AMD Announces New Low-End Processor Line 332
beaverbrother points out these articles at CoolTechZone
and PC Magazine, writing "AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) is slated to launch a new Sempron line of processors this summer, to compete with Intel's Celeron line. The processors are designed to perform basic tasks, such as word processing, and more advanced tasks, like playing video, with ease."
are these really cheaper to produce? (Score:3, Insightful)
so... (Score:5, Insightful)
if it's a celeron competitor that is..
hopefully it'll be at least very affordable..
Re:Sempron... (Score:5, Insightful)
I think what it implies is: (Score:5, Insightful)
What this processor is probably not aimed at is high end video encoding/transcoding - 3D (openGL or DirectX) gaming or high-load server processing.
Re:Sempron... (Score:5, Insightful)
You've gotta admit (Score:5, Insightful)
Jesus Christ, my router/firewall alone is a 333PII, which, for the average luser is WAY more than enough.
That said, I'm all for a new low-end CPU from AMD, let's me keep my overhead low and profits high. Good stuff, have some.
Why this new line? (Score:5, Insightful)
So why don't they just lower Athlon's price enough to compete with Celeron? Or is this Sempron simply a rebranded Athlon, while Duron is a crippled Ahtlon?
At first I thought AMD is introducing a dumped down 64-bit Athlon, that might be something, as the price of Athlon64 is still too expensive.
I don't get this (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Yes but... (Score:1, Insightful)
Given that, unlike AMD processors, Intel CPUs have a thermal regulator in them, I dont get the joke. I've seen Athlon chips barf their guts out across a motherboard when the heatsink fell off (plastic clip broke off in a tower), but a Celeron should just crash in that case or a P4 will just reduce its clock speed. In fact even the newer 64 bit AMD chips lack a thermal cut out on the chip, but at least (at LONG last) they have it on the motherboard.
Note to the Jihad, I am not anti AMD or pro Intel. I like and use both, I just wish that AMD would spend more time on things like this and clock locking rather then pushing for higher speeds. Both platforms are "fast enough" for now.
Re:are these really cheaper to produce? (Score:1, Insightful)
Yes because of higher yeilds and lower yeilds of highend processors. Less transistors than flagship products. More CPU's per sheet compared to flagship chips. The list goes on.
"... are they just filling in a perceived niche?"
Yes that too. AMD is not making hand over fist profits on their 64 bit chips.
ping
Re:I don't get this (Score:5, Insightful)
Looks like frys [frys-electronics-ads.com] is selling an xp2500+ with motherboard for $65 US (If you happen to live in the Dallas area which I don't). Is there a market for processors cheaper than that?
-jim
Re:You've gotta admit (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh, and newsflash for you: Joe Sixpack wants to do more on his PC nowadays than just word process and play solitaire.
Re:I think what it implies is: (Score:1, Insightful)
(I agree with you on the other two though)
Re:Yes but... (Score:1, Insightful)
You apparently don't do CAD or rendering or animation or FEA..... Processors today are far from "fast enough". People in these industries and several others will always want and need faster processors. Even when we hit something equivalent to a 10GHz processor will you not hear one of us proclaiming my computer is "too fast". I'll be able to get my job done faster, but I'll still be able to bring it to a crawl.
Re:soundalike (Score:5, Insightful)
"semper" is latin for "always", "everytime", "ever".
"durus" means "enduring", "hard".
So the name suggests this being the successor of the Duron.
Not necessarily.... (Score:3, Insightful)
All the prettiness is handled by the GPU but the CPU is still responsible for generating the OpenGL/DX stream and handling player (and other player) location, physics etc. A good example of this is UT2004 Onslaught which requires as much CPU as GPU power.
Re:fuck! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Sempron... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Sempron... (Score:3, Insightful)
I suspect most consumers really don't have a clue about processor names, and will just go for whatever a salesperson points in their direction. Any ideas as to performance probably comes more from noticing the general naffness of a name than any actual understanding. Really, which would you rather have in the absence of any other knowledge, an Athlon or a Sempron? That, of course, is precisely why low end processors get names like this
BTW, I'm under the impression Centrino is just a name for a mobile Celeron and on-board Intel WiFi NIC -- not quite a "processor family name".
Re:Sempron... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Sempron... = TAMPAX competitor (Score:3, Insightful)
A CPU called a Sempron? No wonder we're running out of trademark namespace!
Re:Sempron... (Score:4, Insightful)
I think it's weird that when a budget processor comes out, people write it off as something that's OK if all you do is email and surf the net. Those very same snobs would be slobbering to have that processor just 18 months earlier. Have their needs really changed that much in those 18 months? Do they resign themselves only to email and web surfing once their computer is 18 months old?
My point is that this thing will be cheap and screaming fast, and do everything effortlessly except for playing games that don't yet exist. Yet I'm sure that slimy salesmen at CompUSA will say that you shouldn't buy one unless what you do is just email and internet. Bah! I bet you when this comes out, it will be faster than what 90% of CompUSA employees run at home!
Re:Sempron... (Score:3, Insightful)
Not all servers need screaming fast processors, either. So, AMD's market could be even larger than just -gamer.
Re:Sempron... (Score:3, Insightful)
Absolutely not. We buy a new CPU and graphics card long before those 18 months have passed.
Now if only ATI would get off their asses and actually bring the X800 XT Platinum Edition to the market, I wouldn't have to make do with this 7 month old 9800 XT. Lemme tell you, this thing _crawls_ in 1600x1200x32 with 6x FSAA and 16x Aniso in some games. Not "games which don't even exxist", but actual games available here and now. It sometimes even dips lower than 60 fps
And don't even get me started on AMD's 939 pin socket. They've been talking and talking about it for months. Why can't I buy a 939 pin CPU and mobo already? I already have the paired Crucial RAM and Zalman copper heatsink for it. Geesh, I mean, this socket 754 AMD 64 3200+ is, what? Almost 8 months old
Well, sort of "ha ha, only serious." I _will_ buy a new A64 and an X800 XT, but I'm not really _that_ angry and impatient as the above paragraphs sound. I can wait another month, if needed
Does it make economic sense? Absolutely not. Is it what 90% of the PC market is all about? Absolutely not. Is it stupid? Absolutely.
But, hey, it doesn't make it any less real.
You're wrong. (Score:3, Insightful)
This is not to diss AMD, I'm sure the Sempron will kill the celeron, and likely compete with the p4 on an even clock speed, but the big manufacturers will treat it like a Cyrix (They see: P4, Athlon, Celeron, then Sempron). I cannot feel strongly enough about my friends who go out and buy a "cheap" celeron for $500. Just imagine all the people who would sell them their 3 year old gaming system, a system to totally blow away the modern "Screaming fast" PC.
Re:Sempron... (Score:3, Insightful)
I just finished swapping out 3 dual P3 Xeon machines that were running 4 websites and e-mail for 6 domains with an Athlon XP-M (yes, the mobile version) 2400+ with a PowerNow compliant chipset. Not only is it sufficient, but since it's still not under heavy load it spends most of the time at 800mhz, and total power usage is down from 620 watts to 130 watts. The whole system was less than $500 (not including the SCSI adapter and DLT drive I scavenged from the other servers).
I'm the sysadmin for one company that is running their corporate network (file, mail and web servers) off a pair of Duron 700s. Their 100Mb network and 1.5Mb net connection are more of a bottleneck than the CPUs.
Low end processors exceeded the performance requirements for the majority of servers years ago. It's really unfortunate that the prevailing attitude that servers need to be powerful causes people to waste money on the latest and greatest CPUs when it could be better spent on faster storage, or something else entirely.