80,012 Text Messages In One Month 328
webguru4god writes "According to an article on AZCentral.com, a man in New Zealand sent an average of 2,580 text messages a day for a whole month to protest his cell phone provider cancelling their unlimited text messaging plan. I recently received a faulty cell phone bill for $2000 claiming that I sent 40,000 text messages in one month, which I thought was physically impossible. But apparently this man has doubled that number and managed to get 8 hours of sleep each night for the month!"
hhmmm... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:hhmmm... (Score:2, Funny)
New Zealand (Score:4, Funny)
Here on 'old' Zealand we just have freaks of society...
Re:New Zealand (Score:3, Funny)
Re:hhmmm... (Score:5, Interesting)
During the promotion people in the same room have been texting back and forth to each other about the program they've been watching, so the numbers added up. His protest was in texting the competitor service it was costing Telecom a lot more than Telecom to Telecom texts.
Re:hhmmm... (Score:5, Informative)
The two main phone networks in NZ are Vodafone and Telecom. Vodafone initially dominated the texting market, with 20c-per-text prices using its GSM network. In order to reclaim some marketshare, Telecom introduced its "$10-per-month for unlimited texting deal" last year, and advertised it nationwide.
Here's the kicker. Telecom's network is based on CDMA, and to switch from Vodafone to Telecom you have to purchase a new phone and get a new phone number. Lots of people I know were spending hundreds of dollars a month on text charges with Vodafone, so justifying the expense of ~$300NZD for a midrange Telecom phone and switching over made sense economically.
During this period, I don't recall Telecom mentioning any time limit on the deal whatsoever. Anyone who paid more attention than I to the extremely small print at the bottom of their TV screens can feel free to post a rebuttal, but many people received an assurance from Telecom store clerks in person that the $10 deal was guaranteed for a long time (years to decades) and correspondingly switched over to the Telecom network, expecting their initial outlay for a new phone to eventually pay for itself.
Fast forward to 2004, and Telecom pulls the bait and switch on its subscribers, causing a lot of them to get very angry and send as many text messages as they could before the $10 deal terminated as a protest.
I can see where Telecom is coming from, as they do pay interconnect agreements with Vodafone and have to pay approximately 8c to 14c (can't recall the exact figure) per text message that terminates on Vodafone's network, and as such the $10 deal is uneconomic in the long term. And they do still have a monthly deal, but it's capped at ~500 messages last I heard, which is less than many people require (especially when forwarding one message to several people; it adds up rapidly!). However, I still feel that Telecom's behaviour with regards to advertising their phone deal was a little unethical, and I can see exactly where the person in the article is coming from...
Re:hhmmm... (Score:5, Informative)
Now when Telecom announced their $10/month for unlimited text almost everyone I knew could see into the (near) future that Telecom was going to pull the old "bait and switch" with this whole deal.
I would constantly put the sales reps that accosted me at my University on the spot by asking in a loud voice when the deal will end. They said "indefinate" while umming and ahhhing which then I would say "So, you could change it next month, right?".
Now while this "unlimited" texting went on, people started to wonder how Telecom could afford this kind of madness, but Telecom in New Zealand controls a huge majority of Phone lines, toll calls, ADSL connections and controls one of the largest ISP's in NZ (Xtra). We knew where they were getting their money from they were subsidising their losses in the cell phone division from their other (more profitable) departments.
So as more and more people started to poke their nose into Telecom's business, we knew their next move was coming next. $10/month for 500 texts. Now the deal is still a huge savings in money, but it's just the fact that Telecom changed the rules while the game was being played and that upset a lot of people.
Vodafone cannot compete with those prices, so Vodafone chose to start pushing their interactive GPRS technologies such as Vodafone Live! (neat wap portal) and PXT (picture messages). Now even though I could save $50/month I simply do not trust telecom! I'm an account holder with Vodafone (not prepay) and I just will not deal with Telecom more than I have to, lest they choose to rip me off.
