Browser Tools Aim to Warn Surfers of Spyware, Spam 95
Carl Bialik from WSJ writes "New Web tools aim to protect surfers by flagging sites that are associated with viruses, spam or other scourges, but they sometimes disagree over whether a site is safe. From the article: 'Scandoo's service sometimes misses the mark in its efforts to flag adult content. On a recent day, it gave a green rating to the web site for Maxim Magazine's U.K. division, even though it contains nudity. It gave a red rating to the magazine's U.S. site, which contains no nudity. After an inquiry from the Online Journal, [executive Dan] Nadir said Scandoo decided to change the rating, reclassifying the U.K. site as red by default. "It was clear that it was misclassified, so we classified it correctly," Mr. Nadir said. A spokesman for Maxim Online said the discrepancy showed Scandoo's technology is "clearly broken."'"
I use this great tool for this (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I use this great tool for this (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I use this great tool for this (Score:1)
You mean this stuff won't make my hair grow back?
Re:Where's the Firefox Extension for this? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Where's the Firefox Extension for this? (Score:2)
Re:Where's the Firefox Extension for this? (Score:5, Informative)
Broken? (Score:5, Insightful)
No, it may have something to do with what is acceptable regarding nudity in Europe vs the US. Bare breasts is not apparently a big deal with our friends across the pond, but over here, it's cause to bring out the torches and pitchforks. Besides, last I saw Maxim (the US version) it contained no real nudity at all.
Re:Broken? (Score:2)
Re:Broken? (Score:1, Informative)
locale-flagging (Score:2)
Re:Broken? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Broken? (Score:1)
US vs. EU (Score:2)
Run for you life !!!!
(the only thing that change is the direction in which the people are running).
Google Safe Browsing (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Google Safe Browsing (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Google Safe Browsing (Score:1)
Trouble is, I DON'T WANT ANY MORE TOOLBARS! Ahem. More is NOT better in this case.
Perhaps that is the reason why I rarely got hit by adware/spyware, even before Firefox. I just have never seen a real reason for all these toolbars. *shrug*
H.
Re:Google Safe Browsing (Score:2)
SCAMdoo (Score:2)
SiteAdvisor? (Score:1)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Google Safe Browsing (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Google Safe Browsing (Score:2)
The wonderful thing about the Internet is you instantaneously arrive wherever you want to go. At which point is the user supposed to make a personal judgement about a site? While the request packet arrives at the server but before the data is returned?
I'm not saying I want my internet filtered, but if I did, I think the point of t
Re:Google Safe Browsing (Score:1)
Re:Google Safe Browsing (Score:1)
Re:Google Safe Browsing (Score:2)
McAffee Site Advisor (Score:5, Informative)
ViewFour.com (Score:1)
Re:ViewFour.com (Score:1)
Oops, not so safe after all!
Re:ViewFour.com (Score:1)
Re:ViewFour.com LOL (Score:1)
Re:Maxim? (Score:5, Informative)
browser tool popups (Score:1)
Re:browser tool popups (Score:2)
It may have been less entertaining had I not been running Mac OS X.
Re:browser tool popups (Score:1)
Re:browser tool popups (Score:1)
I am confused (Score:2)
Re:I am confused (Score:2)
Re:I am confused (Score:3, Funny)
It might just turn your computers floppy drive, into a stiffy...
H.
Re:I am confused (Score:2)
Re:I am confused (Score:1)
Oh, not this again (Score:3, Funny)
* Warning! This site contains porn and spyware! * (Score:4, Funny)
Missing option: breasts! :) (Score:2)
Re:Missing option: breasts! :) (Score:2)
H.
the soviets... (Score:2, Funny)
Good gesture but IMO useless (Score:3, Insightful)
Not that it makes a big difference but the moment some people finally realize that when they're being sloppy with their computer it allows 3rd parties to compromise it resulting in abuse towards others. Even this isn't always enough ("so? as long as nothing happens to me, I got nothing to hide") so
Only after you've realized this will you have a good basis to take it to the next step, which is IMO actually setting up legal grounds for retaliation. But quite frankly I don't see this happening sometime soon. First due to the overhead, second the amount of money which is being made here on all levels (even the "good guys" trying to protect us really aren't moral knights or something) and finally.. Most people will remain stupid.
First time... (Score:3, Funny)
Bowser Aims to Warn Surfers of Spyware, Spam
sinse when does the king koopa care about me?
Excuse me if I'm not a prude . . . (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Excuse me if I'm not a prude . . . (Score:2)
Some of us actively look for it... ; )
Great, then don't install it (Score:2)
Re:Great, then don't install it (Score:2)
Re:Great, then don't install it (Score:2)
Hey, at my elementary school, there wasn't even an art department! There was just an art teacher who would come in once a week. She didn't bring any naked pictures, either. It was normally just paints and construction paper, and on occasion some popcorn seeds.
I have trouble seeing nudity in an art department going over in any US elementary school after that incident with Janet Jackson a
Re:Excuse me if I'm not a prude . . . (Score:1)
Re:Excuse me if I'm not a prude . . . (Score:1)
I don't know about spam, but regarding viruses the keyword here is fuck. Some viruses are easier to contract after you two got naked.
Re:Excuse me if I'm not a prude . . . (Score:1)
Firefox download setting? (Score:1)
Re:Firefox download setting? (Score:1)
Siteadvisor is better (Score:4, Interesting)
Next Gen Browsers? (Score:1)
Well, on the other hand (Score:3, Funny)
clickety clack (Score:1, Funny)
Re:clickety clack (Score:1)
Gossip Folks (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Gossip Folks (Score:1)
Yeah, I've seen those warnings before... (Score:2)
Viewfour.com stops everything (Score:1)
They just don't care (Score:4, Insightful)
1) It's not their computer (their employer's, internet cafe's, school's, library's, etc.) so they don't care.
2) They go around with the thinking, "I'm nobody important, so why would they hack me? They only hack VIPs."
These users are JUST AS BIG a problem as the hackers, phishers, and scammers, for they enable and encourage botnets, theft, etc. Too often these idiot end users and incompetent systems admins are left alone. I say we go for a "tough love" policy. F*ck around the net? Get your computer/network completely blocked. Want to get it unblocked? Read a long-ass pamphlet regarding the safeguarding of your computer/network, take a quiz, and sign a paper agreeing to follow stricter guidelines. If you get warned repeatedly, you're either fined or taken offline permanently.
Now THAT, would get everyone's attention, and force morons off the net, where they don't belong.
This involves nudity....... how? (Score:2)
Take playbloy.com for example, I highly doubt that there are any viruses or trojans on that site, yet there's a hell of a lot of nudity.
Now, take other "OMFG FREE P0RNZ CLICKZ0RZ H3R3!!!ONE!" sites that display some random pornographic image while it tries to install no less than 3 trojans on your system. Less nudity, more scamming.
No Slashdotter Will use this (Score:1)
Protecting MS windows machines from spyware. (Score:2)
I expect this "research" to more or less stay on the paved road. You start at CNN, slashdot and the microsoft home page click on the links, and avoid clicking the obviously pornographic adds.
So, if you do that, obviously some "straight" sites somehow still infect those MS Windows machines.... Either they buy an add with a bigger add-distribution club, or they have a c
Nudity (Score:1)
Well that does it! (Score:1)