The 1-week air travel shutdown in the U.S. after 9/11 provided valuable data how the atmosphere behaved in the absence of airliners injecting CO2 directly into the upper atmosphere (warming), and generating contrails which increased the planet's albedo and reflected more sunlight back into space (cooling). The overall conclusion was that the effect of the contrails outweighed the effect of the CO2, and that air travel was masking some of the global warming we should've been experiencing, by cooling the Ear
Solandi, I don't think we can draw any solid conclusions about the effects or lack thereof on a system as large as the Earth from just one weeks' worth of data. You may well be right but we'd need to have no air travel to speak of for a considerably longer period of time, years or even decades, before getting a glimpse of any long-term effects.
There are already anecdotal reports of the massive difference when humans aren't polluting the planet. From New Delhi, India [9cache.com] to Jalandhar [imgur.com] India [imgur.com] (before and after) to the Yamuna river in India [9cache.com].
How do you expect people to understand the concept of a condom when most of the world shits outside in fields and washes themselves with sand or dirty water?
There are already anecdotal reports of the massive difference when humans aren't polluting the planet. From New Delhi, India [9cache.com] to Jalandhar [imgur.com] India [imgur.com] (before and after) to the Yamuna river in India [9cache.com].
Here are satellite imaging of the massive reduction in pollution. From China [imgur.com] and from China again [9cache.com], then from Italy [9cache.com]. Here is LA [9cache.com].
You are telling us that you believe the cones on your sound system speakers never move? Vibrations are movement.