Re:hhmmm... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:hhmmm... (Score:5, Informative)
The voice mobile service in NZ is more expensive than most developed country. Here links to the most generous [vodafone.co.nz] plan from Vodafone that is the major rival against Telecom. It is something like NZD$40 (about US$25) for 300 min of offpeak min. $1/min on peak hours... Forget about the daytime plans... They are 5 times more expansive. Since voice service is so expensive, most secondary and university students rely on text message for communication... Many of them are on prepaid as they cannot afford the monthly fee.
Here comes to the point: many of them found $40 expensive, do they have the few hundred buck for texting? Students in general don't earn much. Some university students receive allowance from the government at a rate of $500/month. Accomodation can easily be more than that...
IMO, the current chaos is created by the "all you can eat" mentality. I know many secondary students start sending bulk forward messages, joke etc... Before then, texting was for something more crucial like "I got stuck in the traffic", "Let's meet at xyz 7pm tonite"... It really catches Telecom off guard... We cannot exclude the possiblity that some of the texting records are broken with the aid of computers.
Telecom is the bully in the local telco market... But, in this event, I don't blame them for cutting the $10 unlimited texting deal... It is clear since the first day that the $10 deal is a limited promotion with time limit...
Re:hhmmm... (Score:5, Insightful)
Which is wrong... exactly why?
Anyone offering flat rate, unlimited-for-fixed-price (all you can eat) takes on a risk. This is obvious for anyone with basic understanding of economy. The same happened with unlimited internet access - marketing made assumptions about usage patterns that turned out wrong.
However in this case it may be simpler, as it seems somewhat to be bait and switch thing. Honest limited time offers say they are limited.
Re:hhmmm... (Score:3, Funny)
They probably think they have hit a gold mine after the bill they will send him.
Re:hhmmm... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:hhmmm... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:hhmmm... (Score:5, Informative)
I just don't get cells (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I just don't get cells (Score:2, Informative)
That may be the case over there, but over here local calls are charged per minute.
I like cell phones because they allow me to make/take calls anywhere anytime instead of being tied to a landline. If I don't want to be disturbed I can switch on the silent mode. If someone has something important to tell me while I'm in the movies, for instance, he/she can leave a message. With the caller ID (no extra charge) I can also screen my calls. Having a cell ph
Re:I just don't get cells (Score:5, Insightful)
My landline phone only remembers the last number I dialed. My cell phone remembers the last 10, and has 200 more in the address book. (I can also store numbers on my landline phone, but I can't attach names to them, so I'd have to make a separate record of what number is which person... too much hassle.)
So there's lots of times when it's easier for me to pick up my cell phone to make a call, even when I'm home.
you have unlimited calls to all your friends in your area code,
I live in Los Angeles. About three of my friends are in my area code. The city itself has four different area codes.
Granted, many of those are still not toll charges, but some of them are, and I can't tell by the area code which will be. My friend in Van Nuys (818) is local, but my friend in Reseda (also 818) is a toll call.
and you can sit and chat with them all day like it is nothing if you want, because it isn't going to cost you a dime more or less todo so.
While with my cell phone, I can do the same to my friend in San Jose or my mom when she's out of town in Detroit or Nigeria, and have the same experience... because it's a very, very rare occurence for me to go over my monthly minutes.
With a cellphone, you have all these funky plans, unneeded features, and hidden costs.
My cell phone bill is the same each month, within a few cents. My landline varies more.
I have no "unneeded features." I get a package that includes the features I want and will use. I don't want text messaging, so my package doesn't include it. I do want unlimited long distance, so my package gives me that.
A second landline can be had for $15/mo, so you can have two numbers, one for you, and one for the kids.
I can add a second line to my cell phone for $9.99/month. Oh, and, that $15/month doesn't include about $5/month in taxes, surcharges, and fees you'll be paying. (Same is true of the cell phone, but since many are a percentage of what you pay, it's even cheaper by comparison.)
All for about $35/mo, and you don't have to worry about "going over". If you have family in another state, just get a calling card, or get a good long distance plan.
Or, get a good cell phone plan for about $40/month, and pay nothing extra for long distance or "local toll" at all.
