Corsair Nautilus500 External Cooling Kit 39
VL writes to tell us that they recently got a chance to review the latest external water cooling kit from Corsair. It seems that in addition to the performance boost it was also extremely easy to use. From the review: "As you can see above, the Nautilus500 was significantly quicker to install than the other two kits. The reason for this is that the motherboard needs to be removed before installation for both the EXOS and Aquagate, but not for the Nautilus500. Keep in mind that we're very familiar with the Aquagate Mini and Koolance EXOS, so those times are about as low as they get (for us anyway). We think we can maybe shave another minute for the Nautilus, but either way, a liquid system installed under 10 minutes is pretty impressive."
But is it compatible... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:But is it compatible... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:But is it compatible... (Score:1)
How about for a quad processor server. (Score:2)
Re:How about for a quad processor server. (Score:1)
Does anyone know if the heat reduction would make a major difference in the server room?
Off the top of my head I am guessing that removing the heat of 12 Xeons is not going to make enough difference to justify the time and expense. If it did, then all I would need would be a way to cool all the Ultra 320 15K RPM drives.
bull (Score:2)
Re:bull (Score:2)
Aha! I found him! [k12.nc.us]
Damn those clowns!!!!
I'm going to have nightmares now, you know. (Score:1)
Re:bull (Score:2)
It'd be nice if they had coolers that clipped into the existing cooling b
*dons the Carson turban* (Score:4, Funny)
Mr. Mysterioso will now guess the contents of the review!
*clicks link*..."a two-guys-in-a-garage hardware review ladies and gentlemen!"
All jokes aside: "Our findings were confirmed with Corsair in a conference call and we were informed that future units will have this warning updated in their manual."
What the hell? "Conference calls" with the company that made the product they reviewed?
Re:*dons the Carson turban* (Score:2)
Wake me up when someone makes a water cooling kit that costs less than a motherboard.
How many people care about install times? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:How many people care about install times? (Score:3, Interesting)
It's not time really, it is of course complexity of installation. They want to make it sound easy, as not to drive people off. Saying "it takes 2 minutes" is a succinct way of selling the product as a ''yes, even you can do it!''-kit.
The producers want to expand beyond the subset of /. crowd, after all.
Re:How many people care about install times? (Score:1)
Plugging in the Molex power connection tool 13 seconds, again a long time for the same reasons above.
The art of sprint installation! I'm imagining guys installing this stuff on timer mats like the cup-stacking people.
I'll try and shave off seconds from tasks I do several times an hour in an editor, but as long as installing doesn't take hours I don't really care.
neat... (Score:1)
thus it looks like you'd have to remove the thing before you could transport the PC anyhere...
and i'm not trying to flamebait or anything... and I don't overclock... so maybe that's part of the reason why
Not quite true... (Score:5, Informative)
"Each complete kit includes pre-fitted, pressure tested tubing that can easily be adjusted to shorter lengths without the fear of accidental leakage. For mobility-minded users and LAN party gamers, the kit also include quick connect self-sealing connectors to avoid having to drain the liquid during transport. (This also helps during initial installation)."
If you look at the instruction manual, or the review posted in TFA, you can see the quick disconnects.
With water cooling, leakage is always a concern - but these things are so well made that I've never even heard of someone's water cooling unit crapping out on them and frying their system. I *HAVE* heard of failure of fans in air cooling systems that destroy the processors - and while a good deal of that might be simply because so many more people USE air cooling, I think it would be unfair to say that the risk of leakage is so iminent that these units aren't worth installing.
Remember, the people who buy these units are the people with very, very nice computers, and as such, they take great care to make sure they don't get ruined. With a little care, it's easy to ensure that the risk of leakage is negligible.
Re:Not quite true... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Not quite true... (Score:1)
Re:Not quite true... (Score:2)
I have - it happened to one of my friend's system. He was tweaking around with tubing, though, adding parts from the hardware store (for some reason).
Watercooling is not for the uninitiated. It can be done very, very well, but if you screw it up, it can really screw things up.
In my friend's case, it "didn't" fry a brand-ne
Re:neat... (Score:2)
you want done right? (Score:1, Insightful)
take your pick
Re:you want done right? (Score:2)
That's sort of the point.
Re:you want done right? (Score:2)
Water heat exchangers belong on cars, not microchips. This is insane.
if it is as good as the Hydrocool 200EX (Score:1)
Air or water: which one has lower fire risk? (Score:1)
Re:Air or water: which one has lower fire risk? (Score:2)
What ppl always forget (Score:1)
Corsiar has done this before (Score:1)