The Beatles, Apple, and iTunes 367
novus ordo writes "Apple is being sued in London by Apple Corps, owned by the former Beatles and their heirs. This is a third battle over the name 'Apple' in Britain. Apple Corps has previously been awarded $26M by Apple Computer for the use of the name."
Get the facts straight... (Score:3, Informative)
Wrong. They weren't awarded anything. They settled. As far as I know, this didn't even get to court.
Re:Interesting that ... (Score:3, Informative)
Yes. Apple Group are trying to get money out of Apple Computer for breaking the agreement that they came to in 1991.
The fact that this wasn't resolved years ago shows both the incompetence of the Apple Computer Lawyers
(smacks forehead).... no, no it doesn't.
Re:FYI, The Beatles were a popular beat combo... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Maybe Steve Jobs should be interrogated by Bria (Score:1, Informative)
B) They're now very much in the same business. Apple Corps distributes music. Apple Computers now distributes music, so there is market overlap. That's a serious undermining of Apple Corps' trademark, and the impact is far from negligible. You, for example, don't seem to know about Apple Corps. There's no way anybody talking about Apple Music is going to think of the Beatles' company anymore. Apple computer has stolen the name.
C) What's this nonsense about the post office? If the post office renamed itself Apple Mail, you can bet Apple Computer would be all over them with suits. The post office, Amazon and DHL are not named Apple, so they have nothing to do with this.
What Apple Record's trademark covers (Score:3, Informative)
Class 09: Sound recording and sound reproducing apparatus and instruments; radio transmitting and radio receiving apparatus and instruments; video and sound records in the form of discs, films, tapes or filaments; and parts included in Class 9 for all the aforesaid goods.CANCELLED IN RESPECT OF:All goods except sound recording, sound reproducing, radio transmitting and radio receiving apparatus and instruments and parts for all the aforesaid goods, none being computers or goods of the same description as computers, but not cancelled in respect of video and sound records in the form of discs, films, tapes or filaments. I.e. Apple Records' trademark only covers physical recordings.
Re:Apple Corps - New Release Coming 11 April 2006 (Score:4, Informative)
I'm not a lawyer, but I sure think that Apple Corps has a great case. There is both precedent where Apple Computer lost and paid damages and there is retention of trademark which is, as stated above, still in active usage.
Re:Gah? (Score:3, Informative)
Parlophone.
Apple Corps (Score:2, Informative)
what the heck they really were all about it's here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Corps [wikipedia.org]
Really a tax dodge for the Beatles at the time.
None of the other divisions really panned out.
In fact:
"When the Beatles' partnership was dissolved in 1975, dissolution of Apple Corps was also considered, but it was decided to keep it going, while effectively retiring all its divisions. The company exists today, mostly performing as the licensing agent for Beatles-related products, and supervising reissues of Apple Records, plus new issues of Beatles recordings and related media. The company is apparently now owned by Apple Corps SA (a Swiss company) and its company secretary is listed as Standby Films Ltd., believed to be a vehicle of managing director Neil Aspinall. The company is currently headquartered at 27 Ovington Square, in London's prestigious Knightsbridge district."