We cancelled long distance service on our landline, because AT&T started charging us $6/month even when we didn't use it. We never use it, because it's free from our cell phones.
So, it sounds like you're woefully underinformed about cellular service, and you're paying for your ignorance. Good on you.
Re:I just don't get cells (Score:3, Interesting)
I do have both a personal landline and cell phone. The cell phone stays off unless I must make a call. The landline doesn't get answered unless I'm expecting a call or the caller-id is someone I want to talk to.
I hold a similar philosophy about instant messengers. I
no thumbs needed (Score:2)
i bet my friends sometime wonder how i can reply with texts with elaborate grammar seconds after they text me...
Re:hhmmm... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:hhmmm... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:hhmmm... (Score:2)
1. Phone with bluetooth support
2. Mac OSX
3. AppleScript knowledge
And flood the airwaves.
were the messages spam? (Score:5, Funny)
owch (Score:2)
I think that would make me cry... alot.
You know... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:You know... (Score:5, Insightful)
Comcast, anybody?
Re:You know... (Score:5, Interesting)
-
Re:You know... (Score:4, Interesting)
We're talking SMS messaging here. When you can get phones with internet access and support for msn / yahoo / aim-icq you tend to expect it's all covered in your monthly fee, because it is. Unless you would have me believe it's more costly to offer SMS messaging rather then yahoo over mobile.
10,000 text messages a day is nothing like 20gig a day on an ISP. assuming your average message is 128 bytes this is 1.25MB a day. At 110 baud a reasonable typing speed this would be all day. At 2400 baud that's like an hour of use, at phone speeds this is squat. 20gigs a day on an ISP for your average joe cable user would be all day use. Filling up a hard drive in a matter of days is excessive, but typing speeds are not likely to max out network speeds that are measured in KB/sec.
Re:You know... (Score:4, Informative)
Its not like that internet backbone monopoly Ameriaca has over the rest of the world where all ISPs share there bandwidth for next to noting.
each one of those SMSs could of cost the phonecompany 5-10cents..
Not that im saying the company didnt deserve it,
unlimited is after all, unlimited..
Re:You know... (Score:2, Insightful)
Some ISPs consider "unlimited" to be "within a reasonable frame" and I don't buy that either. Don't advertise what you're not planning on providing. Otherwise it's just lies. Many people seem to think that takin
Re:You know... (Score:5, Insightful)
Agreed. If the company providing the service could truly offer "unlimited" service (can't even think of any examples, but I'm sure they exist) then it's fine. In most cases, however, "unlimited" simply doesn't fly, and you'll find (especially in the web hosting/ISP business) deep in the AUP/TOS something like "...unless you use more than x in one month...", eg, "unlimited as long as you stay within the limites".
I can't see that text messages could possibly cost that much to process (my provider (Cingular), where I do not have text messaging as part of my plan, charges 10 cents per message). It's simple ASCII text, generally very short, and has to use far less bandwidth than a phone conversaion. Yet, a phone conversation to the very same person you're text messaging with would be a lot cheaper (or pretty much free)... I think they're charging crazy fees simply because it's a new fad, and they can...
Re:You know... (Score:5, Interesting)
Unlimited is a marketing ploy, nothing more and nothing less.
Point in case, a DSL provider in Germany offers a no-transfer-limit DSL account. I have just read that they regularly (every month or so) identify those users who pull more than 20GB per month, and send them a polite letter, offering them 100 Euros (100-something US$), if they terminate their account at once. Moreover, they can keep the DSL router and other hardware they got for free when signing up. Basically, they're saying, we don't want you, here's some cash if you leave right away (and sign a statement that you won't re-apply for their service if you keep up your downloading habits).
Re:You know... (Score:5, Interesting)
Yeah, and it's always good to have your customers uneasy about using your service.
When I owned an R/C track I offered unlimited practice for three bucks a driver a day. I told people flat out that they could show up at opening with the wife and kiddies bearing a picnic basket and stay until closing for their three bucks.
