FreeDOS Turns 10 Years Old Today 263
Jim Hall writes "The FreeDOS Project turns 10 years old today! PD-DOS was announced to the world on June 28, 1994. The PD-DOS project was later renamed to the FreeDOS Project. We've come a long way in 10 years. Today, FreeDOS is ideal for anyone who wants to bundle a version of DOS without having to pay a royalty for use of DOS. FreeDOS will also work on old hardware, in DOS emulators, and in embedded systems. FreeDOS is also an invaluable resource for people who would like to develop their own operating system. While there are many free operating systems out there, no other free DOS-compatible operating system exists. Read more about the FreeDOS Project history in the About FreeDOS page."
os development (Score:5, Funny)
Doesn't sound like the heritage I would like to learn from
Re:os development (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:os development (Score:5, Informative)
If one of those users wanted "complete control" of the computer - all they have to do is reboot the computer with an OS on a bootable CD (Knoppix, Gnoppix, etc). This can be done to take control of Linux, Win2K, WinXP, etc. NTFS is no obstacle, nor are the myriad of file systems available for use by a Linux installation. Encrypted file systems can prevent root access - but very few people have the time for this setup - plus recovery can be a real beatch.
The strong point of DOS is not being able to run another OS - it's being able to have more control over how you run certain applications. It can also facilitate recovery when things go wrong. The hardware requirements are less. Flexibility is a good thing. There is no need to port legacy apps that have been working flawlessly for years.
I personally dont use FreeDOS - I still have a Win98 partition with DOS installed. If I didn't own Win98 - FreeDOS is something I would explore for the rare occasions I would want to play old-school games.
DOS 6.22 (unsupported) can be downloaded free from: Micro$oft.com [microsoft.com]
Re:os development (Score:5, Funny)
No, in 95/98, all they needed to do was click escape at the login box.
Re:os development (Score:2)
Regardless, any user on Win9x could install/do/delete what they liked. Using DOS/FreeDOS provide similar flexibility (without needing to logon of course).
In many situations (like with my home PC) - physical access to the box by others is not a concern. At home I value the convenience over physical security as I know I am the only person who will sit at the keyboard. (yes I am firewalled - network security is another matter).
My point
Re:os development (Score:3, Informative)
Re:os development (Score:4, Funny)
Come on, it beats even Linux hands down in the remote exploit area! I can't say I know a single person that had his DOS boxed hacked into remotely. I guess it's because of this there was no DOS firewalls! Who needs them when it has rock solid network security!?
Re:os development (Score:3, Interesting)
Ever heard of PC Anywhere? Several times I have come across these things, hooked up to DOS based PCs. These are typically long-forgotten specialty boxes, such as the one controlling the community events board of a cable TV franchise.
DOS is still alive! (Score:5, Informative)
If you need some utilities to go along with freeDOS, try my site, Old Os [oldos.org] or if you have problems setting it up try our forums [oldos.org].
Will it run bash? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Will it run bash? (Score:4, Informative)
Then just use Linux, or if you strongly prefer Windows, use Cygwin. I use both equally. Perl is a standard package in Cygwin (have to select it, tho) or you can install Perl in Windows with several different binary ports.
For those of you that are unfamiliar with Cygwin (cygwin.com), its a Unix like environment for Windows. It takes up one directory and if you put the
The setup program lets you install Perl, GCC, plus other languages and compilers, and even an Xserver, although my luck with that is not so good. Even if you are a Windows only user, its a great way to get introduced to a fairly powerful shell, with several options like tch and bash, without the problems of a dual boot.
It is NOT "Linux in Windows", its a set of APIs to be able to compile and run many Linux programs from source, with just a few mouse clicks to install the most common programs. Find it here. [cygwin.com] It's Free.
Re:Will it run bash? (Score:2)
Re:Will it run bash? (Score:2, Insightful)
You're looking for a system on a chip, but you want to use bash?! Uh... you might want to consider re-weighing your priorities there: bash is huge, over 460KB on my personal system. You might also want to try looking into 4DOS [jpsoft.com].
