Mozilla Firefox 2 Alpha 1 Available 327
Mini-Geek writes "Code-named Bon Echo, the first Alpha of Firefox 2.0 is now officially available. You can download it at ftp.mozilla.org. From the article: 'Here are some new features in Bon Echo Alpha 1 that require feedback: Changes to tabbed browsing behavior, New data storage layer for bookmarks and history (using SQLlite), Extended search plugin format, Updates to the extension system to provide enhanced security and to allow for easier localization of extensions, Support for SVG text using svg:textPath'"
But... (Score:4, Insightful)
Getting a Firefox Alpha (Score:2, Insightful)
That's all? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Really? (Score:3, Insightful)
It's still just an alpha though.
Firefox 2 (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I hope they don't change the tabs too much (Score:5, Insightful)
You don't need a database for sorting algorithms (think gnu sort), but what this will almost certainly do is complicate backup and transfer of bookmarks. I really can't understand what is wrong with a simple text file. Do they not see all the issues Microsoft has because of their registry format??? This is NOT a speed or sorting issue. (I could care less about the history, but don't think that will help anyone other than some possible edge cases there either.)
This will also almost certainly kill any chance of reusage of bookmark data by other programs - which could be a really inovative area if the barrier to entry is kept low. They need to read the Art of Unix Programming [faqs.org].
Re:How soon to version 3.0? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:So basically ... (Score:2, Insightful)
If by Microsoft-esque you mean that version 1 has the features to keep 99% of the user base happy, you're absolutely right.
As far as the "average user" is concerned, what features is Firefox actually missing right now? It renders webpages, keeps bookmarks, has tabs and stores webpage passwords. That's enough for the vast majority of the world's users.
But would you prefer that the development team declare victory and stop coding? The Firefox team could stop development today and Joe User would be happily surfing with Firefox version 1 for many years to come. Any new developments are going to be for that last 1% category, because everyone else is happy.
Re:I hope they don't change the tabs too much (Score:1, Insightful)
Databases are only intimidating to people who don't understand them. I've never met a developer who, after learning what databases can do, didn't go absolutely crazy for them.
Re:ACID 2 (Score:3, Insightful)
IMO, the important question for a browser is can it render the kind of HTML you are likely to find on the net well. That includes broken, incorrect HTML. This idea that "well if all broswers mandidated good HTML, sites would fix it" is bunk. People are lazy, they make mistakes, sites will have broken code. The ability to render that well is an asset, just like it's an asset to be able to render complex code that uses cutting edge HTML features.
So I don't really care how FF ends up working on the Acid test, what I care about is pages looking good when viewed with it, which they do in almost all cases.