhh... (Score:2, Insightful)
Now THAT programmer is someone who cares about quality.
irc chat log: with ludde and bram (Score:5, Informative)
Some answers from #uTorrent-questions:
-will uTorrent be ported to Linux?
probably
-how many lines of code is it comprised of?
~50-60K
-will encryption be removed?
no (answered by Bram)
-features most important to you (directed @ Bram)
low memory footprint, code size, cpu usage
-is there any thoughts to an osx client?
(Bram) we plan to produce an up to date osx client, but that's significant porting work
-are there any features that will be removed from uTorrent?
(Bram) we're leaving the uTorrent client mostly alone for now, on the grounds that people like it (further defined 'mostly' as in, not much of anything substantive will change)
-will uTorrent be replacing the original python client?
(Bram) we aren't announcing integration plan details right now
-Bram, are you talking with asus and other router makers for putting uTorent in there?
(Bram) we're talking to lots of people
-will uTorrent ever be open-sourced?
(Bram) not in the forseeable future, but we'll continue to maintain an open source reference implementation
-Bram, you said before that you're not a big fan of protocol header encryption... do you still stand behind this?
(Bram) it isn't much harder for an isp to recognize encrypted headers than unencrypted headers.
-will content be monitored?
(Bram) absolutly not
-does the uTorrent codebase compile on linux today (in your labs?)
(ludde) No
-ludde can't develop anything new for uTorrent?
(ludde) bittorrent inc will do the majority of the development work
-what IDE was uTorrent developed on?
(ludde) Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 with a few routines written in visual cobol. uTorrent was written in C++ with some tiny chunks of assembly
-will uTorrent continue to be free?
(Bram) utorrent will continue to be available and continue to be free (as in, no cost, not open source)
-Utorrent uses a lot of Windows API's right? Won't that be a problem when porting to *nux/OSX
(ludde) Yes, the UI is tightly bound to Windows APis, however, the core backend is easier to port.
(Bram) the utorrent UI is windows native, so porting that part to osx or linux is a significant amount of work (but planned to be done at some point)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I doubt he used the Visual COBOL IDE to write the assembly; in C++ (at least Microsoft's Visual Studio 6.0 flavor it it) you put your assembly in an __asm{} block. No need to boot another IDE.
But... I didn't know there was such a thing as Visual COBOL. Or that it worked without a tape reel.
Re: (Score:2)
The end? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:The end? (Score:5, Insightful)
I thought the very same thing when I read the title.
uTorrent was an awesome piece of software. It.just.worked. It was small, non-invasive, and non-evilware.
My heart sank.
I have no faith that this would be anything other than the death of uTorrent as a usable client.
(Same as winamp years ago, same as winternals, same as ... the list goes on.)
Oh well, which client does one use next?
Re: (Score:2)
How about continuing to use the current version of uTorrent? It works well, doesn't seem to have any major bugs, is likely to continue working adequately for the foreseeable future (as BT is a much less fast-changing protocol than some of the other systems, like Gnutella which regularly introduces network-changing new features, and ED2K where many servers will kick you off if you're using a client they deem to be "too old") and has all the features most of us actuall
Re: (Score:2)
How long is it going to take for people to make the connection between the practices that make the software industry miserable and closedness?
Leave it alone! (Score:1)
Oh god, leave it alone! uTorrent is perfect!
Re:Leave it alone! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
It's Open Source, written in Python, and the code is there for you to see.
Re:Leave it alone! (Score:4, Informative)
Shut down the uTorrent central server, and you've effectively halved (or worse) everyone's download/upload speed.
It's a serious problem; if it happens there could be an alternate server, but it would require third party hacks.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not true.
Well, that's true that the "private" trackers (i.e. tree-houses for pimple-faced "leet" pricks who want to feel better about themselves while getting thoroughly suckered by the site owner) do demand that you durn DHT off. But that is because with DHT and peer exchange, their "private" little clubs would soon join the public swarm of peers with that torrent they are trying to squirrel away. The DHT does not affect the "share ratio" of the person who had it on to the exclusion to all else, but inst
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I regularly get ~500kB/s downloads from public trackers. Yes, I also get 20kB/s. That's life. But moaning about how us, dirty unwashed masses, always get 30kB/s all the time just paints you as a spoiled, whining elitist in search of "special" treatment.
