Liquid Cooling More than One Component? 65
static0verdrive asks: "I am new to liquid-cooling, and I have designed a system for use in a micro-ATX OpenBSD server, with the following layout: Fillport > Reservoir/Pump > Y Split (one to CPU and the other to chip-set) > Y Reconnect > Radiator/Fan > Back to the fillport. I don't like the idea of having the hot coolant coming from the CPU going directly to the chip-set, hence the Y split. Could this split cause any problems? Would there be a difference in pressure (considering the CPU is most likely a lot hotter) that could cause an issue? How would you handle liquid-cooling more than one component? What if I wanted to cool 3 components, such as in the case where I add a video card to this setup later on?"
UPenn prof (Score:5, Informative)
Re:UPenn prof (Score:2, Troll)
There are 2 problems with naming a link "here": those who use a link summary program won't know what the link is about unless they read the post - which completely defeats point of using the link summary program. Obviously, they get frustarated as hell.
Second problem is that search engines (yes i mean google
Maybe link to the actual page? (Score:1)
suspect idea (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:suspect idea (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:suspect idea (Score:1, Troll)
Re:suspect idea (Score:2)
Well, with no budget considerations... :) (used to work in a research lab doing some very fancy aerodynamics research)
Digitally acutated valves are easy to find, as are digital flow meters (Google for a decent industrial supply place - McMaster-Carr [mcmastercarr.com] is a good one). Find an I/O card (PCI I/O boards are cheap), then write some code to control the valves based on flow meter feedback and tie into your chip's temperature readouts and regulate temperature that way. Be sure to allow for calibration procedures
Re:suspect idea (Score:2)
Extra credit if the valves are directly thermally controlled. No computers.
If a central heating can do it why is that so difficult for a computer cooling system.
Hint: the valves for floor central heating use valves which work based on the return fluid temperature. It should not be that hard to make something similar for Nx coolant distribution.
Re:suspect idea (Score:1)
Re:suspect idea (Score:5, Funny)
Re:suspect idea (Score:3, Funny)
Re:suspect idea (Score:2)
$RANDOMLUUUUSSEERRR!!!!
Re:suspect idea (Score:2)
You'd need, of course 8 relays done something like this:
d0 --->
d1 --->
d2 --->
Assuming your pumps vary in speed from 3v to 6v. An identical setup for d3 d4 and d5.
d6 and d7 would simply be a master on/off for
Good idea, a few comments, tho... (Score:2)
Re:Good idea, a few comments, tho... (Score:2)
I think most of these come with sample asm code to show you how to manipulate the registers, could be the very utility you were talking about.
I looked into it once so I could have 3 led's, red, green and yellow
Electricity Analogy (Score:2)
The reason I bring this up is that it gives you a nice way to easily calculate the fl
Re:suspect idea (Score:1)
Independent pumps (Score:2)
As a Slashdot user
Just my $0.02.
Re:Buy a Mac (Score:2)
Re:Buy a Mac (Score:1)
You can actually, what if you need HA clustering of applications?? Where's OpenBSD on that? We work in an area where our UNIX applications are clustered on 2 different HA clusters in 2 different countries, with replicated SAN volumes for each datacenter, and failure of one or more, or even the whole datacenter, is fixed by one or more cluster groups either failing over within the same datacenter or to the other datacenter a few thousand kms away, eith
Re:Buy a Mac (Score:2)
As I said in another reply, this will be in my room with little airflow, always on, and I want it silent. It will serve SSH/SFTP, Doom 3, Quake 3 & 4, Unreal Tournament 2004, Armagetron Advanced, and a few othe
Re:Buy a Mac (Score:2)
I think this comment is especially funny, since owners of liquid-cooled G5 macs are starting to experience an issue with pools of coolant forming under their system.
Re:Buy a Mac (Score:2)
Re:Buy a Mac (Score:1, Troll)
Remember Fluid dynamics (Score:4, Informative)
And why watercool? use the oil+fish tank (Score:1)
http://www.markusleonhardt.de/en/oelrechner.html [markusleonhardt.de]
The idea is to submerge the entire computer in vegetable (or better, mineral) oil. This cools ALL components at a lot less cost than a bunch of watercool components, and at less effort as well.
