SUSE Linux Enterprise 10, a Closer Look 273
Tripperfish writes "Mad Penguin's Adam Doxtater has published an in-depth review of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10, Novell's alleged 'Vista Killer.' From the article: 'SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 is a very capable, industrial strength desktop which is ready to take on basic desktop chores in the corporate environment, and for the price you simply cannot go wrong. ' The review comes complete with screenshots and Flash movies of the install, new GNOME interface, and Beagle in action."
Killer Mania! (Score:5, Insightful)
You certainly wouldn't hear Novell utter those words. I believe that a company that's been around as long as they have has more sense than that and knows that the best they could ever hope for is "Vista competitor." It would be interesting to know just how much of a margin Novell would have to take of Microsoft's sales in order for them to consider the maneuver to be a success.
On a side note, this "killer" stuff is getting way out of hand, with iPod killers [slashdot.org] and Flash killers [slashdot.org], and
Please folks; enough with the killing.
Can't we all just get along?
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:2)
Another example (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:5, Insightful)
I was under the impression that "FUD" stood for "Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt," and generally refers to a marketing strategy of spreading vague rumors and reports of defects in competing products.
By contrast, calling this product a "Vista killer" seems to say more about how great SuSE's product will be, supposing it could, in fact, win significant marketshare away from Windows. Now, calling something an "X killer" is certainly a stupid remark, but it clearly doesn't fit the traditional definition of FUD as some kind of vague, unsubstantiated, rumors about flaws in a competing product.
When did FUD switch from the classical definition to "any random stupid statement that Joe Slashdotter disagrees with"?
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:3, Insightful)
Since it became a meme and almost everyone forgot what it stands for.
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:3, Funny)
Of course, people who don't know where the accents go, might pronounce it "Fud-per-bowl", which might make it sound as if it's the U.S. championship of FUD.... little CGI bottles of FUD squaring off during the commercials...
Okay, this is going way off course. It's pronounced FUD-per-bowl-ee. New cool haxor
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:2, Funny)
The moment the word came into existence (Score:2)
Language is a tool for war and in war you always take the biggest guns avaialble to you. FUD instead of hype, hype instead of exegerated claims, exegerated claims instead of marketting speak.
It is a very old tradition.
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:3, Insightful)
Since it's the shortest word to type as a slashdot tag for these kind of articles. Been noticing its inappropriate use already for some time now in the tags. Am a big fan of the tagging system what the rest concerns.
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:2)
RTFA Re:Killer Mania! (Score:3, Informative)
Take a look at this article. Yes it's crap - but this article DOES say that desktop 10 is taking on VISTA and aims to beat it.
Re:RTFA Re:Killer Mania! (Score:2)
Better to aim high and miss. Because I know if I was spending millions on a product, I'd be targetting it as a thoroughly mediocre alternative ...
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:2)
not to mention the cheezy 3-d desktop that lets you scroll 'side to side' to see stacked windows easier, all while doubling the power drain on a laptop.
when you've got a fat bloated pig like vista, even suse 10 could easily be a vista killer.
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:2, Interesting)
Why not? That 'trusted computing' in vista is like a cursed boots of slowness -35
Except that Vista doesn't include Trusted Computing. It has some DRM features, but not a heck of a lot more that you can get with Windows XP and the latest MS Media software. Oh, and if you don't use any DRM files, absolutely nothing DRM related runs.
not to mention the cheezy 3-d desktop that lets you scroll 'side to side' to see stacked windows easier,
Oh, yes, MS is certainly the first OS manufacturer to realize that
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Killer Mania! (Score:2)
Push-technologists from Ximian wanted to standardise SuSE on Gnome. Market never requested it. I like Gnome, I use it sometimes. But selling a SuSE with Gnome as default is like a holy shrine in a whorehouse. I don't like a Gnome SuSe.
SuSE always had a reputation of a solid and easy distribution and followed a true and fair view. Suppor
Looks nice (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Looks nice (Score:2)
Re:Looks nice (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Looks nice (Score:2)
Re:Looks nice (Score:4, Insightful)
Windows is opt-out, not opt-in; I think that, most of the time, people would prefer not to use Windows and the attendant expensive software bundle. Linux is an alternative, especially with systems like Ubuntu that take the pain out of administration.
Basically, Windows isn't reaching new people; Linux is. Even if the market share for Linux in established markets grows very slowly, it has to beat Microsoft eventually. Not necessarily in my lifetime, but eventually.
