Our client is acting like a criminal but if we say that, we lose a customer. Worse, they bribe politicians to legitimize their dishonesty: Dammed if we do, Dammed if we don't.
which is probably reasonable for a hyper-scaler deployment a company like Meta would consider. Most of the hardware is pretty reliable. Everything running on it will be highly fault tolerant. If anything goes wrong nobody local does any actual fix, they pull replacement unit out of stock, swap it, and it boots from SAN and rejoins the hive..
The failed unit is either shipped to some central recovery facility or maybe directly the recycler.
This is what state and local pols NEED to understand about these data
From the eye-in-the-sky view of this, it looks like Meta knows there's a pretty big risk of either low or no return on investment with this new datacenter. They want it built, but they don't know that the whole purpose for it won't blow-up or disappear in the time it takes to be built. Therefore, they want a holding company to own the majority share of the datacenter, so if it ends up being a financial blunder, they only take 20% of the blame, rather than 100%. It looks from here like a typical corporate st
Our client is acting like a criminal but if we say that, we lose a customer. Worse, they bribe politicians to legitimize their dishonesty: Dammed if we do, Dammed if we don't.
https://seekingalpha.com/news/... [seekingalpha.com]
which is probably reasonable for a hyper-scaler deployment a company like Meta would consider. Most of the hardware is pretty reliable. Everything running on it will be highly fault tolerant. If anything goes wrong nobody local does any actual fix, they pull replacement unit out of stock, swap it, and it boots from SAN and rejoins the hive..
The failed unit is either shipped to some central recovery facility or maybe directly the recycler.
This is what state and local pols NEED to understand about these data
From the eye-in-the-sky view of this, it looks like Meta knows there's a pretty big risk of either low or no return on investment with this new datacenter. They want it built, but they don't know that the whole purpose for it won't blow-up or disappear in the time it takes to be built. Therefore, they want a holding company to own the majority share of the datacenter, so if it ends up being a financial blunder, they only take 20% of the blame, rather than 100%. It looks from here like a typical corporate st