So, your saying if you build a tollway, such as we do have, to transport vehicles on, and people pay for that through their tolls. That in fact you should receive a portion of the value they carry?
*Every* ISP spends money on laying fiber. Comcast already got their fair share of the profits from their subscriber fees from their customers. What those customers choose to do with the bandwidth once it's sold is none of their damn business. If Comcast wants money directly from YouTube, they should put in a competitive bid to be YouTube's ISP.
Everything about getting rid of net neutrality is problematic. Breaking the standard internet peering system out of short-term greed and a desire to double-dip ha
Keep the good news coming, USA!
Maybe stop using the word terrorize when its not appropriate. Ajit Pai is an idjit of the highest order but probably not a terrorist.
Bring back Net Neutrality, I don't care. It didn't destroy the webz, that work is being done daily by big tech.
It's hilarious that the left can call some bureaucratic bullshit terrorism, but months of violent riots were peaceful protests.
So, your saying if you build a tollway, such as we do have, to transport vehicles on, and people pay for that through their tolls. That in fact you should receive a portion of the value they carry?
I think that's what your saying...
*Every* ISP spends money on laying fiber. Comcast already got their fair share of the profits from their subscriber fees from their customers. What those customers choose to do with the bandwidth once it's sold is none of their damn business. If Comcast wants money directly from YouTube, they should put in a competitive bid to be YouTube's ISP.
Everything about getting rid of net neutrality is problematic. Breaking the standard internet peering system out of short-term greed and a desire to double-dip ha