You fucking LIED. What's the deal with people, usually politicians, claiming they misspoke? WTF is even misspoke? Just say you fucking lied. "I lied. Deal with it."
well, lying implies intent to deceive while misspoke is I just said the wrong thing, so no intent to deceive.
Me, I would ask, if he left Alphabet/Google 5 years ago, then how does he know this/where did he get the data to make that assessment? and honestly, with all the products that have been successful, then canned by Google, I don't think WFH killed them, I think rather PHB's killed them.
For a majority of positions, WFH results in lower productivity and worse outcomes. Anyone honest in the industry will tell you this. It comes down to how you communicate with others; in person communication is far superior to any digital methods, and without effective communication your output will suffer.
So who is he afraid of offending? Any current employees that would cause issues over his position deserve to find employment elsewhere.
I used to think the same. But his statement can't be broadly applied.
For certain technical jobs, WFH can be superior - for example: I can have my own space and quietness. I can engage in a meeting with a technical peer and review code or designs through a screen share, and have a copy of the work shared electronically. Contrast that to walking over to a colleagues desk and looking over his/her shoulder and having to remember what we discussed or wait for a copy to be sent to me by the time I get back to
He's obviously overpaid ;)
You fucking LIED. What's the deal with people, usually politicians, claiming they misspoke? WTF is even misspoke? Just say you fucking lied. "I lied. Deal with it."
misspoke := he spoke his mind while he should not have, ie said something out of line
Me, I would ask, if he left Alphabet/Google 5 years ago, then how does he know this/where did he get the data to make that assessment? and honestly, with all the products that have been successful, then canned by Google, I don't think WFH killed them, I think rather PHB's killed them.
For a majority of positions, WFH results in lower productivity and worse outcomes. Anyone honest in the industry will tell you this. It comes down to how you communicate with others; in person communication is far superior to any digital methods, and without effective communication your output will suffer.
So who is he afraid of offending? Any current employees that would cause issues over his position deserve to find employment elsewhere.
I used to think the same. But his statement can't be broadly applied. For certain technical jobs, WFH can be superior - for example: I can have my own space and quietness. I can engage in a meeting with a technical peer and review code or designs through a screen share, and have a copy of the work shared electronically. Contrast that to walking over to a colleagues desk and looking over his/her shoulder and having to remember what we discussed or wait for a copy to be sent to me by the time I get back to