Which you are.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No. Private trackers are designed to restrict sharing to the "in" group. In essence they are the equivalent of private clubs where one needs to know a secret handshake to get in, the whole point of course being to make their vain, empty headed members feel "superior" to all those outside. Sharing is far more efficient when it is wide open to participation, even if there are those who mis
Re: (Score:2)
There's no need to turn off DHT completely to do that, uTorrent allows you to turn it off on a per-torrent basis.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Shut down the uTorrent central server, and you've effectively halved (or worse) everyone's download/upload speed.
Not quite. It uses router.utorrent.com to bootstrap into the DHT network. But if it already has known nodes (e.g. saved from the previous session) then it wouldn't 'phone home' as you call it. The whole purpose of the Kademlia DHT feature is to be decentralized, i.e. without the need for a central
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
BTW - I'm a full time Ubuntu user, and still run uTorrent. It's much better than anything available on Linux, as far as I've found. KTorrent is nice, but not very fast, and Azureus is a horrid pig. uTorrent runs fine through Wine, though.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
on IRC (Score:5, Informative)
With you kind permission ... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Open source, very small (473 kb), looks promising.
Re: (Score:2)
Unlike the 'console' version, It provides a nice display of current upload and download rates and a progress bar. It doesn't seem to support m
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Rtorrent [rakshasa.no] is by far the torrent client with the smallest footprint.
I tried them all to get one that worked on a 486 with 60MB RAM and no X. Rtorrent (with ncurses ui) was the only one that didn't max out the resources.
Now I can turn my 4Ghz energy hog off at night, and do my downloading on the 486, which uses about as much electricity as a light bulb.
(For ed2k on the same machine I use mldonkey [sourceforge.net].
Re: (Score:2)
Alternatively, you could use a modern Mini-ITX machine or laptop as your only machine. It would consume about the same power as the 486 while being much more powerful as a computer.
I admit it's pretty cool that you can make use of a 486, but it's not the best solution for saving energy.
Re: (Score:2)
I admit it's pretty cool that you can make use of a 486, but it's not the best solution for saving energy.
I don't think your idea would actually improve his energy consumption. I don't have a 486 to test with, but some of my older Pentium systems use only ~40W fully running and loaded. My laptop uses about 80W in this state.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think your idea would actually improve his energy consumption. I don't have a 486 to test with, but some of my older Pentium systems use only ~40W fully running and loaded. My laptop uses about 80W in this state. I don't have a Mini-ITX system to test with, but suspect that the processor alone would consume than his entire 486 PC.
My laptop has a 1.6 GHz Pentium M, and the power supply is rated at 60 watts max. I've undervolted the processor so it should consume even less. Of course, most of the time it's not fully loaded.
Remember that 486's were passively cooled. There's a reason they could get away with that.
So is my Mini-ITX machine (VIA Nehemiah 1 GHz). The total max consumption of the machine is somewhere around 60 watts as well (it has a 80 watt laptop-style power supply), not counting the LCD. Most of the time it's only running as a server and the display is blanked.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Be warned, though: I hear that Azureus is going
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, if they make something that sux, we can still use the current Azureus. And it's GPL, so people can still continue to improve it
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
You can't display the micro symbol at ./? (Score:1)
There's Goes the Neighborhood (Score:4, Insightful)
Reminds me of the time when Microsoft couldn't compete with another x86 assembler on the market. They bought it out, and rather than use it to replace the relatively awful MASM, killed it instead.
Will uTorrent face the same fate? Can we all make money by writing a better BT than BT and taking money for it afterwards now?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
MASM was never best of breed. Not until it was the only breed left.
And as for your cheap shot of putting down Microsoft because they're Microsoft, I only put them down when they deserve it -- and killing a superior product deserves it. I don't have to
Back up your copies (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Back up your copies (Score:4, Informative)
Free PHP web based torrent - Plug (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why is anyone surprised? (Score:5, Interesting)
From what I remember, Bram always viewed the Python/core as a sort of "reference implementation" -- it was never his goal to make the Python client or tracker the end-all be-all.
Why is it then surprising that he'd want to bring on a client that doesn't have to be Open Source, and thus doesn't have to be clean and perfect, but is still sexy as hell? He still keeps his reference implementation that supports the features and is easy to reimplement a dozen times in two dozen languages
Remember that his goal since incorporating has been to legitimize and broaden the adoption of BT. A sexy client is a huge step towards that goal. It's not like Sony or the MPAA or whomever is going to distribute a customized version of Azureus any time soon -- it's a beast! But a custom version of uTorrent? A 1MB executable that you could throw on a CD that requires zero install? YTF not? Remember also that Strigeus has been working towards licensing out the core engine for uTorrent.