Re:Will it run bash? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Will it run bash? (Score:3, Informative)
I know someone who ran the FSF's bash.exe through an exe-to-com converter, and then named it command.com. It worked, and viruses which typically depend on jumping to particular place in command.com to run something now failed. However, I believe Word Perfect 5.1 also would not run.
Re:DOS is still alive! (Score:2, Funny)
Yeah, I still really enjoy playing the Dunjonquest games under TRSDOS on the xtrs emulator. That is the DOS we're talking about, right?
No I didn't RTFA (Score:5, Funny)
The "About FreeDos" Page before it gets /.ed (Score:4, Informative)
FreeDOS aims to be a complete, free, 100% MS-DOS compatible operating system.
FreeDOS was previously known as "Free-DOS" and originally as "PD-DOS." For a little trip down memory lane: In 1994, I was a physics student at the University of Wisconsin-River Falls. Most of my work for school had been done using DOS - writing programs, dialing up to the university computer, network, analysing lab data, etc. I really loved DOS; I did everything with it. I had a '386 desktop system in my dorm room and an XT laptop that I would carry around with me to do work "on the go".
I liked the simplicity that DOS offered. As a DOS user, you have the equivalent of 'root' access on your computer. Anything that you want to do on the PC is possible. Nothing is really stopping you, other than hardware limitations. I found that this additional degree of freedom was nice to have, although since I worked in both environments (UNIX and DOS) I tended to write programs that stuck to "safe areas" that worked on both platforms. DOS was great.
But that year, there was an announcement that Microsoft would stop support for DOS, that a new version of Windows was going to be released that completely removed DOS from the picture. Of course, this was Windows 95, and it still did have DOS, but at that time we all had the vision that Microsoft was trying to kill our favorite operating system. Everyone was pretty shocked. We didn't want to be forced to use Windows, which completely removes the command line. In DOS, everything is done on the command line, and a true command line "guru" can do amazing things there. In Windows, you are stuck with the mouse, and if the menus don't let you do something, it pretty much can't be done. So things were looking pretty bleak. We were all very upset about Microsoft's decision to ditch the DOS platform.
Then, I saw a discussion thread [google.com] on the DOS groups asking "hey, why doesn't someone write their own free version of DOS?" Remember, this was about three years after Linus Torvalds announced his work on the Linux kernel, and by 1993 Linux had shown that free software can achieve incredible results. So in 1994, the suggestion that we could write our own free version of DOS, and give it away with the source code so others could work with it and improve it, really didn't sound all that far-fetched.
Unfortunately, no one seemed to pick up the ball. The idea sort of sat there, waiting. I didn't have much experience in writing C or Assembly programs (most of my analytical work in physics was limited to FORTRAN) but I had written some C programs. So I sat down one weekend and hacked out code for a bunch of DOS file utilities. I posted what I had done to the DOS newsgroups, and announced that I intended to form a group on the Internet to write our own free version of DOS.
I took the opportunity to fix some things. There are some things about what Microsoft did with DOS that do irk me. The biggest is that MS-DOS commands lack options, not that there are lots of MS-DOS commands anyway. I wanted to have more powerful tools than what MS-DOS provided me with. So I hacked some of my own. (I wasn't a strong C programmer at the time, so this wasn't very beautiful code.)
There were several "beta" pre-release packages of my stuff:
Afte
Don't trust those guys (Score:4, Funny)
Their project is basically a 16-bit wrapper of FreeWINDOWS product.
Does it play games? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Does it play games? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Does it play games? (Score:2, Informative)
Moll.
Re:Does it play games? (Score:2)
Re:Does it play games? (Score:5, Informative)
The site's in Russian, but it's simple to use. You run it on the game executable to replace the extender it uses. After that it works fine. Some games seem to lock up on exit on my laptop, but everything works fine during play, so it shouldn't be a huge problem.
Re:Does it play games? (Score:2, Informative)
Games is why I use FreeDOS on my laptop (dual-boot with Slackware 9.1).
What I have on it now, which works: Boloball, Bridge, Checkkers, Civilization, Hexjump, Texas Hold'em, Battle for Atlantis, VGA Joust, Larn, Bugs, Othello, Starcon-1, Wari, WarZone, XCom, XCom Terror from the Deep.
What doesn't work: Warcraft-2.
