AOL Hopes to Change Image With Services 197
Geoffrey writes "'In an effort to earn a new reputation as a leading Internet destination, AOL will open up to a wider audience on the Web through AOL.com. The portal will re-launch in beta form on Tuesday, offering visitors free Web mail, exclusive audio and video content, and access to a number of AOL services previously available only to subscribers,' reports BetaNews. The new AOL.com will highlight news from the blogosphere, offer free access to 15,000 videos, 130 radio stations, and 20 XM stations. In addition, AOL is launching an RSS aggregator that aims to make RSS actually simple for normal Web users. And unlike MSN's RSS endeavor, My AOL will work in Firefox, Safari and other browsers."
Frankly.. (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't know... (Score:3, Insightful)
I would be very surprised if they could pull this off.
Oh great.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Wider audience, but just as dumb (Score:3, Insightful)
I notice they don't intend to change what kind of users they want to attract. I mean, how hard is it to use RSS these days? it's just one click to install a RSS newsreader (unless they're running into Bezos' patent or something).
Re:I don't know... (Score:5, Insightful)
I would also be surprised if they could pull something like this off... the internet portal market is already quite crowded. I just don't see room for another yahoo-type service
Free != Good Service (Score:3, Insightful)
Good job, AOL. (Score:3, Insightful)
You have the manpower
You have the money.
Now go forth and make yourself into an ISP that doesn't suck.
There is a long road ahead of you though.
Modern as its competitors? (Score:2, Insightful)
Most people I know don't even associate AIM with AOL, and when that's the case, providing content that's been available through other portals for years will be quite a stretch to save the company. Catching up with the times alone will take a lot of work, but they can't be 'as modern as their competitors' to survive. They're going to need to be much more advanced to shoot past everyone else and escape the grim fate that looms overhead.
Too much mindshare (Score:3, Insightful)
AOL has brand name recognition with just about everyone in the U.S. The trouble is, when I think of AOL I think of those stacks of CDs in the Wal-Mart checkout isle and the endcaps at supermarkets. I don't think about any content I'd like to see there, despite the number of "content parters" they've signed up over the years.
It's the same reason Compuserve is such a non-player on the Internet. The industry shifted out from underneath them.
AOL wasted way too much corporate energy convincing their customers that they were the Internet, and didn't expend enough effort drawing in non-AOL dialup users with their content. Didn't they sign up exclusive content, so you couldn't get there unless you subscribed to AOL?
They're now paying for misreading the market, for not realizing that the money was in clicks, not in subscriptions.
Yes and No (Score:4, Insightful)
AOL's problem is the Internet-for-beginners stigma that's attached to their name. My bet is the better move would be to dump their millions into a new brand, push their current user base towards it, and hope the non-AOL users will underestimate the connection.
Re:Sorry AOL (Score:3, Insightful)
Like Nokia. They started out [wired.com] making rubber boots and toilet paper.
AOL's problem? (Score:2, Insightful)
- Treating its clients poorly
- Making the dollar its first and highest priority, and being obvious about it.
- Not truly changing with the times, instead just putting a new gloss(and more bloat)to its same, tired, design.
- Using spam type methods to try and hook new users(the famous coasters).
They did this to themselves through years of mismanagement and just settling for the status quo. They forgot they got to the top by out-innovating the competition like compuserve and prodigy, and making a smooth efficient internet portal for the time. Its like what happened to Netscape. Netscape was "the" browser because it was small, fast, efficient, and clean. When it bloated it died and took it mozilla and a reversion to its original design to bring it back.
The question is, can AOL really revert and recover from 10 years of bad reputation? I don't think it ever will.
Breaker 1-9 (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Sorry AOL (Score:3, Insightful)
Maybe that's what they're doing now? "Closing up shop, as you call it, is just stupid if they can reinvent who they are and evolve.
Ford made cars that were overtaken by technological advances in automobile design. They didn't "close up shop" - they evolved and improved their product (I drive a Jeep, so that's an assumption).