It's very simple, Zoom claimed they were using end to end encryption. They were not. They knew they were not. The lack of it materially increases the risk of private communication being leaked.
What did they expect when they allowed lawyers to use their service? With over 1,340,000 lawyers in the Untied States there's a lawsuit hiding behind every door, after all, those yachts cost some serious money.
It's very simple, Zoom claimed they were using end to end encryption. They were not. They knew they were not. The lack of it materially increases the risk of private communication being leaked.
So why shouldn't they face a penalty for that?
What did they expect when they allowed lawyers to use their service? With over 1,340,000 lawyers in the Untied States there's a lawsuit hiding behind every door, after all, those yachts cost some serious money.
OK zoomer.