Turning Network Free-Riders' Lives Upside Down 658
An anonymous reader writes "You discover that your neighbours are using your unsecured wireless network without your permission. Do you secure it? Or do you do something more fun? A few minutes with squid and iptables could greatly improve your neighbours' Web experience ..." Improve is a relative term, but this is certainly gentler than certain other approaches.
Liability? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Goats (Score:5, Interesting)
If you let your signal spill over onto other people's space, too bad.
In fact, I wouldn't be mad if someone were using my connection without my approval unless they were encroaching on my space to do it. In fact, I only secured it because of bandwidth concerns and the potential for other people to use it for illicit purposes.
Should be legal (Score:5, Interesting)
Missing the point, I think (Score:4, Interesting)
If your wireless network is unsecured, permission to use it is implied, and there are operating systems that will automatically use such networks, are there not?
getting biblical on the neighbours (Score:4, Interesting)
You can have a lot of phun with this all-in-one cracker suite. Hell, if my neighbours had a MS-SQL server or Cisco switch I could have 0wned those too!
Secure? (Score:4, Interesting)
If you plan to take on others, make sure your own stuff is secure.
Re:Missing the point, I think (Score:1, Interesting)
Does this translate to implied permission in a court of law? Beats me.
Re:Missing the point, I think (Score:3, Interesting)
Open Networks (Score:5, Interesting)
I cannot support any action against people who use your network. It is against my understanding of hacker ethics. When you don't like it then close your network. But no childish games please.
I may even say that I find it unethical to exclude your neighbours from using your network but I respect your opinions. When your network is open it means: Be free to use it. Not: You can use it but I will fuck up or intercept your communication.
Re:Should be legal (Score:3, Interesting)
This is not at all the same thing as being a criminal, because a criminal still acts under the jurisdiction of the law.
In our topsy-turvy legal system we do not have outlaws, merely criminals. You may live counter to the law, but you cannot live outside it. The law is omnipresent.
Smile for the camera.
KFG
Re:Liability? (Score:2, Interesting)
What does ailurophobia have to do with it?
Definition of Ailurophobia
Ailurophobia: An abnormal and persistent fear of cats which produces an undue anxiety reaction even though sufferers realize their fear is irrational. Sufferers of ailurophobia may fear not only the scratch or bite of a cat, but also the "evil mystique" of cats as depicted in Halloween folklore and such literary works as Edgar Allen Poe's "The Black Cat."
From the Greek "ailouros" (cat) and "phobos" (fear). Alternate spellings: "Aelurophobia," "elurophobia." The Greek word "ailourous" has also given us the English word "Ailuroidea," a zoological term for a group of carnivorous animals including cats, hyenas and civets.
An alternate name for fear of cats: "Galeophobia."
Sniff, sniff. (Score:4, Interesting)
Sniffing has nothing to do with subnetting. It has very much to do with the hardware that connects you. If you're both connected to the same hub, you can see all of each other's traffic. If you're both connected to the same switch, you can't.
Note that as a Slashdot comment, this an extremely simplified explanation and not a complete picture.
Re:Goats (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Goats (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Goats (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Goats (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Goats (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Should be legal (Score:2, Interesting)
I see your quote and raise you: "People should not fear their government, their government should fear the people." V for Vendetta.
Re:Goats (Score:4, Interesting)
Here's the proper analogy:
I put my garden hose in the street and leave it running 24/7. Is it stealing if you walk up and fill up a jug with water?
I asked a lawyer this once, and he said yes, but he's a jerk so I take it with a grain of salt.
Besides, the law is whatever the **AA buys.
Re:Goats (Score:3, Interesting)
I've got the same problem with my DS, but I've just setup MAC address filtering and not publicly broadcast the SSID. The DS plays just fine and the average person in my neighborhood isn't smart enough to know that there is a wireless network at all and I'd doubt they'd be smart enough to sniff the packets and modify their wifi to match my list addresses.
Sure half of Slashdot would be able to beat my security in 5 minutes, but when I want to keep my Joe sixpack neighbors from using my network its enough.
Secondly, this minimal amount of security does say "Hey! This wifi network is offlimits! There is no chance of accidental unauthorized use so if you use this without my permission by sniffing MAC address from the packets then it does violate intrusion laws."
So with security with obscurity, I get the local freeloaders off my network and I can play my DS Wifi.
Re:HuH? (Score:1, Interesting)
Bandwidth (Score:3, Interesting)
The bandwidth part is easy to handle, assuming you've got a Linux box between the WAP and the gateway. Amonth the various iptables modules are ones that do rate-limit matching and per-IP queueing. You could easily give each poacher access to the internet without restricting the available ports but at a rate that resembles a 4800 baud modem. That way they would have enough bandwidth to download email and surf essential web sites but not enough to get you into trouble with warez traders.
Re:Can you imagine the tech support calls? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Goats (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Goats (Score:1, Interesting)
I live about a 10min walk from the ocean. My gulls might be different to your gulls, but I'll take gulls any day over those flying rats of the sky. Seagulls are noisy and annoying when I'm at the beach (not far from famous Bondi Beach in Sydney Australia), but at night time they at least fuck off and sleep near the cliffs or on the sand.
The flying rats of the sky on the other hand, decide that at 4am they want to snuggle up to each other at my bedroom window and coo-coo-coo all bloody night.
If I...
a) Lived in the country and
b) had a 12 gauge pump
I'd be using a lot of bird-shot and feeding them to my cat.
Hate them. They are an introduced species, they shit everywhere, roost above ceilings bringing added fire danger and lice/mites, aggressively chase away native species (I see this happen every day) and they're noisy in the wrong locations at the worst times. In Sydney, pidgeons, Indian Mynahs (murderous little bastards) and sparrows should be eliminated if at all possible.
Especially the Indian Mynah, they are an extreme threat to our native birds. For some reason, in Sydney the common sparrow has seemed (to me at least) to have diminished in numbers dramatically. I can't remember the last time I saw a sparrow, when 25 years ago they could be seen and heard every day. Maybe the Indian Mynah killed them off.