And some people did, and it was a real pain in the ass because I wasn't the sort to just take their money and sit behind the counter ignoring them all day. I considered my customers my guests and treated them as such, making sure music they liked was playing, the sort of racing tapes they liked were on the TV, helped them set up their cars and even played with their kids so that they'd be free to play with their cars.
That's a lot of work for three bucks.
But I didn't consider these people as abusing my policy. I set my policy. My policy was my policy.
And I had a lot of happy customers who loved coming to my place and hanging out, who felt free to just pop in for a few minutes or a few hours. Who never felt they had to carefully schedule their visits so they came more often.
So I had more customers overall, because they were all happy.
KFG
The real question is... (Score:5, Insightful)
Little over a year ago, there was an MMS war between the telcos here in Norway and all MMS messages were free of charge. The price war continued for half a year and I save a lot on using MMS to send text instead of SMS.
wait a minute (Score:3, Funny)
It's possible (Score:5, Informative)
And with sites like CellularOneWest [cellularonewest.com] you can send up to 12 at a time.
Re:It's possible (Score:2, Informative)
I really doubt he was manually sending them. There are very easy ways to send those messages with a regular Nokia and a dedicated cable for the PC. Software like Oxygen [oxygensoftware.com] would do the rest for you.
Now, for the really professional way, get on of these babys [wavecom.com]. Basically a stripped GSM phone with great communication capabilities. You can get about 1 SMS each 2 seconds sent all right.
Costs outweigh the advantages (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Costs outweigh the advantages (Score:3, Informative)
Actually the story is inaccurate - the text caps only came into action a few days ago. The guy actually spent the last month of the "all you can text" promotion to send his 80,000 texts and therefore was only out of pocket by NZ$10.
Re:Costs outweigh the advantages (Score:3, Informative)
Hate to be the grammar Nazi here, but the story is not inaccurate -- "would have spent" is the third conditional [englishclub.com], which refers to "a condition in the past that did not happen.". So it's not saying he spent the money, it's saying that if he had NOT been on the unlimited plan, he would have spent it.
Re:Costs outweigh the advantages (Score:2)
Paying money for surgery? What the hell kind of 3rd world nation do you live in?
Cell Provider Targeting Spam (Score:5, Interesting)
According to the article, some users were sending 100,000 messages per month. This is the equivalent of 3,333 messages per day. There doesn't seem to be much in the way of legitimate uses for this many messages except for commercial dispatch (for example) but in those instances, those companies should be expected to pay. I mean, as a messaging user, I sure don't want to subsidize a dispatch company for their commercial usage of the feature.
Perhaps the limit is a little too low but I personally don't see many people using an average of more than 33 messages per day. Note this is average and not, for example, one bad day with the server going up and down all the time.
Re:Cell Provider Targeting Spam (Score:3, Insightful)
Sure, you might say that I'm abusing the system, but hey, I signed up for unlimited text messages, so that's what I expected to get. If they didn't want it to b
Re:Cell Provider Targeting Spam (Score:2, Informative)
As for Rogers cable as an ISP... if you have a freaking cap then tell your users!
Re:Cell Provider Targeting Spam (Score:2, Interesting)
Of course what with Telecom being the devil incarnate (have somehow managed to prevent the unbundling of the local loop, which means, amongst other things, they have a monopoly over DSL, the major broadband option in New Zealand) one
Re:Cell Provider Targeting Spam (Score:3, Funny)
(Apart from their money-sucking pairing deals... bastards).
Re:Cell Provider Targeting Spam (Score:3, Informative)
In order for people to send an SMS from the Telecom to Vodafone network (BTW, these are the ONLY two mobile networks in this country), Telecom has to pay Vodafone $0.13, per SMS.
When you're only charging your customers $10 a month for a potentially unlimited stream of messages to another network, it only takes 77 before you break-even.
Given the popularity of SMS in this country, I'd say that most customers who went for this deal were doing a shit-load more than that.
It's crazy (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:It's crazy (Score:2)
What cost? Well, almost none, but in North America they can get away with it. I pay a couple dollars a month to get a bundle o fa few hundred messages. That's a better way of handling it, IMO.
