A Triple-Standard Disk 210
On the heels of the news of Toshiba's proposed double-standard disk comes word that Warner Brothers engineers have applied for a patent on a triple-standard disk. The new disk would offer HD-DVD and Blu-Ray on one side and standard DVD on the other. From the article: "Warner's plan is to create a disk with a Blu-ray top layer that works like a two-way mirror. This should reflect just enough blue light for a Blu-ray player to read it okay. But it should also let enough light through for HD-DVD players to ignore the Blu-ray recording and find a second HD-DVD layer beneath." See the patent application, filed last month.
Or they could... (Score:3, Insightful)
[...]
Naaah. That's too easy.
Not buying it. (Score:2, Insightful)
let me get this straight (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Or they could... (Score:5, Insightful)
You aren't thinking nearly evil enough to be a film studio.
Who cares what you think? (Score:2, Insightful)
Err, HD capable sets are doing just fine without PS3 and if you're fine with your NTSC signal on your 27" tv, then more power to you. However, just because YOU don't think it's worth it, just because YOU don't see a need to watch HD content doesn't mean squat for the rest of the populace. Fact is, lots of people are plunking money down for new tv's that are capable of playing HD, you the manufs don't really care about.
BTW, the largest set in my house is a 27", but it gets used maybe 1/10th the amount that our 21" tv is. So I'm just as much a luddite as you. But it's obvious that every passing day, you and I are increasingly the minority.
Re:Or they could... (Score:5, Insightful)
Just saying.
Tom
Should? (Score:5, Insightful)
So they really haven't figured out how to do it? So what they file the patent hope they can figure it out and if not hope someone else does so they can sue them?
These discs may open some doors (Score:5, Insightful)
If I was a movie studio executive, I would support these triple-layer discs at any cost.
Re:Who cares what you think? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:let me get this straight (Score:3, Insightful)
Like I said, cynic speaking.
Designing in the margins of a older spec -- NOT! (Score:4, Insightful)
Oh, this sounds like just a wunnerful guarantee of problem-free operation on all the drives, Blu-ray or HD-DVD, that were designed and produced with really tight tolerances before this mutant format was conceived. No problems with marginal signals at all, nosireee, we promise.
-k
Re:Or they could... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Or they could... (Score:5, Insightful)
I can't help but wonder (Score:5, Insightful)
How much of a scratch would it take to mangle the BluRay data that is being read off this semi-transparent layer. I thought those were pretty sensitive to start with.
How about the stability? Will any of the optical properties change over time of any of the several compononts involved? Will your new Disney disc last til your kid is out of elementary school?
All sounds like trouble waiting to happen to me.
Especially as the patent included a lot of SHOULDs to start with
oh well, pretty much a mental exercise as i am not going for either one for quite some time.
Wow (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Or they could... (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Or they could... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Who cares what you think? (Score:3, Insightful)
So where's the market for Bluray and HD-DVD now? DVD looks fabulous at 720p, it already has the resolution for that. Why do I need HD-DVD or Bluray? I think they have plenty of time to work out a resolution for this. If a dual layer disc with both formats is the ticket, fine. Just don't make me pay the freakin' royalties for each format on each disc I buy. I'm not paying $40-50 dollars to buy a movie. And while I'm on the subject of 'not paying for', I don't think the HD players are going to really become sellable until they are under $200 with low end models under $100. If they want to replace DVD they are going to have to make it so that it's not worth it to pay just a little bit less for DVD.