Re:Looks nice (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Looks nice (Score:3, Interesting)
What I hear... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Looks nice (Score:5, Interesting)
I've just downloaded and installed it on a Centrino laptop, and I think any enterprise which does not consider it will be missing a major opportunity.
It is a lot simpler to configure and use than XP, and the default install includes an intelligent selection of the best of open source and proprietary Linux software, from project planners to video editors. The install was as easy and quick as Doxtater suggests, and connection to our network was simple and seamless with both the wireless and wired LANs. I've only used the install for a couple of hours, but if anything, the reviewer has understated the usefulness of Beagle. When I selected text in Firefox to copy and paste here, the pop-up menu has a "Beagle" option which offers to find references to the text or the link
In fact, the version I've downloaded (RC3) looks like it's a bit more recent than the version reviewed. On the desktop is a link to a "Quick Start Tour", which is a training package in html/flash that takes you through step-by-step instructions for all of the major components of the OS and applications. There's more than sixty courses there.
The feel is much more polished than any other Linux distro I've used, and the interface is clear and consistent in use. OSX is prettier, but SLED 10 has a clean businesslike style which works well and is not intrusive. It definitely makes XP look old and clunky.
Make no mistake, this is a landmark distro. For the first time, I'd feel confident about sitting an average computer user in front of a Linux distro and telling them to get started. The clean interface and built-in training mean that most would have less difficulty making the transition to SLED than they would from Win 2000 to XP.
It would work in a lot of places (Score:2)
With the existing installed base of windows & apps in the companies I consult for, it will take alot more than this to replace the windows based systems.
Of course, if you were urging your customers to move their critical systems to web-based apps three years ago and had rolled those systems out last year, then your customers would be almost ready to cut the cord. And it doesn't have to be all or nothing. I have one customer...70 employeess, graphic arts oriented business...that could move their ent
Star Trek (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Star Trek (Score:2)
Yes, they did. [freshmeat.net]
Horrible article (Score:3, Insightful)
Say what? Microsoft isn't supporting NT 4 now. Are companies migrating en masse to Fedora 5 or whatever version it was in 2000? And I am sure that Novell is just chomping at the bit, waiting for 2011, when MS stops supporting XP.
Re:Horrible article (Score:4, Insightful)
Also NT 4 has been widely replaced with Linux; when NT 4 was in it's prime Linux and *BSD weren't viable choices.
Re:Horrible article (Score:2)
It would be nice if they e
SLES/SLED (Score:5, Interesting)
I have a SLES Admin job, and if we weren't sticking with 9 for support reasons (Dell is staying with 9 for the forseeable future 1Y+) I'd be excited to support 10.
KDE is gone - practically erased from the experience. There is a QT4 interface control panel, and a few mentions of Kthis and Kthat, but you hardly ever see it. YaST (GUI) is GTK2/Mono, the Zen software manager is Mono, the Desktop is Gnome.
The usability is almost there.. I give it until version 11, and if HP and Dell get behind it like they say they are, you can validate the 'Vista-killer' remark, no matter how stupid it is.. There will finally be two real alternatives for Intel desk/laptops: Leopard and SLED.
Re:SLES/SLED (Score:3, Informative)
It's a big improvement over SLES 9, though. At least YaST doesn't have terminal problems and lockup problems any more.
Re:SLES/SLED (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:SLES/SLED (Score:2)
I think both desktops work and Beagle seems cool, but you know,
Re:SLES/SLED (Score:2)
While they may be alternatives, what really matters is what programs run on the desktop.
For business, Office's lock will be hard to overcome unless OpenOffice or something else is made to work seamlessly with Office; then there are speci
Re:SLES/SLED (Score:2)
Re:SLES/SLED (Score:3, Informative)
10.1 still ships with KDE as the Desktop.
SuSE recently shifted from KDE to GNOME since the acuisition of Ximian.
Miguel De Icaza has assumed a more influential role in Novell's Linux effort, hence the Mono presence in so many tools in SLES/D.
Re:SLES/SLED (Score:3, Insightful)
OpenSuSE, or the Enterprise one that the article is about? The new Enterprise one uses a more GNOME-centric system in general, it seems. I've no doubt that KDE is still an option, though.
Re:SLES/SLED (Score:2)
I do try gnome each time major version comes out, but so far KDE seems to have more features that I care about - in particular fish: (ability to browse remote folders via ssh), konqueror and general integration between applications.
What do you find you like better in Gnome vs KDE ?
Re:SLES/SLED (Score:2)
I personally just encourage people to switch to KDE.
