The RIAA vs. John Doe, a Layperson's Guide 78
Grant Robertson writes to tell us that he has made a pass at translating a recent guide to surviving an RIAA lawsuit from technical lawyer-speak into a much more easy to understand layperson's guide. The law, being complex and sometimes cryptic, allows ways for the RIAA to tilt the odds in their favor forcing unsuspecting victims to settle rather than fight. Take a look at Ray Beckerman's tips to survival translated into words anyone can benefit from.
More such as this. (Score:5, Interesting)
Its like contracts...I read them. Over and Over again...it doesn;t mean I understand what they mean. We all need pet solicitors.
Re:More such as this. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:More such as this. (Score:3, Funny)
There... fixed it for ya.
Re:More such as this. (Score:2)
Dismissing it all as "babble" may sound like fun, but it's babble that affects people's lives, so we should all try to understand it. And I think reading the judges' "babble" -- rather than reading others babbling on about it -- is the best way to understand what is really going on.
In this particular area, sophisticated tech people who read the judges' decisions are immediately aware that the judges don't know what they're talking about, and that the RIAA lawyers are deliberately trying to play on that an
Re:More such as this. (Score:1, Funny)
2. Kill RIAA Lawyer
3. Argue that it wasn't homocide as lawyers aren't human anyways
4. Spend 10-20 years with free room and board.
For much the same reason... (Score:2)
I've often thought programmers and lawyers have similar jobs.
Re:More such as this. (Score:1)
Re:More such as this. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:More such as this. (Score:2)
Unfortunately, there really aren't any good options.
1. Pay an extortionate settlement.
2. Represent yourself which is hard and stressful and not the best way to defend a case.
3. Pay lots of money to a lawyer and pray you might get some of your attorneys fees back at the end.
Normal options, like reasoning with the other side and getting them to go away, or to take a reasonable settlement, don't work here.
I was hoping to be able to knock out the cases at the John Doe stage, but the 3 motions we made in
This John Doe guy had it coming IMO. (Score:2, Funny)
I hope they sue his ass off.
Re:This John Doe guy had it coming IMO. (Score:2)
Well... (Score:5, Interesting)
Still the main piece of advice he gives -- immediately get a lawyer who knows what he's doing with regard to these sorts of cases -- is good advice. Waiting too long, or going without one for a while can irrevocably screw up your defense if you don't do the right things, in the right order, at the right times.
Re:Well... (Score:2)
Now, you seem to know more about legal stuff than I, but are there many lawyers who would have had experience in John Doe suits with no evidence which are being filed in a state the person isn't even a
Re:Well... (Score:2)
Maybe not but at the very least the lawyer will be very familiar with things like filing dates and court proceedings so you at least can make sure the administrivia are taken care of properly (some judges look very unkindly on people who don't get their paperwork right and at least the lawyer ca
Re:Well... (Score:2)
The only easy place to quash this tactic is to stop the suit against John Doe. But, since they drop that suit as soon as they have your ISP billing info, it's all over.
I really like the summary judgement idea. You force the lawyers to produce filenames, IP addresses, dates, times, and ISP connection records.
Send it to all the judges !! (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Send it to all the judges !! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Send it to all the judges !! (Score:1)
I am less than a layman (Score:5, Interesting)
However, I would be grateful to know how this compares with the RIAA's attempts in other nations, especially here in the UK. TFA did allude to Canada and The Netherlands but only a mention. Some of the tactics outlined did seem to be only possible in the US (in particular the limitations of state laws)
Re:I am less than a layman (Score:1)
Re:I am less than a layman (Score:2)
That's right,digitrev. In Canada and the Netherlands they recognized that the RIAA's "investigation" was fake and felt the evidence wasn't sufficient to warrant giving out confidential information.
In the U.S. they seem to have rubberstamped the RIAA tactics.
Although I wonder if there's some judge out there who laughed them out of court.... but hasn't been heard from because the case was ex parte.
Re:I am less than a layman (Score:1)
Re:I am less than a layman (Score:1)
IANAL, but I think that:
Here in Denmark they will have to pay everyones expenses, even the Courts, if and only if the Court rules that the suit was baseless.
Re:I am less than a layman (Score:2)
That really stinks.
Re:I am less than a layman (Score:2)
Re:I am less than a layman (Score:2)
Can I just ask, this only applies to cases that relate to the Copyright Act? So people can still be sued and have to pay their own fees to prove, they haven't done anything wrong and yet have to pay massive legal fees, if the case is not about copyright?
Bye the way, we do attack and make many jokes at lawyers, but I at least do understand that lawyers are supposed to be there to defend the r
Re:I am less than a layman (Score:2)
Re:I am less than a layman (Score:1)
Re:I am less than a layman (Score:2)
Useful guide, but not to survival (Score:5, Insightful)
1) You're going to lose a motion and not be told how or why
2) You're going to be sent legal documents but will not be able to get a lawyer to defend you because the lawyer won't have the information he needs
3) You're going to have your information handed over to the RIAA and there's nothing you can do
4) You're going to land in a civil case and the precendents are murky enough that you may well lose, but it's certainly going to cost you a bundle anyway
What I'd like to see is a real survival guide on the back of this. For example, when you get the notice that you've lost that first motion, what should you do? What can your lawyer do to get up to speed and file a motion to dismiss in time? What can you present to the judge to show that the case, on the evidence to hand, is baseless?
