Dvorak Avocates Open Sourcing OS X 571
xzvf writes "Dvorak claims OS X and Apple in trouble. He suggests open sourcing OS X for an epic battle with Linux. In many ways, this is just insane rambling, but it's certainly entertaining on some levels." From the article: "That would make the battle between OS X and Linux the most interesting one on the computer scene. With all attention turned in that direction, there would be nothing Microsoft could do to stem a reversal of its fortunes. Let's start at the beginning. There's been a lot of fuss over Apple's rollout of the unsupported Boot Camp product, which lets Mac users run Microsoft Windows easily on an Intel-based Macintosh. I got into various levels of trouble when I suggested that Apple was going to gravitate towards Windows since it would be easy to do and there was some evidence that the company might want to do it."
Open up Cocoa (not going to happen) (Score:4, Insightful)
"In many ways, this is just insane rambling." (Score:5, Insightful)
Epic battle with Linux? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:"In many ways, this is just insane rambling." (Score:1, Insightful)
Moronity (Score:5, Insightful)
No there wasn't.
Getting OS X onto PCs might be even more doable today, since researchers are reporting that as many as half of the business-owned PCs in operation now may not be capable of running Microsoft Vista.
And any random crap hardware that can't run Vista should have no trouble running Mac OS X! Piece of cake.
The Boot Camp product is pure test marketing. It's so obviously test marketing that it's hard to believe that people are foolish enough to get worked up about it.
Yes, Apple announced that this functionality will be built into the next version of Mac OS X, because they want to wait and see how people react before they decide whether it's a good idea. Because if they had already decided it was a good idea, they would have done something differently.
Does Windows works well on Mac hardware, or not? The idea here is to put it into the wild and see what happens in a support-free environment where Apple has no responsibility to help make it work.
Does Windows work well on PC hardware, or not? That's debatable, but obviously Apple thinks they can make it work just as well on Mac hardware. Does it yet? No. That's why Boot Camp is in beta. There are bugs they need to work out. Some of them are documented.
Apple needs to analyze the reaction to Windows on a Mac. This includes seeing whether there is massive rejection of the idea--protests, picketing, egg-throwing, and flaming. In other words, can the community at large live with the idea of Windows running on a Mac? That cannot be known or assumed without this test.
Nope, it can't be known. Absolutely no way to even guess. It's not like you could ask people. You know, take a survey. And I mean a real one, not PC Magazine's equivalent of a Slashdot poll.
Much of the positive reaction, though, seems to stem from the mistaken supposition that having Windows on a Mac will make OS X look better by comparison, so people will flock to OS X.
Really? That's not the reaction I've been hearing. The two reactions I've been hearing are:
I didn't bother continuing to the next page.
Microsoft Has Nothing to Fear From Apple (Score:2, Insightful)
A simple request (Score:2, Insightful)
I mean if you're going to post bullocks like this in one category it's only fair to accept them in all categories!
Re:Open up Cocoa (not going to happen) (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:This doesn't make any sense (Score:5, Insightful)
So says you. Have you ever seen recent Mac hardware from nearby (and I mean recent as in less than five years old)? It's not just beautiful, it's solid and durable. Look inside one and the attention to detail seems immediately obvious. I have never seen a PC box or laptop that comes close, although some try.
Yeah, so I'm an Apple fanboi. Sosumi.
Insanity-What's in it for everyone? (Score:1, Insightful)
Do your part ! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Open up Cocoa (not going to happen) (Score:5, Insightful)
Apple has very carefully created a boutique quality to their products. This was a calculated move. To strive for dominance would bring much of the hip-and-cool aspects of Mac culture to an end.
Apple's real future. (Score:2, Insightful)
The boot camp strategy seems to be a way to allow someone to own and use an apple while still retaining their legacy M$ software. Eventually the customer will abandon the M$ partition for everything but that application (game) that still doesn't run on apple. Meanwhile, Apple is selling overpriced very reliable computer systems to people who discover that computers don't have to crash on a regular basis.
At some point the developers will notice this fact and provide programs that run on both platforms. When that happens M$ dies (or it adapts).
Re:"In many ways, this is just insane rambling." (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Dvorak is totally insane (Score:3, Insightful)
I am really not sure why this is news (Score:5, Insightful)
Apple has the best sales they've ever had, they have no reason to open source it, and it's just... nonsense to anyone.
Looking at Slashdot posts he thinks
* Apple is going to move to Windows
* Microsoft should buy Opera
* Apple are promoted by news people more than they are used
* the Creative Commons license is worth trashing
* That Apple's move to Intel will harm Linux
* Google is planning a web browser
* Apple should discontinue the Mac
* TiVo is a way of stealing programming
Make your own opinions. Mine is that he's a poor troll. Okay, so he correctly predicted that Apple would move to Intel. But if you fire enough shots and make enough random predictions, you're eventually going to get one on the bullseye.
Re:Open up Cocoa (not going to happen) (Score:5, Insightful)
But Apple & Linux are natural allies. (Score:5, Insightful)
Certainly the recent rise of OS X on the back of the iPod has hurt desktop Linux, but these two desktop OS's appeal to completely different market segments so they are natural allies, not adversaries.
Linux attack MS from the low-end and is particularly strong in corporate, third world, and limited use, environments. It is flexible and is appealling technically and politically, but is quite rough and not ready for the average consumer.
OS X is the opposite. It is high margin, high sytle, and slick. It is perfect for the brand-concious, reasonably wealthy, consumer who wants everything to work together easily.