For your information (Score:3, Informative)
2) Almost all providers charge a "termination cost" per message entering their network (UK providers charge 3p per terminated message). Unlimited deals rely on the fact that most text messages generate a response, thus bringing that revenue back.
Re:For your information (Score:3, Interesting)
It was newer mean to be an instant-messaging protocol. SMS is built on top of the simple debugging messages that the GSM standard allows. Some engineers at Nokia started playing around with the idea and didn't bother to design a real solution.
Re:It's crazy (Score:2)
If the expensive overwhelmed the convenience then you'd see people calling (only 5c a minute after all) rather than txting.
It's a scam in most places. (Score:2)
If it's 40 characters on average that's only 3MB.
How much are most telco's charging for SMS?
Talk about profiteering.
Compare with 9600bps voice = about 70KB/minute. 170 minutes of talk time = 12MB.
42 minutes of talk time = 3MB.
(OK not full duplex - but hey they don't have to transmit silent pauses - and I'm not even sure they always support full duplex voice).
Futhermore text messages can be delayed by the telco till whe
Price around here (Score:2)
But it is not really the price that matters. I send an SMS if the message is not important enough to interrupt the other person for.
Re:It's crazy (Score:5, Informative)
Re:It's crazy (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:It's crazy (Score:2)
Re:It's crazy (Score:2, Informative)
What a rate! (Score:2)
OMG (Score:3, Funny)
It's not that hard... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:It's not that hard... (Score:2, Informative)
yeah that was what I was thinking too...
Okay, that's a lot of messages when looking at it, but reading the article, he sent the same message over and over again.
On my Sony-Ericsson T68i, I can save a message as some kind of draft so I don't have to retype it, and I can send it to several people in one go (kinda like sending a carbon copy e-mail)
Just go to: messages > SMS > Templates.
Not to rain on his parade, because the number in itself is still impressive, but it's not like he typed 80k-odd
Re:It's not that hard... (Score:4, Interesting)
It's not said in that short article, but I'm pretty sure it's the same guy that I read about a week or so ago. And he was sending the bulk of the SMS's to a spare SIM card that he had, so that he wouldn't annoy all his friends. Small mercies I suppose.
Text messaging was free at the beginning (Score:3, Informative)
At that time, some phones were even only capable off recieving them (or just resetted if you sent "large" SMS with 160 chars).
So try to calculate how much 1 MB of transfer it costs with texting. GPRS is a little bit cheaper (at least in Europe) and UMTS will cut some costs as well. Problem is that you can not send direct messages as all the data connections get private IPs within their networks (and they firewall a bit)
Ridiculous! (Score:5, Informative)
Speaking as a New Zealander, I find it ridiculous that anyone could believe that Telecom's "$10 Text" promotion would last for several more years. When the promotion began, it was very clearly advertised that the promotion would only extend to the end of 2003. I think that Telecom's customers have been lucky that they have extended the promotion for an extra 6 months.
To put it quite simply: Telecom New Zealand advertised it as a time-limited promotion. People who believe that it should continue indefinitely are confused, and believe that they should get something for nothing.
I can empathize (Score:2, Interesting)
Connect it to your comuputer (Score:2, Redundant)
http://www.isis.de/~s.frings/smstools_index.html [www.isis.de]
Price of SMS Stinks. (Score:5, Informative)
Considering how little data is traversed to wager the cost, I can't see how its anywhere near reasonable.
Our postal service will physically send a letter to anywhere in Australia for 40c - which requires much more signficant investment in resources. And yet somehow telcos feel they can charge -that- much.
Whenever I can, I prefer to pick up the mobile to call somebody, if you stay on the phone for no longer than 30 seconds its about the same cost. And the call is calcuated per second airtime.
What do other countries such as Asia, Europe and America pay?
Tell us!
Re:Price of SMS Stinks. (Score:2)
We have all number of text bundles, the first of which was O2's unlimited offering which then changed to a limited offering. These days, the text bundles mean you pay for a certain number of texts, ie 5 for 100, or pay per message sent.
What to consider in terms of cost, at least in the UK, is the networks charge 3p to other networks to receive text messages.
