10 Terrible Portrayals of Technology in Film 745
Luke Hachmeister writes to mention a light piece at GideonTech on some of the truly terrible portrayals of technology in film. From Hackers to AntiTrust, Hollywoood just can't stick to reality. From the article: "Harrison Ford plays a security expert at a bank. He falls prey to a scheme to steal money for a gang that has taken hostage of his family. The film tried very hard to keep it a rollercoaster ride of thrills. From the beginning, you have Harrison Ford typing furiously to stop a hacker by writing new firewall rules. At least this time, these rules didn't float around in a rainbow of colors ala Hackers. What really puts Firewall at the top of the list, is the dumbest and non-believable use of an iPod to date. This is 2006, not 1995, you can't just make stuff up like this anymore. In the middle of the film, Harrison Ford happens to not only be a security expert, but an Apple hardware developer too."
Fantastic (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I think the all time classic is........ (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Hell yeah. Worst list ever (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Uhh... (Score:5, Informative)
So we could possibly explain that bit in Jurassic Park entirely if "this is UNIX!" girl had at some point in the year or so before the events of the film simply visited Disneyworld.
A mirror, but only the first page. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Mirror (Score:2, Informative)
Re:not a surprise, really (Score:3, Informative)
That all depends on what they're hit with. Take a shot from a
Re:Bah (Score:4, Informative)
Link does not work:Who is the admin (Score:2, Informative)
Could not connect to the MySQL Server
Re:Bah (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Hell yeah. Worst list ever (Score:5, Informative)
Yeah, that could be something to do with the bit at the top of the article where they said they were deliberately excluding all science fiction movies.
Re:HACKERS WAS THE GREATEST FILE EVAR!! (Score:3, Informative)
Uh, around the early '90s I saw a few laptops on sale with a single PCI slot. It was on the base, parallel to the keyboard, with the back plate attached to the side of the case allowing extra ports at the back of the right hand side of the case. You could use it to add things like SCSI, or extra video out, that were not present in most laptops and needed more bandwidth than 16-bit PCMCIA.
These days, miniPCI is more common, and newer machines use ExpressCard (which includes PCIe) for the same purpose.
Re:This was 1993 (Score:3, Informative)
Minix was around for about $50 (with a book) and ran on an 8086. I recall that my father's (small) company had an old UNIX box of some description (with a 20MB hard disk!) even though they were a primarily Windows and embedded systems shop.
386BSD was released in March 1992. GNU had been around for almost a decade and there were early versions of Linux floating around that could probably have been used by it.
Re:Hell yeah. Worst list ever (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Office Space (Score:2, Informative)
If you enjoy this... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Link does not work:Who is the admin (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Bah (Score:2, Informative)
For those with short attention spans, the trailer is here [remote-films.com]. Don't miss the killing of clippy, it's priceless.
Re:Bah (Score:3, Informative)
They sort-of did. It was called Salmon Days: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/01/08/salmon_da
The salmondays.tv site, however, seems to have been replaced with something not entirely (or at all) suitable for work, so I didn't stick around to see if the original trailer was still there.
Re:Funny as hell (Score:2, Informative)
MCP was an actual OS (Score:3, Informative)
Alan Kay consulted for Tron, and he was quite a fan of the Burroughs; the tagged-data architecture the Burroughs used (a precursor to a similar idea used in Lisp Machines), and the code+data storage method on another Burroughs machine, the 220, both influenced the way Smalltalk and object-oriented programming developed.
By the way, the MCP lives on today, in the Unisys ClearPath architecture. Remember that next time you go to the bank or make an ATM withdrawal (due to their legendary stability, MCP systems were widely used by financial institutions).
Re:Any detective series (Score:3, Informative)
Computer interfaces in movies and television are often nothing more than special effects. Often the performer interacting with the screen is observing a completely green screen, or a black one with white crosses in the corner. The interface is added in post production as part of the compositing pass. So it ends up being nothing more than graphics. Even the sounds of the keystrokes will be added in later.
Having said that, in films where the interface is used frequently, or in television series where the interface persists over a season or entire series, you may well see custom interfaces created. Stargate, Earth Final Conflict, and CSI are all examples that spring to mind - the interface for a Companion Protectors wrist device needs to stay consistent, so custom software is often created to generate the basic look and feel of the screen. Mind you, I don't profess to know whether programmed interfaces actually were used for the shows I named, but if I were the VFX supervisor for these shows I likely would have had something made to at least generate the basic interfaces.
I did do some work on a few shows in Vancouver where we employed a programmer to create custom interfaces. He had a toolkit of his own making he used to rapidly prototype UI's. This was at least 10 years ago, and flash was not up to the task at the time. I frequently used powerpoint on the same show, and all the performer had to do was press space to advance to the next screen. That technique was reserved for directors and or actors who were uncomfortable reacting to something that wasn't there. In many cases we would end up replacing the practical interface in post production anyways.
The advantage to the powerpoint approach was that modifing the application to suit changes or rewrites was possible on set between takes, a fact which came in handy several times.
Programmed interfaces are a lot more resistant to fast changes on the sort of deadlines series work often has. I should state though that it's been years since I last did interface work. Faced with the same tasks nowadays, I would likely consider flash much more closely, to obtain a more modern and dynamic interface. Whether it would be used would depend on how flexible and predictable the development and prototyping tools are.