Google Announces Open Source Repository 229
NewsForge (also owned by OSTG) has word of Google's newest product: an open-source project repository. Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier sat down for a talk with Greg Stein and Chris DiBona, who say that the product is very similar to sites like SourceForge but is not intended to compete with them. From the article: "Instead, Stein says that the goal is to see what Google can do with the Google infrastructure, to provide an alternative for open source projects. DiBona says that it's a 'direct result of Greg concentrating on what open source projects need. Most bugtrackers are informed by what corporations' and large projects need, whereas Google's offering is just about what open source developers need. Stein says that Google's hosting has a 'brand new look' at issue tracking that may be of interest to open source projects, and says 'nobody else out there is doing anything close to it.'"
Re:SourceForge is easy to beat (Score:5, Informative)
Re:No Public Domain (Score:4, Informative)
Actual news on slashdot (Score:3, Informative)
Greg just mentioned that a downloads features will be coming to Google Code Hosting.
Let's see what they do (Score:5, Informative)
It will be interesting to see what direction they take it.
Re:What the catch? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:SourceForge is easy to beat (Score:2, Informative)
Yes, I say give credit where credit is due..in this case should credit Linus for the quote.
Re:Beating SF ... (Score:5, Informative)
SourceForge.net and Google Code (Score:5, Informative)
Re:No Public Domain (Score:1, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
alternative (Score:3, Informative)
Re:One of the best things they could do is... (Score:2, Informative)
Don't blame google; blame the link spammers.
Re:Beating SF ... (Score:2, Informative)
Yeah, for a developer-oriented site, we should be far more understanding of folks using wget.
Thx,
Ross
Bah! Kids nowadays... (Score:1, Informative)
Now git off my lawn or'll stick the dawg on yer!
BSD does NOT "have this advertising clause" (Score:3, Informative)
See: ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.Li
Re:Reluctantly, I find myself agreeing (Score:5, Informative)
I'm an architect at SourceForge.net and I designed and implemented the search functionality that is currently running on the site. I take any complaints about the quality of the search results quite seriously. From I've seen, most of our users are quite happy with the latest revision of the search engine (launched in April of this year). However, if you could give me specific search terms that are returning poor results and some examples of what you think it should be returning I'd be happy to look into it to see if there is a bug in the search or statistics engines producing the poor results. My SF.net username is the same as my
Thanks,
--Chris
Re:Reluctantly, I find myself agreeing (Score:4, Informative)
Why is "Moon Secure Antivirus", with rank at 28,000, no files, 0 downloads, registered this year, and only 82% activity considered more relevant than ClamAV?
That's just not helpful! I'd rather not see something that has zero downloads but has more occurances of "antivirus" in the description (or whatever contributed to the relevancy score).
Yes, I can change the sort order. But why make me jump through hoops to wade throug these low-quality projects?
Sourceforge quality (Score:4, Informative)
I have a collegue who is one of the submittors to JRuby. He told me they had huge problems with Sourceforge last 6 months. Servers were down all the time, which slowed down development. I blieve they almost didn't get the demo finished before Java ONE because of this, and now they have moved to CodeHaus [codehaus.org] instead. Subversion, JIRA for bug tracking, and so far very stable servers, so they are very pleased.
Re:No Public Domain (Score:3, Informative)
In belgium for example you will allways remain the copyright holder until the copyright expires (a while afther your death). In other words: you simply can't put your own creations in the public domain.
That's why licences are important: you need a legal base for distributing your work.
Re:Reluctantly, I find myself agreeing (Score:4, Informative)
Thanks for pointing that out. I'll admit, Moon Secure Antivirus might not be the best candidate for the first result, but the result set returned isn't that bad. ClamAV is the second result and it appears to me that several other results on the first page are pretty good. And in this case it looks like the differentiator was simply that Moon Secure AV has "antivirus" in their project description more often.
We are looking for ways to improve how we rank the relevancy of a project. Before your post I hadn't thought about using the registration date as a metric. Making projects listed on the site longer more relevant by a little bit isn't a bad idea and I may try playing with the tuning settings on my development machine to see what happens.
I do think saying we're making you jump through hoops is a little over the top, the results don't seem to me to be as bad as you're making them out to be. And the improved UI makes it easy for you to scan the results and reject them the way you did. But I certainly don't want to downplay your problems, so please keep providing feedback so we can continue to improve the site. The development team is very motivated to make the user experience on SourceForge.net as good as we possibly can.
--Chris