Re:Price of SMS Stinks. (Score:2)
Re:Price of SMS Stinks. (Score:2)
You are right that the cost of and SMS in the network is practically zero. But there are two other factors detemining the price:
Re:Price of SMS Stinks. (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm spanish, but I'm living in Tokyo.
I don't know about other asian countries, but at least here in Japan nobody uses SMS. Instead, we use email.
Each phone has a default email address associated to it (usually something like @phonecompany.tld), and you can change this email address whenever you want. Many people choose really hard-to-guess addresses to avoid spam. And yes, this is "normal" email, reachable from the Internet. For example, my server monitoring scripts can notify my phone [ag0ny.com] of a problem by just doing a "cat $MESSAGE | mail @docomo.ne.jp".
The prices depend on the company and the type of contract. In DoCoMo phones using i-mode, one packet of data is 128 bytes. Each monthly plan includes 400 free packets. After these free packets, the next 10000 packets are billed at 0.3 yen each, and each additional packet after these 10000 is billed at 0.2 yen each. (source here [nttdocomo.co.jp]).
An email message on these phones can be up to 512 characters long, so including the overhead, the maximum you will pay for a single message will be 4.5 yen.
At today's rate, 1 Japanese Yen = 0.009004 US Dollar.
Re:Price of SMS Stinks. (Score:2, Interesting)
The cost to send the messages is on the order of a thousand of a cent. The rest is all nice profit or intercarrier fees.
If you send a lot of messages, you can buy a microcell for about US$6000 new ($1000 used) and relay them yourself. Of course someone might get a bit annoyed if you used a frequency you don't have the rights too but that migth not too expensive to buy for a small area.
The reason why Telecom put the cap on (Score:5, Informative)
For 100,000 messages that accounts to NZ$8000 per month. The Telecom deal was $10 per month so they would lose $7990 per month for a customer that texted that much to Vodafone!!
Telecom didn't think this out before they offered the deal, have lost shitloads of money, and are now backtracking furiously and blaming "spammers".
Are you sure? (Score:2)
From the copy of the NISC (Network Interconnection Service Contract) I have:
Subject to clauses 4.2 to 4.4, the price of the Text Message Service to be provided under this Agreement, and which the Originating Party agrees to pay, is 14.0 cents for each Chargeable Text Message.
From the Voice NISC:
Chargeable Call Rate: Peak - 2.9c Off Peak 0.
I don't get it (Score:4, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Some friend! (Score:5, Funny)
2,580 times a day he did this. I am guessing he is now short a few friends...
Maybe he made new ones (Score:3, Funny)
Radiation (Score:2, Funny)
Um (Score:2, Funny)
(Then again he could have an amazingly active social life with that many texts!)
Should be pretty easy to achieve with a terminal (Score:2, Interesting)
Practicality? (Score:4, Interesting)
3 messages per minute (Score:5, Interesting)
I have clients who run SMS gateway machines, and each phone can send 30 to 50 messages per minute. Of course, this is computer controlled, and they have a chassis with 30 phones and hundreds of SIM cards to spread the charge across many "1000 free texts per month" plans.
Back when SMS messaging was free in Europe, I wrote a crude implementation of IP over SMS. The phones were connected with serial cables to linux boxes. It took some serious tweaking of MTU, TCP timeouts, and a couple of hacked applications (sendmail and telnet) to deal with the bandwidth, latency and small packet size problems. I even managed to perform an NFS mount over SMS. But alas, once the phone companies smelled money, it was all over.
the AC
Uhm... (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't feel sorry for him that he can't continue to send a text message every 20 seconds. If it was me he was sending his "hi, how are you" drivel to, my response would probably be something in the line of "Shut the f*ck up dude"
Messaging Abuse? (Score:4, Interesting)
So lets see. The provider recognizes that people are abusing the system. The guy sends thousands of pages to his friends to prove people are abusing the system, and he makes the news as being the good guy because telco's are evil??