What I have somewhere but haven't installed/tried under FreeDOS yet: Warcraft-1, Descent-I/II/III, Quake
-- TTK
Who the hell would want free DoSing... (Score:2, Funny)
It turns 10 today... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:It turns 10 today... (Score:2)
Re:It turns 10 today... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:It turns 10 today... (Score:3, Informative)
To quote another poster here on slashdot:
FD has been quite useable for many years. The fact its not reached 1.0 is mainly due to debates on optional features needed to call it '1.0', and not related at all to its stablity or useablity.
FreeDOS for BIOS flashing (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:FreeDOS for BIOS flashing (Score:3, Informative)
Re:OT, but may be good to know. (Score:2)
Re:OT, but may be good to know. (Score:3, Informative)
I actually installed FreeDOS in VMWare recently (Score:3, Informative)
(But, DOSBox worked once I played with frameskip!)
I think it's cool that we have these options today.
DOSbox (Score:3, Informative)
DOSemu (Score:3, Informative)
I'll keep trying new releases. Either it will improve or I'll come into a machine fast enough to emulate a P75 with it. The following specs seem to cover all the ground needed to play games before the Win95 era began.
Pentium 75
Soundblaster AWE32
32 MB RAM
Trio64/VES
Re:DOSemu (Score:4, Funny)
Or find an old P75 in the trash and use it to play those games...
Re:DOSemu (Score:2)
Ah, but space is at a premium. When you have a wife and kid and don't live in a big place, there is only room for one machine. The emulator doesn't take up space and isn't old cranky hardware that will have to be maintained.
Re:DOSemu (Score:2)
Pentium 233 MMX
ESS ES1868 ISA
96MB RAM
nVidia TNT2 M64 32MB PCI (no, that wasn't stock, stock was some Cirrus Logic card and a Voodoo I)
Why not just run a P75, AWE32, 32MB RAM, and a Trio64?
Parts of FreeDOS will live Forever (Score:2, Interesting)
10 years in the making! (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm not poo-pooing the effort, but you have to admit that that's a long time before declaring 1.0!
1.0 isnt a magic number (Score:5, Informative)
Re:10 years in the making! (Score:2, Funny)
Dell and FreeDOS (Score:5, Interesting)
http://www1.us.dell.com/content/products/compar
This is great as I've been buying the cheapest SC servers to avoid the microsoft tax. With prices starting at $319, i can now afford to buy the 20 or so systems i was planning on for the business. nice
Stupid Linux question??? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Stupid Linux question??? (Score:3, Informative)
Another stupid Linux question??? (Score:2)
Re:Another stupid Linux question??? (Score:2, Informative)
DOSBox (Score:2)
DOS is small! (Score:4, Interesting)
I just did a bootable 1.44MB FreeDOS floppy that plays mp3/ogg files with MPXplay [geocities.com], and then put it on to a bootable CD-ROM with all the music content I like. Voila, free, open source, standalone car/home/whatever music player which does not need a hard drive (for swapping). Just boot from ATAPI CD-drive and play some tunes, even at your friend's house!
Now try to do that with Linux/Windows/*BSD. I would have if I'd know how to do it. Preferably with a BSD system.
I was looking a player that could play tracker songs (you know, those before mp3s when 80386 and dinosaurs ruled the earth), mp3s and oggs, but no DOS player can do that as far as I know. XTC-Play [uni-koblenz.de] could do tracker songs and mp3s, but not oggs.
I will eventually put a website of the bootable FreeDOS ogg/mp3 CD project. Maybe post it here..
Re:DOS is small! (Score:2, Informative)
It could be fully loaded to RAM if you had enough, and you could add media to the CD or use a different CD.
It was created for media set top boxes, and having a stuff around on my desktop it looked
Re:DOS is small! (Score:5, Informative)
I just did a bootable 1.44MB FreeDOS floppy that plays mp3/ogg files with MPXplay, and then put it on to a bootable CD-ROM with all the music content I like. Voila, free, open source, standalone car/home/whatever music player which does not need a hard drive (for swapping). Just boot from ATAPI CD-drive and play some tunes, even at your friend's house!
Now try to do that with Linux/Windows/*BSD.