This "users are idiots, and are confused by functionality" mentality of
Gnome is a disease. If you think your users are idiots, only idiots will
use it. I don't use Gnome, because in striving to be simple, it has long
since reached the point where it simply doesn't do what I need it to do.
Please, just tell people to use KDE.
Linus
Can We Just Grow Up Yet? (Score:5, Interesting)
OK. I read the article. The replacement for the start menu is interesting (even if it is, in many ways, like the start menu in XP). I'm glad to see they like Beagle (which I haven't read much about). The fact that single sign-on works with Active Directory is also interesting. But that's not what I take away from the article.
It was written by someone who has no hopes of ever being a journalist and should stop writing to try to convince people.
After reading that article I don't want to try the new SUSE version. I probably wouldn't have if it was written well. But instead, I get an article that is mostly good with a few VERY odd bits thrown in. Like I was reading along about something on the second page or so and came across something along the lines of "... and Mac users (dirty rotten hippies all of 'em". Do you have ANY IDEA how much that makes me respect the author?
That's stupid enough, but he then goes on later to talk about Spotlight and how everyone should try it and how great it is. Last I checked, there was only one way to use Spotlight: on a Mac.
There are other little bits too. Like on the last page when he says that you don't have to worry next year when "Windows ME 2.0 is released" because Linux already has all the features. First, it doesn't. Biggest omission: DirectX 10. Now I know that's not the fault of anyone involved in Linux, but the statement is wrong. More importantly, it is a cheap shot.
If the article was all fan-boy ravings, that would be one thing. If the article was all high-quality overview, that would be another. But the author can't seem to decide which of those he is. In fact, the author couldn't even decided to take a middle ground.
This kind of stuff only hurts the community. I see next to no honest reviews of Linux. I tons of "Windows is dead!" reviews that just don't take everyday use into account for the average user. Here's a great OS. It's perfect for your little sister. But only one of her 12 games will run, that will take work. And you can't buy games for it so you are basically giving up playing commercial games on your computer. Yes, you can dual boot Windows and play games that way. What's that you say? So why bother with Linux?
This kind of stuff is just juvenile. You can point out SUSE has features of Vista now without calling it "Windows ME 2.0". You can point out people use Macs without calling them all dirty hippies.
And you can guarantee I'll never read an article off that site again.
Re:Can We Just Grow Up Yet? (Score:5, Informative)
Different strokes for differnent folks. I enjoy Mad Penguin's crazy style, and so do others. That's why we read him.
Re:Can We Just Grow Up Yet? (Score:2)
Had you read a little bit about it, you would know that it was written by Nat Friedman and the Ximian team, which is now a part of Novell. So it makes some sense that they would "like" Beagle.
Re:Can We Just Grow Up Yet? (Score:2)
"There are other little bits too. Like on the last page when he
says that you don't have to worry next year when "Windows ME 2.0
is released" because Linux already has all the features. First,
it doesn't. Biggest omission: DirectX 10."
What?! Did you expect that DirectX in any version would EVER be
included in ANY OS other than Windows?? Give me a break! That would
be like trying to take a AMD CPU and somehow jamming it into a
Pentium 4 only mother board. It ain't going to happen pal.
'This kind of st
Re:Can We Just Grow Up Yet? (Score:2)
I'm not anymore, and this kind of stuff is why. I've been losing interest in Linux. I played with it much more a few years ago. It taught me my love of Unix, but I've found OS X which I consider the best of both worlds.
That said, I still follow it, especially the kernel. I subscribe to LWN. I've learned TONS about operating system design and theory by following the developments in the Linux kernel for the past few years.
Also, it's possible to be part of the Linux community without being a zealot.
And I wa
Not to Suse at least... (Score:2)
On the other hand, you have the Munich experience which are going to a homegrown red hat based solution, and there is also the big Ubuntu bubble building up.
I don't see Suse easting up any kind of market no matter how much they improve it.
Novell's strategy (Score:5, Insightful)
But if they want to be successful at all, they'll need to nail these two things:
1) Marketing
2) Alleviating fears about training and support.
And Novell has been known to suck at (1) -- and it's going to be all uphill for (2). But good luck to them, because we need more variety in computing to keep MS on their toes and valuing their developers more so that they actually have to compete on merits for a change.
Re:Novell's strategy (Score:2)
The company I work for actually just recently moved to 1.4.
Re:Novell's strategy (Score:2)
I was thinking more along the lines of company info help desk.
Gnome Desktop? (Score:5, Interesting)
I was always waiting for the other shoe to drop when Novell bought out Ximian, is this that shoe?
