Possible Antibiotic for MRSA Superbug 210
darkmeridian writes "Merck has discovered a possible treatment for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA, a virulent superbug resistant to many current antibiotics. The new compound, platensimycin, was found in a sample of South African soil and works by preventing the bacteria from assembling fatty acids into its cell membrane. This mechanism of action is novel among antibiotics, most of which currently block DNA assembly or protein assembly. Of course, this product still has to undergo human testing, but apparently looks promising."
Re:Superbug vaccine... (Score:5, Informative)
As a result, they weren't able to close the wound immediately, and in fact had to debride it a number of times. Eventually, they had to put him on vancomycin (once it was clear he had an antibiotic resistant strain), which is a very powerful antibiotic with a number of side-effects.
Links (Score:4, Informative)
"Vancomycin and teicoplanin are glycopeptide antibiotics used to treat MRSA infections."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MRSA [wikipedia.org]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vancomycin [wikipedia.org]
Plus you get some free karma for doing it. Always works!
Re:A cure you say? (Score:2, Informative)
and as with most things in nature, if it can, it will... (or someone will do it for it...)
Re:Coming Soon (Score:3, Informative)
Re:"Scientific American" Reports on New Antibiotic (Score:3, Informative)
Vanco can be taken orally (Score:1, Informative)
Re:A cure you say? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Source...code. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Another anti-MRSA agent: Mangosteen (new link) (Score:2, Informative)
For more information from PubMed on the mangosteen fruit and its benefits, see these articles at PubMed via NIH.gov [nih.gov]. Or, go to my website [goxan.net].
Re:"Scientific American" Reports on New Antibiotic (Score:5, Informative)
One nice side benefit was I got immunized against this sucker although that did carry some risk as well (experimental vaccine and all). Not that I ever expect to need it, but you never know.
MRSA colonization. (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd
MRSA is typically resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics, including penicillins and cephalosporins. Just because it's resistant does not mean that it's going to eat away at your flesh. Methicillin sensitive strains will do that just as happily, particularly if they produce leukocidins (eg: MRSA strain USA300).
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd
Calling vancomycin a cure for MRSA is exceedingly short sighted. VRSA/VISA (the I stands for intermediate, not insensitive), is becoming increasingly common in some regions. Topical agents, such as mupirocin or chlorhexidine may help to attenuate nasal and skin carriage (groin, axilla etc), but reports of MuRSA are also beginning to surface. It's an uphill battle.
My advice? (And yes, I hold a PhD in the field). Avoid contributing to the problem. Don't suck down antibiotics every time you get the sniffles, especially if you don't have to. More importantly, if your doctor insists upon it, don't stop taking the antibiotics the moment you feel better: finish the entire course, as prescribed. Data to associate feedlot/livestock antibiotic supplements and the transmission of resistant pathogens into human populations is scant. Worry first about the factors you can control. Your children will thank you for it.
So true.... (Score:4, Informative)
The S. Aureus is a bacteria that lives on the skin and is harmless most of the time. I said "most", because the bugs is really nasty in some specific area :
- intensive care : patients aren't in good shape, and the bug tries to enter into them. (Some strains are very good at crawling along needles of perfusion)
- surgery : the few specimens that survived the disinfection may try to jump into the wound. Bones (like after an accident) are an example.of wound that aren't very well protected against infection (among other reasons : lower blood flow compared to other organs and thus harder to bring white blood cells and antibodies).
Because it lives on the skin surface they can realy easily travel from one individual to another, just by plain skin contact (think handshaking or on object that everyone touch). And because they're harmless most of the time, there are no symptoms (the carrier isn't sick) and they can travel unnoticed until they reach one critical patient.
So the only patient that is feeling realy bad is the one at the end of the chain (the one in critical care). Among the chain, there's a lot of people who aren't sick (and don't give a fuck about it) and (mostly healthy) people that may have minor skin wounds (requiring some treatement) but don't follow their treatment as they should (because they feel well).
And that's one reason why bacteria are exposed to sub-lethal doses of antibiotics, some of them surviving better, and evolution (huh... sorry... Intelligent Design) doing it's job and making better superbugs.
Note: other reasons appart from bad usage of antibiotics are :
- Moronic prescrition / Pharmaceutical over-hyping : Doctor hears that superbugs are common. Doctors hears about (=gets brainwashed by marketing departement) new superdrug that kills superbug. Doctor start prescribing superdrug for *EVERY SINGLE CASE*, even when not needed. Superbugs become Hyperbugs. repeat ad nauseam.
That's why method are developped to help determine when and what drug is needed. As a student a worked in such a lab [genomic.ch].
- Industrial agriculture : Some huge agricultural corporation do very stupid things which all end up with environnement becoming polluted with antibiotics and resistant bacteria appearing "in the wild" due to exposition to sub-lethal doses.
Re:"Scientific American" Reports on New Antibiotic (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Coming Soon (Score:4, Informative)
All forms of Staph aureus carry the toxin you mention, though, so there's really nothing to prevent you from getting MSSA necrotizing fasciitis.
And, yes, you pretty much need an intact immune system to successfully fight off infection. We can pump you full of every antibiotic known to man and cause every single bacteria in your system to explode, but without neutrophils and macrophages to clean up the resultant toxic mess, you're likely to eventually go into septic shock, which frequently means an eventual trip to the morgue.
Re:Superbug vaccine... (Score:3, Informative)
If the drug companies "benched" and old drug for say 10 or 20 years then there is a very good chance that it would become effective again.
The same evolutionary pressures that allow bacteria to gain resistance so quickly should help them loose it as well.