Good article, and a great starting point, but it'd be so much more useful with some real advice rather than just being a well-written explanation of exactly how screwed you are.
Re:Useful guide, but not to survival (Score:3, Informative)
1. FAST !!!!
2. Knows about the RIAA tactics.
Re:Useful guide, but not to survival (Score:2)
Great. Now explain how to find such a lawyer.
Re:Useful guide, but not to survival (Score:2)
Let's see... Well, in the blog you can find the name of two people that got out of their lawsuit. I am sure that 5 minutes alone with Google will allow you to find the name of their lawyers...
That said, 'please' would have been welcome
Re:Useful guide, but not to survival (Score:2)
That would be great, if they lived (and were licensed to practice) in my state. I'm kind of thinking along the lines of something useful to people that live in the other 48 states. More than 2 lawyers would be required for that I would imagine.
Re:Useful guide, but not to survival (Score:1)
I'm not in the Netherlands, I'm in Denmark (is there something rotten here?) so the survival advice is probable a bit different. However, I still might need a lawyer with relevant knowledge, so perhaps have countries as well as states in the list? Still, I would like to see a clear
Re:Useful guide, but not to survival (Score:3, Interesting)
I tend to a somewhat different take on things:
1 The RIAA only has to show that is more reasonable than not to believe that you downloading without a purchase or uploading without a license to distribute.
2 The chances are pretty damn good that you or someone in your household has been making heavy use of BT and the P2P nets. It's your account and your responsibil
Re:Useful guide, but not to survival (Score:3, Interesting)
1 is completely wrong. Under no interpetation of copyright law can they bring a lawsuit against you for illegal downloading. None at all.
Your confusion is understandable, however, as every single news story gets this wrong, talking about 'p2p downloaders', when, even if it was demonstrated that they were downloaders, that wouldn't be the slightest bit illegal. It's akin to calling muggers 'pants owners'...almost all muggers do, indeed, own a pair of pants, and even use it during the commision of a crime, b
Re:Useful guide, but not to survival (Score:1)
If they could show that you purposefully downloaded a song that you knew to be copyrighted and that you also knew the person supplying you with the song was not authorized to distribute that song, you would still be guilty of willfully violating copyright laws.
I don't know of any law under which they could do that. Seriously. Just because something seems 'wrong', or is the other half of an illegal act, doesn't make it illegal. It's not legal to build or sell a house in violation of various building codes
Re:Useful guide, but not to survival (Score:2)
Shut up, man! Don't give them any ideas! That is the only avenue by which I can (without fear of ridicule) listen to such classics as "Popozao".
Re:Useful guide, but not to survival (Score:1)
It is rather surreal, isn't it?
People ask me where to get music online, and I have no idea what the current p2p thing is. They ask where I got my music from, and usually don't believe me that XXXREDACTEDXXX even exists until I show them.
They can sue and they can win (Score:2)
August 8th. This AP story just in: Family owes $4,080 for music download-- Oregonians say they didn't know practice was illegal [nwsource.com]
KLAMATH FALLS, Ore. -- Leslie Maxfield has got a case of the downloading blues.834 rock and country songs. With a Saturday deadline approaching, Maxfield has yet to pay the settlement, and he's not sure if he can. "I've got about a week and they'll be wanting their
Re:They can sue and they can win (Score:1)
I think that says it all.
my RIAA survival guide (Score:3, Funny)
Re:my RIAA survival guide (Score:3, Funny)
Re:my RIAA survival guide (Score:1)
No, the Chewbacca defense!
Re:my RIAA survival guide (Score:3, Funny)
Re:my RIAA survival guide (Score:2)
RIAA Honeypot (Score:1)
Re:RIAA Honeypot (Score:3, Informative)
Re:RIAA Honeypot (Score:4, Interesting)
I am curious about the "baiting a lawsuit" bit. Could you point me to some law and/or cases(USA based)? I think a RIAA Honeypot could be an interesting. A network of them passing files around would be even more interesting.
If the copyright on the file the RIAA downloads belongs to another, are they now infriging that copyright and can the copyright owner sue them?
Re:RIAA Honeypot (Score:2)
Re:RIAA Honeypot (Score:2)
So, you're just talking out of your ass then? No actual law or case examples that you can point me to?
Thanks for the help.
Re:RIAA Honeypot (Score:2)
How about a preemptive strike? Send a letter via registered mail to the attorney of record for the RIAA explaining what you are doing before you actually start doing it. Something along the lines of "I am researching P2P behavior & traffic and I am using bogus files with file titles of popular songs."
