Disney Licenses MS Windows Media DRM 385
securitas writes "CNet/ZDNet reports that Walt Disney has licensed Microsoft's Windows Media DRM technology for use in online movie distribution via the Internet. Reuters reports that Disney plans to sell movies online in late 2004 or early 2005, while AP reports that the multi-year license for Microsoft's digital rights/restrictions management and copy-protection software will let Disney distribute content on mobile phones, PDAs and portable media players (mirror). The companies are expected to officially announce the deal later today (Monday)." Conspiracy theorists, start your engines; kidding aside, this is something to watch, as these are two titans of industry.
Re:Titans yes, monopolies no. (Score:5, Informative)
If you think that Microsoft, Disney, or most other large corporations have not violated the sherman [stolaf.edu] Antitrust Act of 1890, you should probably read it. The word 'monopoly' has been bandied around specifically to confuse the issue. Section 2:
"Attempt to monopolize" etc. Section 1 discusses restraint of trade - which this could most certainly be percieved as a step towards, dependin g on how Microsoft and Disney deal with the DRM issues - and with their track record, it's not looking good.
Creating a barrier to entry is what the industry is trying to accomplish with mandatory DRM. If you have to pay a $50 license for DRM, and it's illegal to distribute something (software, os, hardware, or all three) without it, then the Free Software world - and, perhaps, open source - is essentially relegated to irrelevance here in the US. And in any country that would hope to do business with US and the IMF/Wold Bank. Bleah.
More Disney/Pixar after Cars? (Score:2, Informative)
Pixar still has three movies it owes Disney.
Two now that Finding Nemo is done[1]. Or does the contract specify that Pixar owes Disney something beyond The Incredibles and Cars?
How long do you think it would take Disney to setup a Pixar knock-off?
Knockoff? Not long at all. Division whose movies survive for a strong second weekend? Not while Eisner remains in power.
[1] "Done" as in "dinner's ready" [losingnemo.com].
Re:Turn on PBS instead of the Eisner Channel (Score:3, Informative)
Re:and this will help disney? (Score:5, Informative)
I don't think the question is setting up a Pixar knock off. If Disney wanted a fully 3d animation studio I'm sure Eisner could put it on his personal platinum card and have it bought this afternoon. So let's say they do that, what then? The problem is that Disney almost never produces any original ideas. Most of their work has been adaptation of existing stories. Outside of their distribution agreements with Ghibli and Pixar(oops), There aren't manny original stories that they can claim. Oh, and before you tell me that the Lion King or Disney's take on Atlantis were original, you had better check here [indiana.edu] and here [animenewsnetwork.com].
Re:and this will help disney? (Score:3, Informative)
Like PDI/Dreamworks? A looong time.
Creating a reasonable facimile of the technology to generate these kinds of pictures? Probably not too long?
Assebmling an organization with the talent needed to produce films on par with Monsters, Nemo, Shrek, Ice Age, etc? That's a different question. That seems to be the area where they can't deliver anymore, innit?
Once upon a time, they had ppl that could develop stories and characters that made films like Lion King, Beauty & Beast, Aladdin, etc the successes that they were. Then something happened. Disney started making crap like Atlantis, Treasure Planet, etc. No amount of mind-blowing animation technology can make up for a basic lack of entertaining story and characters.
Pixar makes some beautiful movies, to be sure. These movies would not be nearly as successful without the Woody's, Buzz's, Mike's, Sully's, Marlin's and Dory's
Re:Not Important (Score:5, Informative)
The point is, back in 1984, when Disney almost ceased being Disney, they had theme parks and the merchandising, and that would have done was provide the corporate raiders with more pieces to break off after buying the company. Unless Disney can continue producing more properties for its library and for the distribution channels that it paid so much money for (cable and ABC) its future growth is in question. Look at MGM as an example of where Disney does not want to end up - anemic, and perpetually on the auction block.
Re:Monopolies, yes (Score:1, Informative)
If I so chose, I could do everything I wanted to do right now without using Microsoft products. I could install any decent Linux distro for simple day-to-day tasks, and if I really wanted to do creative work, there's always Apple. One of these options is cheaper than Microsoft, and the other is generally considered easier to use. And the both of them are causing so much of a dent in Microsoft's wallet that this is the first year MS has reported no profit increase. Doesn't sound to me like Microsoft has much of a hold on anything.
You put a lot of stock in the decision of a single judge on a lower court. How about you think for yourself rather than letting the government do it for you, hm?
MS Press Release (Score:4, Informative)
Re:copied or played (Score:2, Informative)
Nonexclusive (Score:1, Informative)