I can recall reading something about a recently elected Democrat POTUS setting a goal for the USA to reach by the end of the decade. The difference then was that people took him seriously. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
JFK was a young man, at least for someone elected POTUS, and he announced that by the end of the decade the USA was going to put a man on the moon and bring him back safely. For someone not even 50 years old and just elected POTUS any goal in the next 8 years should be taken seriously. J
And yet they have contributed despite their flights to more reductions in emissions than you could ever hope to achieve with your whataboutism bullshit.
So what you're saying is it'd be more ethical for them to not actually attend, not actually join the push for an overall reduction in emissions?
What is there to talk about? Is anyone not aware of the problem? If they didn't think it was a problem then they would not show up. Bu then what do they need to talk about? They've already been told what the solution is to lowering CO2. Subject matter experts all agree that we need nuclear fission power and synthesized hydrocarbon fuels. Nobody needs to meet about that, just do it.
This is a worthless meeting because it's a bunch of people that will announce worthless 20 year goals and get their photo
No he won't. A Republican will get into power eventually and erase most climate edicts.
What climate edicts? The government has access to the best and brightest engineers and scientists in the world, and they are telling them that we will not lower CO2 emissions without nuclear fission power. I'll believe Democrats are serious about "climate edicts" when they can say the word "nuclear" in reference to anything but weapons.
I can recall reading something about a recently elected Democrat POTUS setting a goal for the USA to reach by the end of the decade. The difference then was that people took him seriously.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
JFK was a young man, at least for someone elected POTUS, and he announced that by the end of the decade the USA was going to put a man on the moon and bring him back safely. For someone not even 50 years old and just elected POTUS any goal in the next 8 years should be taken seriously. J
And yet they have contributed despite their flights to more reductions in emissions than you could ever hope to achieve with your whataboutism bullshit.
So what you're saying is it'd be more ethical for them to not actually attend, not actually join the push for an overall reduction in emissions?
What is there to talk about? Is anyone not aware of the problem? If they didn't think it was a problem then they would not show up. Bu then what do they need to talk about? They've already been told what the solution is to lowering CO2. Subject matter experts all agree that we need nuclear fission power and synthesized hydrocarbon fuels. Nobody needs to meet about that, just do it.
This is a worthless meeting because it's a bunch of people that will announce worthless 20 year goals and get their photo
No he won't. A Republican will get into power eventually and erase most climate edicts.
What climate edicts? The government has access to the best and brightest engineers and scientists in the world, and they are telling them that we will not lower CO2 emissions without nuclear fission power. I'll believe Democrats are serious about "climate edicts" when they can say the word "nuclear" in reference to anything but weapons.
How far into 2022 will we get before you repost this saying that same thing about 2023? 2024? You can't be wrong forever.
2022 will be the year of desktop Linux!