Next DVD Format War Still Wide Open 253
An anonymous reader writes "Despite the wishes of partisan players like Sony and Toshiba, many consumer electronics manufacturers are opting to support both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray discs in upcoming media players." From the article: "Consumer electronics maker LG Electronics and PC maker Fujitsu-Siemens both said on Thursday they would keep their options open after computer giant Hewlett-Packard said last month it would back HD DVD as well as Blu-ray. Bjorn Sehrm, senior director Digital Home of Fujitsu-Siemens, told Reuters: 'We are planning to put both in. We don't take a stand in that fight, and actually we're very sorry that fight is happening.'
Upgrade to the more constant Xvid format! (Score:5, Informative)
The unfortunate part is that you can't buy these superior Xvid files, because none of the companies that sell TV shows are willing to sell such a great product. Luckily, "torrent sites" have filled the gap in the market. They're against the law (assuming copyrighted content, that is...), but superior.
Upsampling DVD trumps all... (Score:4, Informative)
You can buy an upsampling DVD player at your local electronics store for a tenth of the price of a blu-ray or hd dvd player, and then you can sit on the sidelines and watch the current format war wage, and save yourself some money.
Re:Upsampling DVD trumps all... (Score:2, Informative)
That said I won't be buying one for quite a while as I think it's going to be a long, stupid, battle until one format finally emerges as a 'standard'. Until then I'll keep outputting 480i over HDMI from my Pio 79avi into my Pio 1130 and let the PDP do the heavy lifting for upscaling. It's pretty good but no comparison to REAL HD.
In the meantime I don't expect M$ and others to sit idly by. With the continuing drop in HDD prices and the advent of near plug & play connectivity it's quite conceivable that HTPC's could move into the current DVD space and pre-recorded hard-drives and/or download-on-demand for true HD content could make the whole format debate irrelevant. I'd certainly prefer not to cede M$ yet another potential monopoly position but the idiot$ letting this format war continue don't seem to understand that the clock is ticking.
Re:Who wins? (Score:5, Informative)
They actually came out with a new polymer covering for the Blu-Ray that's highly scratch-resistant. They did a demo a while back trying to jam a screwdriver into the disk and it was still fine. It's really quite an improvement.
>> "how much will your fingerprint or speck of dust stop the player from reading properly."
Possibly, but on the other hand that's not permanent damage
Re:Upgrade to the more constant Xvid format! (Score:3, Informative)
No you can't, smartass, because Xvid is open-source under a GNU GPL license. That means you couldn't wrap the format in any DRM format which restricts its open-source nature. In other words: Use Xvid, can't use DRM.
End of story.
-Eric
Re:Who wins? (Score:2, Informative)
Yeah, there's SED (Surface-conduction Electron-emitter Display) coming out fairly soon (probably 2007). That's basically flat CRT, with each pixel being an individual mini electron emitter (a la LCD).
Re:DVD -- schmevedee (Score:3, Informative)
You do know the resolution of a printed book is an order of magnitude greater than any screen, yes?
Re:Upsampling DVD trumps all... (Score:3, Informative)
My old set created extra horizontal and vertical lines that were halfway between the surrounding real lines. So if you had
blk|wht|blu
blk|wht|blu
red|wht|blu
it would upsample to
blk|gry|wht|ltb|blu
blk|gry|wht|ltb|blu
blk|gry|wht|ltb|blu
dkr|rgr|wht|ltb|blu
red|pnk|wht|ltb|blu
The result was seamless video that looked excellent.
Re:HD on Regular DVD! (Score:3, Informative)
There are HD files floating around out there [mvgroup.org], lots of really good Discovery channel and BBC shows in 1280x720 XviD format that look great and *surprise!* they are 700MB files (for a roughly 40 minute show) that will fit on a standard CD.
Re:Upgrade to the more constant Xvid format! (Score:3, Informative)
More important, as the other poster said, you could always simply use a different container, that included DRM, and drop Xvid and AC3 into it. You can embed Xvid into a Matroska container, or an MPEG4 container, etc... why not something proprietary? Now you have DRM, you've used Xvid, and you don't have to release anything to anyone.
Redundancy on DVDs and CDs (Score:3, Informative)
After re-reading your post, it sounds like you're suggesting an additional layer of redundancy, but with the way the discs are encoded with error correction right now, an unrecoverable scratch would probably take out the backup, too.
I will not buy either FOR YEARS...if ever (Score:1, Informative)
Excuse me, but I dropped 3 Grand on an HDTV 3 years ago and do not feel like tossing it (or running it at a ridiculously low resolution) because of another draconian move on the part of the MPAA. Forget it. I'm out. The cash will go to Fidelity instead of Sony.
Re:Not getting burned again (Score:3, Informative)
Reach around. You'll find it's a paperclip in your back, not a knife.
If you have a 4-5 year old set, it's probalby a 720p display, or a 1080i CRT.
If you have a disc that uses analog downrez (ICT), your image will get scaled down to 960x540 before being scaled up for output. Still more image data than DVD (720x480), with every pixel perfect (since each is nicely scaled down from 4 soure pixels). For a set of your vintage, you probably won't miss much with ICT.
Also, ICT is optional on a per title basis. Several studios have said they aren't going to use it at all. And there is a labeling requirement - you can just avoid buying discs that use it.
So, if you want to boycott, boycott ICT discs. Tell the studios you won't buy any discs that use it. But if you love HD, don't deprive yourself of the first good HD format for consumers! HD DVD stuff looks great, completely devoid of the ugly MPEG-2 blocking artifacts seen in off-air or cable HDTV.