Re:And why watercool? use the oil+fish tank (Score:2)
I'm curious as well whether the heat transfer from a chip submerged in fluid like that is better or worse than one that has a cooling block with some sort of coolant forced through it. The dissipation of heat throughout a static volume of fluid might end up being worse than you can achieve by f
Loop Planning (Score:3, Informative)
The bottom line on your waterloop, in my own experience, you'll find that the order in which the water is flowing results in negligible water temperature increase/decrease.
I have two machines WC'ed, a P4 (pre-prescott) and a Dual Xeon. The order of the loop for the P4, pump/res> radiator > CPU Waterblock > GPU Waterblock > Flow Indicator > Pump.
The P4 only gets to about 90F during heavy gaming sessions (ATI X800XL). Then again, I have a triple 80MM fan radiator. Your results may and will vary.
Re:Loop Planning (Score:2, Informative)
water sops up heat well enough to not worry about the heat input from your CPU, other chips do not need to be kept as cool. however, this is something to think about when buying/making your waterblocks. if you use a j
Re:Loop Planning (Score:2)
I agree that the radiators in parallel is better for heat transfer, but your explaination is nonsense. Heat transfer improves with the flow rate of the system. Slower moving fluid transfers heat less efficiently than fast moving fluid. Attatching the radiators in parallel reduces the total flow resistance in the system and increases flow through each radiator.
adding to the question (Score:1)
I previously cooled my cpu and graphics card (both 25% overclocked) but because of an initial lack of funding went back to air cooled and
modest (10%) overclock.
Anyone tackled with with a single pump/radiator solution?
thanks!
my setup (Score:2, Interesting)
out to cpu, split one into geforce 6800 ultra OC, meet up with the split 1/4 " pipes to go back into the reservoir. works beautifully... in a non-airconditioned room in muggy SE Pennsylvania playing the Prey demo... only got to 42 Celcius. Add AC and it maxes out at 39 Celcius.
It's a Koolance rig.
My take (Score:2, Informative)
Y-Split generally not advised (Score:5, Informative)
Splitting the main(Y-split) to cool several devices is generally not recommend over cooling multiple components in serial.
Most people go: Pump->CPU->radiator->reservoir
some people go: Pump->CPU->Video GPU->radiator->reservoir
and very few people go: Pump->CPU->Video GPU->Chipset->radiator->reservoir
( or even Pump->CPU->Video GPU #1>-Video GPU #2->Chipset->Memory->radiator->reservoir)
As you add more and more stuff to the circuit, you'll also need a bigger pump, a bigger radiator, and you'll have to seal the connection points more carefully to gaurd against leaks resulting from higher pressure. It's the general consensus that splitting the coolant in a parallel fashion like you're describing is less effective than connecting the components in serial. The primary reason is that flowrate X volume is king in water cooling...with a Y-split you're cutting your CPU water cooling volume in half, and probably restricting flow even further with narrower tubing. Also, pressure drop in the system is a function of how much tubing you use. More tube, less pressure. People have tried this before...and their results weren't comparable with serial.
I'm assuming you want to water cool so you can overclock. If this is so, then you need to prioritize your CPU over everything else. If you don't plan on overclocking and just want the silence, then you're still better off using serial because it's cheaper and safer(less connection points means a lower leak probability).
Don't worry about warm water returning from the CPU and 'heating' the chipset. Fast flowrate and the high heat capacity of water keep this from being a problem. Generally the water temperature across the entire circuit is nearly homogenous(maybe 1-2 degrees difference).
To learn more:
1) Goto http://www.ocforums.com/forumdisplay.php?s=099a5c
2) Spend at least 2 hours reading the stickies etc. (or register and ask your own question, the folks there are very knowledgeable.)
Good luck with it!
Re:Y-Split generally not advised (Score:2)
Might be fan noise. (Score:2)
Rather than overclocking, they want to take a regular desktop processor running at its normal speed and move the heat out of the case and into a large radiator, where it can cool just into the ambient room air, without fans.