I did it three years ago:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/mjbd/ [freshmeat.net]
Free - XP (Score:5, Funny)
Windows on DOS on Linux? (Score:2, Interesting)
Is there a way to Windows 3.11 on top
of Linux, short of VMware?
Should a person expect Windows 3.11 to
run on top of DOSemu and FreeDOS?
OR would the original Windows 3.11 +
DOS 5.x be expected to runon top of
DOSemu?
If anyone has a definitive answer, I'd
like to know.
My guess... (Score:2, Interesting)
My point is Windows 3.11 probably did the same thing - it just "hooked" into DOS. In other words - the write byte to disk was at 0x3748443 (making this up)
BTW - OS/2 was rewritten for the PPC NOT ported.
Re:Windows on DOS on Linux? (Score:2)
Try this: (Score:2)
Cool! (Score:4, Funny)
FreeAS400
FreeOS360
FreeOS/2 (dammit!)
FreeLinux - Oh wait. Duh! My Bad. I got a little carried away here. Nothing to see.....Move along....
Re:Cool! (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Cool! (Score:4, Informative)
It isn't quite an OS, but GNUStep [gnustep.org] comes closest to being a FreeNeXTSTEP...
Thank you (Score:5, Insightful)
The DOS emulator in Windows is not especially great. Particularly, direct access to the video buffer is not always emulated correctly on my machine, the timer interrupt is not precise (not well-synchronized with other processes in the background), and a few other annoyances.
Instead of fighting and arguing with Windows, I took my old unused Pentium 1 and booted into FreeDOS on it, after making an ODIN (a one-disk distribution of FreeDOS) [dosius.com] boot floppy. I did my work on that computer, and the emulation was perfect.
Thanks to the FreeDOS project!
(Now I gotta figure out what to do with that P1... I think I almost have to install Linux on it, being a Slashdot poster and all.)
Today's dumbish question (Score:2)
1) When the idea was first thought up?
2) The first diagrams designing key features were released?
3) The first line of what was to become the OS was typed?
4) Launch date of alpha version?
5) Other?
Just a thought...
Hm. What about the GPL'd MS-DOS 7.10? (Score:2, Interesting)
I guess it depends on what you mean by "free," but MS-DOS 7.10 [yginfo.net] was released (by Microsoft, of all evil empires) under the GNU Public License.
It's about as good a DOS as you'll find--and installs much more readily (and with a bunch of neat-o options) than FreeDOS, at least in my experience.
I always stick a little 30MB partition at the beginning of the first HD on my Linux systems and install MS-DOS 7
Re:Hm. What about the GPL'd MS-DOS 7.10? (Score:2, Informative)
NTFS and USB support! (Score:3, Interesting)
Very interesting. What is the origin of MS-DOS 7.10? The web page says it has NTFS and USB support!
Re:NTFS and USB support! (Score:2, Informative)
Emulators? Not VirtualPC (Score:2)
Beta 9 would have been a nice party gift (Score:3, Informative)
USB Support? (Score:3, Funny)
ReactOS the next wave (Score:4, Interesting)
While not 1000x better, as a previous AC posted, ReactOS [reactos.com] is taking up where the FreeDOS project left off. If completed, it will replace more Windows and OS/2 systems than it's nearest free competitor.
KillDisk (Score:2, Interesting)
yet at that very moment i had the lowly task of wiping hard drives clean and was using a utility called KillDisk [killdisk.com].
i i popped it in and to my amazement FreeDOS began loading program files
Spinrite (Score:3, Interesting)
Yay for free DOS utilities! (Score:3, Informative)
Since our church uses three programs that don't run on Slackware, I had to replace it with Win 2k Professional, which is decently stable and fits our needs. Well, I had one XP boot disk that booted into Windows ME (shudder), no utilities, and no way to access two CD-ROM drives that I needed to install 2k from.
To the rescue? Nothing less than Free FDISK [23cc.com] and a Win98SE floppy [freepctech.com] with generic IDE drivers.
One MySQL client and a Win 2k installation later, and everything looks on track. Who says you don't need DOS anymore? (ahem... Microsoft...)
Thanks for another rescue, folks at FreeDOS!
