Australian PM Has Parody Site Shut Down 289
babbling writes "The Australian Government has shut down a parody website that mocked Australian Prime Minister John Howard. The website featured a satirical speech that 'apologised' for the Iraq war. The site was down for two days before a phone call from Melbourne IT advised the owner that it had been shut down 'on the advice from the Australian Government'. A mirrored PDF copy of the "apology speech" is available."
Dumbest article quote (Score:4, Insightful)
Not bloody likely.
To: "President" George W. Bush +1, Seditious (Score:0, Insightful)
Shut down this Al-Qaeda Portal [whitehouse.org].
Attack Iran. They want to sell oil for Euros.
Feloniously as always,
President-VICE Richard B. Cheney
Fascism spreads (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Dumbest article quote (Score:5, Insightful)
Why can't people take a joke any more? (Score:5, Insightful)
Politicians are in the public eye, and should expect satire and public attention. No one forced them to be politicians. Danish cartoons causing bloodshed, and now this. Does the Australian government think its people so dumb that they can't distinguish parody from sincerity?
What a miserable miserable world we live in.
Re:Parodies, "fair use" and Melbourne IT (Score:5, Insightful)
It's also rather counter productive since it gets a lot of people looking at whatever all this fuss is about.
Some people have no sense of humour (Score:3, Insightful)
Politicians should grow some thicker skin in Oz. Hard to imagine a more thin skinned bunch, what next, censorship, oh, wait, that's exactly what it is.
50 years ago, March 17th, 1956, Fred Allen, born May 31, 1894 in Cambridge MA to irish catholic parents, famed comedy writer and radio comedian, died of a heart attack while walking his dog.
I'll toast him with a pint of Guinness. Thanks Fred, for all the laughs.
Backfire! (Score:3, Insightful)
It would have been better to request that the material clearly be labelled "parody" or "fiction", because some wankers might be confused and think Howie is a nice guy.
Tired of John Howard and the like? VOTE THEM OUT (Score:5, Insightful)
People know censorship when they see it.
People do not like being censored.
I suggest if you are an Aussie and this bothers you, vote John Howard and his friends out of office.
Free speech in Austrailia? (Score:5, Insightful)
This wouldn't happen in the USA because we have free speech. Except if a lesbian is offended, then it's sexual harrassment. Or on campuses with a speech code. Or it you want to advertise cigarettes. Or alcohol. Or if you want to run political ads, then it might violate campaign finance reform, even if it's exactly like this John Howard web site.
So this wouldn't happen in the USA in the early 80s. We sort-of had free speech back then.
Satire (Score:3, Insightful)
Copying material for satire is probably legal in this case, but he should not have misrepresented ownership of the text he wrote.
Johnny gets tough! (Score:3, Insightful)
Well at last he's doing something about sedition [news.com.au] instead of just talking about it. I'd better stop thinking freely.
Any Australian would know this is a fake speech because the Mr Howard is pathologically unable to apologise for anything.
Re:Parodies, "fair use" and Melbourne IT (Score:5, Insightful)
The current Australian government's reputation doesn't help them though...
Particularly they have a very poor reputation as far as "supporting civil liverties on principle" is concerned. It is one of the few governments that is entirely happy for the US to keep its citizens who are terror suspects in Guantanamo Bay (on the grounds that that way Australia doesn't have to deal with them). Their attitude towards assylum seekers is notorious worldwide. And the opposition aren't actually much better - they have just successfully campaigned to remove accountability for controversial drug approvals from the Health Minister [who might have to justify himself to the Australian people] and pass it to an entirely unaccountable "panel of experts". I wonder how long before John Howard realises that so long as you pass all the unpopular decisions to an unaccountable "panel of experts" then no voter can ever reasonably complain about anything you do!
Re:Free speech in Austrailia? (Score:2, Insightful)
Yeah, lesbians are stopping free speech... nice one.
Re:It doesn't look like satire to me (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Tired of John Howard and the like? VOTE THEM OU (Score:5, Insightful)
We would, but there's nobody to vote into office. All we can chose from is a bunch of near-identical lying pricks.