Re:Gnome Desktop? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Gnome Desktop? (Score:2, Insightful)
More != better. For example, look at Konqueror. The default setup has 17 buttons sitting on the toolbar. Then there are the menu names. We have "Location" and "go". Then there's "tools" and "settings". I guess the guiding philosophy here is "if you haven't solved the problem, just add more".
Re:Gnome Desktop? (Score:2, Troll)
Yes, and Miguel is kind of an idiot in a lot of ways. Under his direction it took an unbelievable number of years to achieve even basic stability so the the panel wouldn't keep crashing. Let alone usability while always seems to get ignored in favor of the latest cool and more bloated tech bandwagon to jump on. I mean, corba, give me a break, it got eaten
Re:Gnome Desktop? (Score:2)
I would almost agree. Stick-to-it-ive-ness and self promotion go a long way in this OpenSource world. Especially when we're *just now* gaining traction with "Old World"/"Post Dot-Com" corporate minds.
It's not all bad.
It can be a good thing if you can work with it. Miguel apparently is. He has the ear of a good many execs at Novell, and the Mono inititive there will do much to initiate some quaking in Microsoft's boots.
Apple and their Safari develop
Re:Gnome Desktop? (Score:2, Interesting)
It will not make Microsoft even blink, let alone quake, because:
1) mono is currently a partial
Wireless? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Wireless? (Score:2)
Re:Wireless? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Wireless? (Score:2)
Re:Wireless? (Score:2)
(Posting over a broadcom g card using wpa-psk ndiswrapper + wpa_supplicant)
Re:Wireless? (Score:3, Informative)
Except, you know, OS X (airport extreme is broadcom) and the 2.6.17 kernel.
Re:Wireless? (Score:2, Interesting)
Running it Now (Score:5, Interesting)
Some important points missed in the article (Score:5, Interesting)
1. Package management is very important. Can the package manager automatically handle conflicts and upgrade as many packages as possible without screwing up? Will I have to use some weird command line incantation like "yum --resolve-pkgs xyz-1.0 -f -v -qr ~/.yumrc" when things go wrong or something equally horrible?
2. Is it forward compatible? That is, does SUSE have an equivalent to "apt-get dist-upgrade"?
3. Where are the DROP SHADOWS?!? The screenshots show the Compiz WM presumably running on Xgl, so there should be drop shadows in there.
4. Since the WM used is Compiz it means you have lots of cute effects, like wobbly windows, transparency and shadows. It also means you don't have all the useful features that a mature WM like Metacity has; like proper workspaces (the desktop cube isn't fully developed yet last I looked at it), accessability options, lots of different themes to choose from, configurable keybindings etc.
5. Why Gnome 2.12? Gnome 2.12 wasn't a very good release for me, speed wise it was a noticable regression from 2.10. Thankfully most of those regressions have been fixed in 2.14 so I'm very surprised to hear about this SUSE shipping with 2.12. One would hope that the upgrade path to 2.14 would be smooth and painless, see point 2.
In short, SUSE 10 has some very exciting new features, Windows-like start menu, Beage integration, very good looking icon set and Xgl. But I doubt it is a Vista killer or even an Ubuntu killer because of the aforementioned points. I'll stick with Ubuntu, but I really hope that the Ubuntu devs will copy all the cool features from SUSE 10.
Answers to your points (Score:3, Informative)
Take all of these replies with a grain of salt. I haven't filed problems in Novell's bugzilla [novell.com] and anyone complaining about things but not filing bugs probably isn't interested in helping to make things better.
1. Package management. This is a curious one as Yast's dep solving seems to now be done by the No
Gnome 2.14 and xorg 7.x?? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Gnome 2.14 and xorg 7.x?? (Score:2)
Re:Gnome 2.14 and xorg 7.x?? (Score:2)
wrong one. (Score:3, Interesting)
Nobody will upgrade via actual choice, just having it on their new computers, as forced by their hardware vendor. And that doesn't actually get MS any more money for developing Vista over XP (unless they raise prices).
Vista killer? (Score:5, Interesting)
Wake me up when this happens, I'll buy everyone a drink.