Months later if/when the RIAA brings a lawsuit against you, send them an affidavit via registered mail reminding them
Re:RIAA Honeypot (Score:2)
Re:RIAA Honeypot (Score:2)
Maybe you could enlighten me on how letters sent to the RIAA explaining one's actions and intents would be dismissed as "heresay"?
hersay [thefreedictionary.com] n. 1) second-hand evidence in which the witness is not telling what he/she knows personally, but what others have said to him/her. 2) a common objection made by the opposing lawyer to testimony, when it appears the witness has violated the hearsay rule. 3) scuttlebutt or gossip.
No nee
Re:RIAA Honeypot (Score:2)
From the brief "Where, as here, one of these innocent defendants prevails in clearing her name and the plaintiff knew or should have known that she was innocent but continued to harass the defendant, the court should award attorney's fees to compens
Re:RIAA Honeypot (Score:1)
Re:RIAA Honeypot (Score:1)
Rumsfeld vs. Sagan (Score:4, Interesting)
Sad that Rumsfeld is getting credit for it, when the idea actually comes from the original BHA [wikipedia.org], Carl Sagan:
http://www.fatemag.com/wordpress/?p=103 [fatemag.com]
Dissemination! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Dissemination! (Score:2)
We recently served some followup interrogatories [blogspot.com] in UMG v. Lindor, in Brooklyn federal court, trying to get to the bottom of the RIAA's evasiveness.
Re:Dissemination! (Score:1)
The link says -- "...the 'evidentiary basis' for their allegation of copyright infringement, she received only a vague response." It is extremely important to clarify this! Just what are people being charged with by the RIAA? The mass media has consistently ignored this issue and said, in essence, people are being charged with downloading copyrighted material.
Can't be right -- for several reasons.
I'm not sure downloading copyrighted music is actually a crime. Is it?
The RIAA has to be charging peop
Re:Dissemination! (Score:2)
1. The complaint charges them with "downloading, distributing, and/or making available for distribution". In fact the RIAA has no evidence at all of downloading or distributing when they commence the case.
2. I am not aware of any criminal cases. The cases I am aware of are all civil cases, for money damages and an injunction.
3. There is huge potential for mistakes. Their investigation is bogus, and they have no idea when they sue someone if that person has committed any act of copyright infringement whats
I'm surprised nobody's cashed in on this (Score:2)
The best way to stop an RIAA lawsuit in its tracks is to get a lawyer in the ISP's home state to file a motion to dismiss the suit, right? So it'd be really useful if there were a directory online of lawyers who can do that for each state.
It strikes me as easy money all around. The lawyers would make a couple of hundred bucks a pop for basically filling out some paperwork, whoever runs the web directory would get part of that from the lawyers and the poor schmuck who's being sued would end up paying a co
Re:I'm surprised nobody's cashed in on this (Score:4, Interesting)
I've been trying to build such a directory of lawyers who are fighting the RIAA:
http://info.riaalawsuits.us/directory.htm [riaalawsuits.us]
My list tries to include only lawyers who will definitely fight, rather than try to steer you to settling.
And the EFF has a broader list of lawyers who have expressed an interest in helping the defendants:
http://subpoenadefense.org/legal.htm [subpoenadefense.org]
I think the original sources are the best reading (Score:5, Interesting)
Personally, I think (a) the people at Slashdot are a pretty intelligent lot, and (b) the best things for them to read are not what a commentator has to say, but the actual court records.
I have seen some spirited, high-level debates in these pages where people cite to different parts of different litigation documents.
That is why my site is the way it is; it is information, not entertainment. The key elements are (a) the index of litigation documents; (b) the directory of lawyers who are fighting the RIAA; and (c) the posts highlighting significant level events. The post, How the RIAA Litigation Process Works [riaalawsuits.us], which Grant Robertson describes as being as 'dry as a bread sandwich', is merely intended to be an accurate summary of what is going on out there, not a substitute for informing onesself and forming one's own opinions. (I hope punkr0x is right, that it is not quite as poorly written as Grant makes it out to be.).
My site is intended to serve the following readers: (a) people who are being targeted by the RIAA; (b) lawyers who are representing or would like to represent these folks; (c) journalists looking for primary rather than secondary sources; and (d) other intelligent people, lawyers and nonlawyers alike, who want to understand what is happening here, and who don't need to be told what to think.
I think the 'laymen' at Slashdot are pretty good readers.
I know it may sound ridiculous, but I'm serious (Score:1)
A question for the uber-cool and helpful NY Country Lawyer: Would you think you might get Allenwood or some other minimum security prison? Or would I be doin the Tango with some crosseyed murderer in a supermax (living one cell over from the Deadhead who got caught
Re:I know it may sound ridiculous, but I'm serious (Score:2)
Re:I know it may sound ridiculous, but I'm serious (Score:1)
What I meat to ask was, what would happen if one were to just thumb their nose at the whole demand for money, lawsuit, etc...
I feel pretty Thoreau about the whole thing.....
Re:I know it may sound ridiculous, but I'm serious (Score:2)
Usually if one ignores the suit, one winds up with a default judgment against onesself.