Rights vs Laws (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:I'm glad to see... (Score:2, Insightful)
America has problems, yes, but when another country demonstrates their similar inperfections to the world, can't we hold them accountable without trashing the US in the same breath?
How about just a "Boo Australia" in this case?
Re:Parodies, "fair use" and Melbourne IT (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Chilling. (Score:5, Insightful)
It's an easy enough misunderstanding: a phishing site looks like a genuine site, but isn't.
Parody sites look like genuine sites too. That's the general point of parody.
Yes, he's missed the point that phishing is about data capture not misinformation but I wouldn't rag him too hard, he's in the right ballpark.
"The right ballpark"????? For Chrissakes....he's the chief technology officer at Melbourne IT [melbourneit.com.au]. If he doesn't fucking understand what a phishing site is, Melbourne IT Needs a new CTO.
What's more likely? That a CTO of a major ISP actually doesn't understand the concept of a 'phishing site', or said CTO is prevaricating because the Government is breathing down his neck? You do the math.
Re:Good (Score:3, Insightful)
We'd all do better off without such hateful speech.
Betterment through censorship is a one step forward-two steps backwards maneuver.
Re:Free speech in Austrailia? (Score:1, Insightful)
I'm glad at least someone is talking about how the Republican controlled federal government is constantly trying to limit our free speech and curtail our civil liberties, while weighing us down in record federal debt and promoting the outsourcing of American jobs to other countries.
And you're right, this shit wouldn't have happened here in the 90's, when we had a President who could balance the budget and capture terrorists who attacked the WTC.
I'm with you, let's vote against the Republicans this November. At least the Democrats have proven they can run the economy and capture terrorists.
Yeah, yeah, I know, you're absolutely right. Voting for some third party like the Libertarians or the Greens is a luxury we just can't afford this November. We can't afford to lose any more cities or start any more wars, which is always a possibility if the Republicans stay in power.
I'd rather (Score:4, Insightful)
Let me use an analogy... If I have some food on the corner of mouth after I eat, I hope my friends will tell me about it, and not just ignore it because some guy down the hall spilled his entire meal on his tie.
People from around the world point out our flaws because we're disappointing them. After we did so much to liberate the world from tyranny in the 20th century, they want us to continue in the 21st. And if we don't meet that benchmark, then they want to tell us to get better.
Re:Dumbest article quote (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Free speech in Austrailia? (Score:3, Insightful)
Can you tell the difference between criticisizing an individual, and generalizing about a minority? No?? I could tell...
Re:Free speech in Austrailia? (Score:3, Insightful)
I believe the first ammendment prevents the government from abridging free speech, not lesbians nor campuses.
Re:Free speech in Austrailia? (Score:1, Insightful)
Oh? How many people have they gotten killed in a pointless war so far?
Re:Parodies, "fair use" and Melbourne IT (Score:4, Insightful)
It's also bad press. Anyone/thing that can look at themselves and make fun of themselves or accept a good making-fun-of always comes out looking better in the end. In fact, they'd be smarter to publicize that they support the proprieter's free speech rights.
Trying to stifle speech, on the other hand, never, ever looks good.
Re:Free speech in Austrailia? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Parodies, "fair use" and Melbourne IT (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Parodies, "fair use" and Melbourne IT (Score:5, Insightful)
http://archives.californiaaviation.org/airport/ms
Re:Oh yes it does. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Parodies, "fair use" and Melbourne IT (Score:3, Insightful)
This is not true and you know it. Didn't your mother tell you not to tell lies? The health minister had a right wing Christian agenda. That's why many people in his own party voted against him.
Re:Parodies, "fair use" and Melbourne IT (Score:5, Insightful)
For non Australians, what *actually* happened, was that the Health Minister had veto power over a *single* drug - the abortion pill RU486 - and that veto power has been removed. The only reason the Health Minister even had such a veto was because several years earlier the Government had traded it for the support in Parliament of a Christian fundie independent MP, since at that time they needed it to have legislation passed.
The situation has *nothing* to do with "accountability" and everything to do with anti-abortion agenda of the Christian Right. Parent post should be modded "-1, Blatant Misinformation".