I'm not suggesting that Apple would intentionally help Linux, anymore than MS would, but Apple and Linux are not exactly on a collision course!
How quickly he revises... (Score:4, Insightful)
"I got into various levels of trouble when I suggested that Apple was going to gravitate towards Windows since it would be easy to do and there was some evidence that the company might want to do it."
What he actually said was that Apple would ditch OS X for Windows. What Apple actually did was allow people who want to run Windows -as well- to install it on a second partition, obviously with the intention of providing a safety net to would-be switchers.
I like John, but I'd rather he not try to restate what he previously stated to make himself look smarter than he really is.
I want that job! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:How can I get his job? (Score:5, Insightful)
Complete Nonsense (Score:3, Insightful)
So back to the hardware. Whatever premium you think exists (I disagree) on Mac Gear is what my good friend and I call "Worth Every Penny." I've seen an iBook that a caring mother drove over with her BMW X5, sure the LCD was cracked but system still booted in FireWire mode and I was able to retrieve all the documents they needed. My own 12" alBook has been used and abused by myself since they were released and through nearly 2 years now (3 years on an iBook) of my sister's college education without a single failure. I'm kind of upset that I even bothered buying AppleCare for it since I've never had to call them once, not once.
My iMac G5 is one of the most brilliant home computers ever created. One power cord runs the whole system. One. The case is practically seamless and is almost as easy to move around my home as my old powerbook was. When I first shipped it to work some antiMac socialist went crazy and asked why I didn't buy some gateway that was "the same case and form factor and is no different" - http://content.gateway.com/www.gateway.com/img/pro d/249x176/prf55c_pd.jpg [gateway.com] - ya freaking right.
I will unplug my internet connection and live in a cave before I buy a "Mac" installed on some beige box AlienDellWare piece of shitbox.
Sorry for the rant, I was up for a little karmaburn anyway.
Re:This doesn't make any sense (Score:3, Insightful)
OS X and the hardware it runs on are simply reflections of how Apple does things. It isn't just the software. The reliability of OS X would approximate Windows pretty quickly if they had to support all the different hardware Windows does. We'll see where this goes, but were I Dell, I'd be offering extravagant discounts to educational institutions about now. Apple will crush the competition in Education when Leopard comes out.
Re:But OS X _is_ open source. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:This doesn't make any sense (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:This doesn't make any sense (Score:2, Insightful)
Pricey.. yeah.. But every PC manufacturer is trying to make half assed copies of their hardware designs.
Re:Other things John Dvorak is "advocating" (Score:5, Insightful)
Not true. Angie and Natalie would get free Jello.
Re:This doesn't make any sense (Score:3, Insightful)
Doesn't make business sense either (Score:3, Insightful)
For Apple, running Windows on Apple is perfectly okay because it means people are still buying Apple hardware. However, it is not in their interest to be, primarily, a windows computer manufacturer because then they suddenly have to compete with Dell, etc. They derrive value from having a unique experience with the slick hardware and the nicely integrated OS.
It is furthermore not in the immediate interest of Apple to offer OSX on non-apple hardware. The risk they face there is, once again, people defecting to cheaper hardware. This could change in time though. The position they are in now is that people can get an Apple laptop and become familiar with the Apple experience without abandoning Windows completely. It makes it possible for business users to have chic Apple hardware but still run their company's Windows based software.
So open sourcing will not happen. It's too important to Apple to keep a tight control over the experience of using Apple products. Once they set the code free they can't control what happens. Imagine the mistake of clone licensing repeated with no ability to undo the mistake and you see where this goes.
Re:Open up Cocoa (not going to happen) (Score:5, Insightful)
No you see, while you spent your time posting as an AC on Slashdot, Steve Jobs actually went out and did it.
Re:Actually it's the integration... (Score:3, Insightful)
Also the grandparent post misses the way that truly standardized hardware makes it significantly easier for Apple to make its lovely software.
There are a few things here and there I'm not crazy about w/ my G3 iBook, like the single mouse button, and some other thins that probably because of over exposure to Windows I'm not comfortable with, but overall it's a much more well tuned experience, and I love that the hardware doesn't bake my lap...
Re:Open up Cocoa (not going to happen) (Score:5, Insightful)
True, and this is the key reason why Dvorak is clueless. He says Apple is doomed because they will never dominate the desktop or monopolize like Microsoft. If Apple not overtaking Microsoft is considered failure, then sure they're doomed, and something crazy like open-sourcing OSX may become necessary. But back in the real world, Apple is sitting pretty with the small marketshare they have, and I see their star rising with the path they're currently taking, not falling as Dvorak confusingly suggests.
What a bonehead (Score:3, Insightful)
So Johnny, let me give give you a key insight you'll need to hold onto whenever you write anything about Apple: Jobs doesn't want to win, he wants to be the best.
(PS - I do not and have never owned an Apple computer, so this is not fanboi crap.)
Re:Moronity (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, personally, I would much rather work and play in OS X. But if I have no choice, because I game I want to play is available only for Windows, or because my employer requires me to use a Windows-only application, I'm willing to tolerate Windows for as brief a period as possible before returning to OS X.
Re:Open up Cocoa (not going to happen) (Score:2, Insightful)
iTunes is also the most popular digital song file online store. I'm pretty sure that it's share is greater than all the rest combined (with a little help from it's integration with the iPod).
He wasn't directly involved, but do you think Apple could have done all this without him leading the company?
Re:Open up Cocoa (not going to happen) (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:This doesn't make any sense (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Open up Cocoa (not going to happen) (Score:2, Insightful)