Inspecting MSN Search 345
ins0maniac writes "I compared Yahoo, Google and MSN's image search. I noticed that, MSN's search had images from only a few sites. I searched for keywords britney spears and randomly checked few pages upto page number 20 and found that the 400 images were only from 3 domains :| 5in9.com, celebritypicturesarchive.com and nabou.com. This is totally weird as it doesn't seem like a search engine, but a collection of few online galleries." There's a number of other interesting notes in the entry about the new search engine. Also, Britney.
mirrordot link (Score:5, Informative)
mirrordot doesn't seem to have archived all the images yet though...
Because everyon keeps asking... (Score:2, Informative)
goto:
http://search.msn.com [msn.com]
click settings:
[Which will bring you to:]
http://search.msn.com/settings.aspx?ru=%2f&FORM=S
Try not to get confused and think you're using google...
On the third section from the top click "off"
You'll find the "Save" button in the lower right hand corner if you scroll down.
I was going to read through the source code and post a GET link which would turn it off for you... but I'm not about to read through that code at 8:45 in the morning. Sorry, folks.
PS.. I notice there are different language settings.. do you suppose MS will offer translation services?
Re:I searched for keywords britney spears and ... (Score:4, Informative)
Sometimes, it's fun to be a physics grad...
Re:Slashdotted (Score:3, Informative)
Change the resolution, color depth, etc. and I change the checksum for the image, so the index fails to recognize that one picture is the "same" as another, just resized, etc.
So resize the image to a standard max size and depth (256x256 max size jpeg with retained aspect ratio), then hash the individual luminance data into a thumbprint that can be compared. Checking for dupes becomes easier and similarity checks are doable.
Its unusable (Score:1, Informative)
Search
Connect through a Spanish ISP and you get Spanish ones.
For example
1. www.lobocom.es/regdom.html
2. www.clikear.com
3. www.clikear.com/aspnet
4. mexico.clikear.com
5. www.empleo.net
6. www.ciberaula.com/curso/masteraspnet
7. www.ciberaula.com/curso/puntonet
8. venezuela.clikear.com
9. ecuador.clikear.com
10. www.filipenses.net
No mention of Microsoft and 2,3,4,8,9 are all parts of the same site!
Search for "Marseille by Night", Google gives you sites about the nightlife of Marseille. MSN gives me:
1. www.maketon.com/conciertos.php
A concert by a DJ called "Dj Jack de Marseille"
2. www.fyl.uva.es/~wgeolid/fajg/solidario/forosocial
About volunteers working NIGHT and day and having a meeting in MARSEILLE.
3. www.infoconciertos.com
Again it mentions a concert in MARSEILLE and a DJ playing at Gomma NIGHT.
Its all complete crap, absolute crap, its not turfing to say it, these results suck big time. They are no even in the same league as Google, Yahoo and the rest.
Britany appears under camel toe (Score:3, Informative)
Though, as if to prove your original point, adding 'britney' to that search also gets no results.
P.S. You'll almost certainly like cameltoe.bolt.com [bolt.com]
Britney? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Not your usual slashdotting (Score:2, Informative)
He didn't turn off domain grouping (Score:5, Informative)
Perhaps this guy didn't know the default setting on MSN search is to group results by domain. Maybe he should try agian with this setting off if he wants to see more variety of domains providing Britney pics.
Re:Msn doesn't find Gates' homepage - Google does (Score:2, Informative)
Performing an MSN Image Search for "Bill Gates [msn.com]", returns 2,134 images from a variety of web servers, although newsimg.bbc.co.uk seems to be the most popular server that offers images. They apparently didn't screen these, because the 6th and 10th images are Bill's Albuquerque arrest photo, and the ninth photo is a PhotoShopped image of Bill holding up a bright red nazi-like flag and saluting in nazi-esque fashion,...
Der Fuhrer Bill [future-technics.de]
To be fair, a Google Image Search for "Sergey Brin [google.com]", returns 500 images, and a similar search for "Larry Page [google.com]", returns 1,140 images.
Re:Standard MS Tactics (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Don't Underestimate Micro$oft (Score:3, Informative)
The advantage that M$ has, over Google, is its huge R&D budget.
Not really. Their advantage is that they have a monopoly consumer OS's. They will bundle their search with their OS, which is already bundled with their browser and their media player. Most users will never think to install something better, or go to google when their is a search already built in. It does not have to be as good as Google. It does not have to be close. It only has to be functional enough to barely work for most people's searches. It can return only 1/3 of the results Google does and have 10 times the ads and lack most of the cool features. All that it has to do is return basic results for the top 1K searches and it will win. You can't beat a monopoly's bundling without a vastly better system for the average user.
Think of it this way. If the telephone company gave out free cheese with every phone bill, what would happen to cheese sellers? Most would have to stop selling cheese. Maybe the phone company's cheese is not as good, but if it is not terrible, most people won't go buy more cheese from somewhere else. There will always be cheese and computer aficionados that will pay to get the best, but that is only about 5% of the market. The rest goes to the monopoly (which is why what MS is doing was made illegal in the first place).