I don't know how well this works, or how much noise the pumps make, but I've definitely heard people talking about using liquid systems as an alternative to forced air on basically typical (non-hotrodded) desktop systems.
Re:WTF?!? Who cares! (Score:1, Flamebait)
Tube size (Score:4, Interesting)
why go to liquid cooling? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:why go to liquid cooling? (Score:1)
stop worrying (Score:2, Informative)
1. Relax, be lazy and have a beer. You're dealing with (I think) a server in your home that is probably going to remain lightly
Independent pumps (Score:2)
As a Slashdot user (who knows nothing about liquid cooling), it seems to me like the way to ensure each component gets adequate cooling is to have a big, shared radiator and a smaller, separate pump for each component. That way they are each ensured their own coolant flow. The downside, of course, is that you need three pumps, which will cost more and make more noise.
Just my $0.02.
Do not Y for two reasons. (Score:3, Interesting)
Your lower water flow in each cold-plate due to splitting the flow with a Y lowers the velocity thru each cold-plate and thus lowers the heat transfer between the water and the cold-plate.
Reason 2:
You do not have the equipment needed to measure the flow thru the 2 branches of the Y so you risk having 1 component be hotter than needed and not know it. Some will suggest using valves to choke flow to the higher-flowing cold-plate, but this way you are wasting pump head.
Sadly, water cooling has come from being done right (like by IBM and the water cooled version of the VAX 9000, which was changed to air cooling before being shipped) to the use of feeble pumps and undersized radiators. In many cases, water cooling in PCs has become the equivalent of a "Type R" sticker on a Honda sedan.
There is nothing magical about water cooling. An air cooled setup can have the same performance, given good heat sink surface area, good fin efficiency of the heatsink, and 600 feet/minute airflow. A water cooling setup CAN let you to increase the effective heatsink area for ejecting heat into the room air without a fin efficiency penalty. But to do this you need enough flow and enough radiator area, and to keep costs down most kits are marginal on both.
It doesnt matter... (Score:3)
Parallel vs. Series (Score:3, Informative)
If you don't have a method to correctly balance the flow then your best bet is a hybrid series-parallel configuration. The best solution will depend on the heat load of every component you want to cool and the physical characteristics of the pump and radiator.
serial connections. (Score:3, Informative)
My current loop is as follows:
Athlon MP2800+ -> Athlon MP2800+ -> AMD 762 Northbridge -> FireGL X1-128 -> Koolance 2 DIMM RAM cooler-> Reserator.
Once the temperatures reach steady state, the difference in temperature between any two points in the loop is less than 2 degrees C. In doesn't really matter how much water is circulating or how fast (these do matter though, in determining how fast the steady state can change when a cooled component suddenly changes its temperature). What really matters is the surface area of your radiator, and the airflow over it's fins.
Under full load, on a 30C day, the Reserator is very warm to the touch. I can drop the temperature to below room temperature by putting a fan behind it. Whatever temperature the radiator is at is the temperature the blocks are at (at steady state conditions).
If you want to cool more components, you don't have to fill up your case with parallel cooling loops. Instead, add them in series and add another radiator is series also. You only ever need one input hose and one output hose piercing the case. The Reserators work really well for this, since you only need a pump in one of them. The other(s) are just extra surface area.
Re:serial connections. (Score:2)
Yours truly,
The Laws of Thermodynamics
PS the Reserator is total rice, thus proving that you are a fag. You probably run Ubuntu on your "rig".
Re:serial connections. (Score:2)
I had only put my hand on it to feel the temperature when I made the previous statement. I should have used the sensor, so yeah, my measurement technique was shit.
As for the Reserator, it works just fine. I like it because it has no fans, and is therefore quiet. I also like that it doesn't look like an automobile part. It has surface area to radiate enough heat to
My solution (Score:2)
Re:My solution (Score:2)
Jackhole.
Fluorinert (Score:1)
Of course, the liquid is about $270 a liter.