If someone started sending *ME* thousands of messages per month, I'd get a bit irate. I suppose his friends aren't exactly happy with a month of their phone beeping at them constantly. I get a bit pissed at just our server pages (sent to my phone), and those don't count up anywhere near thousands per month.
maximum texts a month (Score:2, Informative)
1000/30 = 33 texts a day. For personal use, is it enough? Most people I know don't come near that many.
Re:maximum texts a month (Score:2, Interesting)
Based on what I see on the days that I have to take the train to work, here in Tokyo I'd say 33/day is nowhere near enough. People are messaging all the time; to see a young lady do five or six messages in the 20 minutes that it takes me to get to Shinjuku is not at all uncommon.
I on the other hand have sent about 30, at the most, in the last year.
For a second there (Score:2)
AT+CMGS (Score:2)
The specs to which GSM phones are implemented list a number of AT commands to allow you to send an SMS among other things. With a bit of scripting, it should be easy to automate the sending of SMS's repeatedly, should you want to!
Info here [cellular.co.za].
Howto send large amount... (Score:3, Informative)
1. Take your phone. Make a distribution-list which includes everyone on your phone capable to recive textmessages. (say 100 people)
2. Write a large sms. As you might know, one sms can contain 160 chars. So when you type a sms over 160 chars, it will be seen as two sms. Write one big sms (that really count as four).
3. Send this one to the distribution list: You have know sent 400 sms in just a few minutes.
4. To be sure they all got it, resend it!
5. Reply to everyone that answers, and resend again to they who don't anser!
It might just take you three minutes to send almost 1000 smses. Good luck!
Big Phone Bills (Score:3, Insightful)
He's probably still paying it off...
Article with interview (Score:4, Insightful)
Following is a link to an article in New Zealand's major daily on the company itself - may they rot in hell. Anti-competitive personified.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID =3570468
Sweet Revenge!!! (Score:5, Funny)
I was obviously pissed as I knew she was going somewhere, and suspected it would be with her 'boyfriend' so I paged her, but she never returned my call.
What I did then was setup Telex (BBS Software) on my PC to dial her pager number, wait for 2 seconds, then enter my cell phone number and hang up, repeated ad infinum. It took a total of 8 seconds for each paging cycle. I knew she was leaving pager range but what did I care.
I was sending out 450 pages per hour, starting on a Friday afternoon. I stopped paging once she returned to town that Monday. I paged her no fewer than 32,400 times that weekend. What I did was a denial of service attack on her pager where she was charged 10 cents for each page over 1000 per month.
My satisfaction grew once I heard that she received a $3,200 pager bill for that month, which she never paid and I'm sure is still on her credit report.
Re:Sweet Revenge!!! (Score:4, Insightful)
I can't imagine why your wife would rather be with another man than with you. You sound like a total dreamboat.
Putting myself in her position, it might have been worth the $3,200 to receive absolute assurance that she was making the right decision.
Posted anonymously, lest you decide to take revenge against me too.
rofl (Score:3, Insightful)
80,012 Text Messages In One Month (Score:4, Funny)
I thimk you mispelled the word, "spam".
Sue sue sue sue sue! (Score:3, Interesting)
Look at the details of the plan that they advertise. [telecom.co.nz]
Text Messaging $0.20 - But you'll pay no more than $10 a month
There is no fine print. There is nothing to lead me to believe that I cannot send 100,000 text messages for $10.
--
Why won't they cap the accounts? (Score:3, Informative)
When I got a cell phone recently I was asked for some very personal info such as social security number, drivers license number, date of birth. When I asked why they claimed it was so they could "find" me if I charged up a big phone bill and then refused to pay. I didn't think they needed to start a dossier on me so I asked several of these phone service providers if I could get my account capped at some low amount. I even offered to leave a deposit for this amount. They said they won't do that. I am still mystified as to why. Credit card companies will do it. They will even question charges that appear fraudulent. But a telecomm company won't?
I ended up getting one of them to agree to remove my social security number from there computer file by zeroing it out after performing a credit check. I suspect it is still in their computer though. Does anyone know why a phone company would actually need your most personal information?
Re:money lost (Score:2)
Actually I think this guy wasn't losing any money... RTFA...