Plate. Shrimp. Plate of Shrimp.
Some of you are excessively paranoid. You know that, right?
(Yes, yes, I know: "Welcome to Slashdot".)
Re: (Score:2)
But under this new regime I assume they'll charge for torrents of the latest & greatest movies, yes? Now what's to stop me using this shiny new official client to grab the latest release off the scene, probably before it's available via BituTorrent? Surely this would be a big problem for the Man. Except, what if Bram extended his promise to wipe out infringing content - what if there was a way of ripping up unauthorised torrents in new-u-torren
Re: (Score:2)
There is nothing wrong with movie companies charging for their product. There is something wrong with movie companies charging for a crippled and limited versions of their product. there is a differnce. If the movie companies want to toss their conent out there, I say more power to them and there are worse ways to do it than through uTorrent. I would be happy to drop $2 or whatever for fast, good quality copies of episodes for series I like as t
Re: (Score:2)
Just to correct your apparent misapprehension -- uTorrent is substantially smaller than 1MB. The version I have installed is less than 200K.
Explanation request (Score:4, Interesting)
Now, when I read people saying they don't trust (sic) Bram Cohen and that they will no longer update utorrent, or that this will be a bad thing, I don't really understand why they are worried. Is it for technical reasons? Do you fear utorrent will stop being tiny _if_ it's made multiplatform? What motivates that fear? Something from the past that I missed? Or is it because of the deal between Cohen and the MPAA? If so, why do you consider it bad? Do you fear the bittorrent protocol and official implementation will suffer because of that deal and that same situation will extend to utorrent? Honest questions, really. Please, englighten me.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I think the fear is that the featureful, small uTorrent client the world loves will now be "improved" to provide fast dollars for the new owners. And how do you do that these days? Stuff advertsing into your product, turn off advanced features and produce a "pro" version, "encourage" your community to download your commercial stuff, and when they resist then automatically "upgrade" their client for them to follow the new "strategic direction".
The uTorrent community is the bigges
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Azuerus
Will they make uTorrent Free? (Score:2)
Snore! (Score:2)
stop the madness! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
List of Things to Do... (Score:2)
1. Open uTorrent
2. Click on Options
3. Click on Preferences
4. Untick "Check for updates automatically"
5. ???
6. Profit.
qbittorrent (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Azureus (Score:5, Informative)
On the other hand, uTorrent does just about every damn thing most people need and it does it in 1/10th the CPU usage and 1/100th the memory usage of Azureus.
I like never having to worry about whether my torrent program is running in the background while I'm doing foreground tasks so I love uTorrent. I just leave it on all the time, running away, and never even notice it while I'm playing NWN2 or editing photos or watching videos or whatever. And that's the big win.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
utorrent is 170k, doesn't need installing and is lightning quick on huge torrents.
Re: (Score:2)
On my machine, Azureus uses ~80MB of memory; uTorrent uses about 20MB. That's memory I want to use for other things.
Azureus has very slow UI updates. Sometimes I wait for several seconds to get control back after doing something. This is a problem I've never had with uTorrent.
Azureus uses about 30-40% of my CPU time when its maxing out my connection. uTorrent less than 10%.
Azureus doesn't have a single feature that I want that i
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I've never heard of anyone using it for that reason. Personally, I use it primarily for it's feature-set and small footprint, and its on that basis that I recommend it to others.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:bleh (Score:4, Informative)
Not that I wouldn't mind taking a look at that codebase. You know, just for curiosity's sake.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
1. Make uTorrent as feature-rich as the official client
2. Add more partner-sponsored addons during installation that are checked by default
3. Profit!
(There is no "???" step since this model seems to actually work)
Re: (Score:2)
This idea that every programmer that does something way cool somehow owes the community his source code is just silly.
I can't speak for everybody, but I feel that this is a mis-characterization of those that prefer Free software. For me each software package is a value proposition. Well functioning software that runs quickly and has a small footprint has value to me. Software that gives me the 4 basic freedoms also has value to me. For me, the 4 freedoms usually carry more value than a small footpri
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
(on the other hand, if its as good as it is, despite using VCobol, he's an excellent programmer. Masochistic, but excellent
Re: (Score:2)
But you know, once word of this gets out bank programmers are going to be insufferable.
Re: (Score:2)