Kororaa Releases XGL LiveCD 65
Tony Tony Chopper writes "The team from Kororaa who brought us a GUI based Gentoo installer have just released the first live CD to use xgl technology. From Kororaa.org, the lead developer Chris writes 'Today I am happy to release a Kororaa Live CD showcasing Xgl technology.' The response so far have been incredibly positive, an article at tuxmachines.org is glowing with much praise and few complaints. For those who love eye-candy but don't want to mess with their existing installs, this is the perfect opportunity to see what Xgl is about. The torrent can be downloaded from LinuxTracker."
Mirrors. (Score:5, Informative)
here [rdt1.org] (thanks to rdt1.org [rdt1.org])
here [mudrii.ath.cx] (thanks to Mudrii)
here [hotel-peter.net] (thanks to Hotel Peter [hotel-peter.net])
here [overconfident.org] (thanks to Over Confident) [overconfident.org]
here [bytemark.co.uk] (thanks to sefcom [sefcom.nl])
here [digitalextortion.com] (thanks to Digital Extortion) [digitalextortion.com], and
here [snipanet.com] (thanks to Chris Peters from Canada)
here [atarack.com] (Atarack VDS/VPSes who are our proud sponsors) [atarack.com]
(To buy an atarack VPS e-mail us at sdhillon@atarack.com or at ndevito@atarack.com)
Re:zomg, sweet (Score:5, Informative)
Yes. Of course not automatically, but it does provide a technical means that makes things possible that will increase usability. Take the expose like feature, or live previews when alt-tabbing, for example. And will of course make implementing accessibility (sp?) like zooming much easier to implement.
"Not to mention the obivous questions like "will my crappy integrated graphics card even come close to running this?""
I think one of the best things about XGL (and AIGLX for that matter) is that the hardware requirements for this are actually pretty low. So if you integrated graphic chip does do opengl, it should work.
Of course keep in mind that this thing is still in beta and that many drivers still lack the opengl extensions needed, so that many things that later will be done in hardware are now actually done with mesa in software.
That said, despite these problems, XGL runs very smooth on my quite old and not very powerful Geforce.
Re:Some thoughts. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Hardware requirements? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Why a LiveCD? (Score:4, Informative)
* Because not everyone can boot from USB
* Because practically everyone has a CD drive
* Because it's easier to boot from a CD
* Because it's a lot cheaper to give your friend a CD than a thumb drive
Don't buy the anti-Xgl FUD, check it yourself (Score:2, Informative)
Xgl development is being done highly cooperatively and has been so for many months --- it's all there in the mailing list, for anyone who wants to check the evidence. The business hand of Novell is nowhere to be seen, so all this talk of "proprietary" is the sheerest nonsense, especially since Novell owns SuSE. And on top of that, Xgl is not a replacement for X, but merely another X server which you could run alongside your standard one but on a different VT.
And then there's the "AIGLX is the same X server" nonsense that's coming out of Fedora. It's not, it's a different X server altogether but with code derived from the standard one. It would replace your existing X server, exactly like Xgl does. Plus, Aiglx is totally unusable by 99% of the population since it only supports the fully open drivers currently, so general support is pure vapourware at this time. And to cap it all, Xgl is being labelled as "proprietary" and "developed behind closed doors" when actually it's the other way around --- there has been no open development of Aixgl whatsoever, instead it's been a closed-door development between Fedora and the highly proprietary nVidia, with no public community input.
So you see, things are not at all as they have been portrayed.
I'm not sure why, but there's some monkey business going on here, and Fedora is not occupying the moral high ground at all. It looks like corporate bickering to me. Anyway, beware the FUD.
Re:Slow? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Why a LiveCD? (Score:3, Informative)
Tantalizing and frustrating (Score:2, Informative)
Not GPL licenced! BSD / MIT (Score:3, Informative)