DRM More Important Than Life or Security? 427
An anonymous reader writes "Ed Felten of Freedom to Tinker has an interesting writeup regarding how copyright holders are still having serious objections to the built in exceptions of the DMCA even when it might threaten lives or national security. From the article: 'One would have thought they'd make awfully sure that a DRM measure didn't threaten critical infrastructure or endanger lives, before they deployed that measure. But apparently they want to keep open the option of deploying DRM even when there are severe doubts about whether it threatens critical infrastructure and potentially endangers lives.'"
Mr. President, we have a problem... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:In many countries... (Score:5, Funny)
And the logical conclusion to this is, that if you are caught red-handed violating copyright, you better punch, maim or kill the guy who caught you. You'll get a lighter sentence that way.
Re:In many countries... (Score:3, Funny)
The point is to make sure nobody can report on your copyright violation. So punching and maiming may not be enough ;-)
Re:"Copyright holders" don't give a fuck ... (Score:2, Funny)
There, fixed it for you.
Bin Laden sues! (Score:4, Funny)
"We're hoping that this lawsuit will yield considerable damages and provide an injunction that will prevent future attempts to defuse bombs.", Bin Laden states from his cave "It's the only way to stop piracy."
Re:The scorpion and the frog (Score:3, Funny)
I personally get all my philosophical and religious instruction from hack sci-fi writers. Just this morning, I sacrificed a goat to Harlan Ellison.
-Eric
US Democracy in a nutshell (Score:3, Funny)
Kang: "Yes, it's true, we're evil aliens, but there's nothing you can do about it. It's a two-party system! You'll have to vote for one of us!"
Guy in Crowd: "Well I believe I'll vote for a third-party candidate!"
Kang: "Go ahead, throw your vote away! Hahahahahaha"