The DOS Legacy (Score:3, Informative)
I have run a lot of operating systems. QNX claims to be an RTOS, Windows CE Claims to be an RTOS, neither are as responsive as DOS.
There is no stupid hour glass in DOS. Batch files make automation a piece of cake, and you don't need a degree in Computer Science to write one.
There are players for all your wonderful media types available. There are also a number of classic game emulators (Genesyst, Nesticle, etc.) available as well.
So, next time that video poker game sitting on the counter at your local bar goes kaput, just remember, it's still running DOS.... turn it off (unplug it?) and turn it back on, you'll doo the next poor drunk a big favor.
Thank you, have a nice day.
Re:The DOS Legacy (Score:3, Insightful)
Really? Where can I get the upper-bound response time datasheet? If you mean "quick and responsive" (which it darn well ought to be) then I'd agree. However, I've never heard any evidence of it being a real RTOS (which has an exact technical definition).
Re:DOS is Swedish for "DUHHHHHH" (Score:2, Informative)
Re:DOS is Swedish for "DUHHHHHH" (Score:2)
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
To run DOS applications.
If you need something really simple with little overhead, combine your app with the OS features you need.
What if the OS features I need are, in their entirity, "I need it to run this application"?
DOS isn't a good fit.
It's an excellent fit for DOS applications.
If you need DOS for application support, then by God man, start porting the mission critical DOS app...
Sure thing, as soon as you start paying me to do so.
Seriously, though. If it's not broken, why fix it? Sure, it might be fun to port all those old applications to a modern OS, but who's going to pay for it? If you have a standalone machine already doing *exactly* what you need it to do, reliably, I see no need to start messing with it.
Re:Why? (Score:3, Interesting)
I use FreeDOS to run quicken via SSH in an xterm on Linux. It works well, too!
Re:Why? (Score:2)
Let's be specific here: people are working on FreeDOS, a reimplementation of MS-DOS. As has been pointed out elsewhere on this thread, it is stable and useful but not yet a complete reimplementation, which is why people are still working on it.
Either it's broken...
"Broken" is not really the same as "still under development". A great number of perfectly stable programs are still being actively developed.
Eh? You've lost m
Re:Why? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Why? (Score:2)
huh, isn't that the point of using DOS? having the os features you need(fileaccess and whatever) but no overhead?
Re:Why? (Score:3, Informative)
That post wasn't flamebait - it's a reasonable question.
Here's one example -- Steve Gibson released a new version of his SpinRite hard disk test/recovery tool. grc.com [grc.com] It uses FreeDOS so you can boot from a floppy and test every sector.
[I haven't tried the product, just noting one relevant modern use of DOS.]
Re:Why? (Score:2)
Re:Hooray! (Score:2)
since I had stupidly expected that xp would be smart enough to pick up scsi/sata drivers from a cd and not only from a floppy...
Re:Legality of APIs (Score:4, Interesting)
Considering that the original API's were based on CP/M, I don't think M$ would have much of a leg to stand on. In addition, Seattle Computer still retained some rights to DOS after it was sold to M$. Thirdly, back in the 80's, M$ allowed a couple of the big guys to sell their own versions - most notably Compaq with version 3.31 (first DOS to support more than 32 MB per logical partition).
Re:Legality of APIs (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Legality of APIs (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Legality of APIs (Score:3, Interesting)
Well, not an API but a data structure, there apparently is for FAT, but it is under review [eweek.com].
Re:Legality of APIs (Score:2)
Re:emu (Score:4, Informative)
Re:emu (Score:2)
Re:News Flash (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Can it run Windows? (Score:2)
Re:Can it run Windows? (Score:2, Informative)
Moll.
Re:Can it run Windows? (Score:2)
Re:Can it run Windows? (Score:2)
To run old Win16 programs? Can SEAL do that?
Mmm.... I'll feed the troll! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:64 bit support (Score:3, Informative)
I wonder how freedos will deal with 64 bit CPUs. I just read that Intel's 64bit CPU will no longer support virtual x86 sessions anymore. So this means no more DOS. Will FreeDOS deal with it?
Intel IA64 chips can emulate x86, AMD64 (and Intel's clones) supports x86 natively. Unless you enter long mode, it will act as fast 16-bit/32-bit CPU.