Not a single network (Score:2)
Education and Government are two such networks that are starting to break away, or at least diversify. Either way it will reduce the effect for other secto
Re:Vista killer? (Score:2)
I think you misunderstand my post entirely. Allow me to clarify:
Re:Vista killer? (Score:2)
My mom uses Linux (Score:3, Informative)
Me moms been using Linux since 1998. And I mean using it, not dicking around with like you. First SuSE, now Gentoo soon to be Ubuntu. She clicks the icon in her taskbar to dialup her ISP. She prefers it to Windows because:
1. It's stable
2. It's easy to use
3. It has all the applications she wants (e-mail, word processor, web browser)
4. Multiple desktops
5. I
Re:Vista killer? (Score:3, Insightful)
Moreover, Linux is rather impractical for those with dialup Internet service or (gasp) no Internet connection at all. Last I checked, that's still
Please, cut the "killer" nonsense (Score:4, Interesting)
SLED still has a long way to go... (Score:4, Interesting)
My primary boxes run SuSE 10 OSS and SLED and at least 5 production boxes have been switched to SLES.
Fact is, SLED while certainly an improvement on what has come before it still isn't smooth enough for us. The Novell client is flaky, the various SuSE network config scrips don't play well with secondary DNS suffixes and simple things like the various pack-in apps don't work properly out of the box. Also, while not a SuSE issue specifically, WordPerfect support in OpenOffice is horrible. You might think "So what?" but the schools systems and government offices that run Novell are quite often running the WordPerfect Suite as well.
(Up until this year the WPO cost in volume licensing was insignifigant relative to that of MSO. WP is enjoying a false sense of security right now since MSO 07 was delayed.)
Now, if SLED isn't good enough to convince existing customers who are already fairly pro-Novell and pro-Linux what hope is there is convert the rest of the world?
The feature set is fine as it is. Novell/SuSE need stop adding new crap and increasing the major version number. Instead they should be polishing what they have and refining those everyday apps that the "users" actually care about.
Re:SLED still has a long way to go... (Score:3, Informative)
Umm... the reviewer missed XGL? (Score:3, Informative)
The reviewer totally spaced off the coolest part of SLED, seamless support for XGL. SLED has an XGL configurator built into the control panel. It even makes installing vga drivers easy on Linux for once, no mucking with the xorg.conf to get dual monitors or XGL working.
Seriously, if you like eye candy, Linux has never had it better. This will even impress the guys using a Mac. Remember how cool it was to play with the Dock the first time? This is like that only better.
If you could care less for eye candy but like the productivity boost of Apple's Expose, then you need to look into SLED. If you like accessability, XGL does zoom better than any other desktop, even Windows. No other distro has XGL like SLED does since Novell sponsored its development. http://www.novell.com/linux/xglrelease/ [novell.com] Its hard for me to believe that this guy missed that in his review.
I don't think that SLED 10 is a Vista killer, but it does make Desktop linux look good even to Windows fanboys. Seriously, give XGL on SLED a look.
Re:Umm... the reviewer missed XGL? (Score:2, Informative)
Fair enough. His review of XGL on 10.1 was pretty good, although it is in the article that you linked that he uses the phrase "Vista Killer", which may be where all the top thread confusion is from.
The thing that I really like about XGL, and he commented on this more than once, is that it is more than eye candy, it is actually a productivity enhancer. The other great thing about it is how it is all handled by your gpu instead of the cpu, so if you have a nice vga card then it does not degrade your cpu per
I didn't see anything about "Vista killer" but... (Score:2)
I guess no OS is perfect. I did install Suse 10.1 on my old HP Pavilion laptop and it went perfectly. The author is correct. The OS is VERY impressive. And if anyone has a suggestion about how to get it to work on my desk top I would love to hear i
Real Vista Killer! (Score:2, Interesting)
FYI (Score:3, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Well... (Score:2)
Re:Well... (Score:2)
Re:Well... (Score:2)
he wants raw procesing, which you pretty much must have your manufacturers raw software to do right
Re:Well... (Score:5, Insightful)
Confused much? (Score:5, Funny)
I'm not sure how you think making a web browser look like an email client will do anyone any good.
I won't even go into what I personally think of the Outlook Express interface, as that is just opinion.
You know now that I think of it you are on to something here, OSS needs this kind of thinking to really take off. We need Open Office to be designed to look just like Nero. And if only Evolution looked just like Windows Movie Maker. That will make adoption so much easier!
[/tongue in cheek mode]
Re:Well... (Score:2)
Re:What's the difference between the regular one? (Score:4, Interesting)
As for Ubuntu, I use it. But I would recommend you try both Ubuntu and Suse (the free version, for starters), since they're free. See which is better for you.
Re:and for the price you simply cannot go wrong (Score:4, Informative)
It is at the moment. If you have a look on their website, Novell are offering a free download for evaluation. Unlike some other evaluation versions of operating systems, it doesn't expire.
Re:Java 1.4.2?? (Score:2)
Bob