Who would have ever thought such a fine, upstanding, god-fearing Christian like Ralph Reed would be involved in such illegal activities. Surely this is the work of the devil.
Even more shocking is conservatives would be involved in this charade. The people who keep talking about the rule of law would never dare to stoop such nefarious shenanigans as to lie to a government agency. This must have been a liberal trick to besmirch their pristine reputation.
I even sent two submissions with different viewpoints. Only one was sent from myself....
Does the FCC care it had fake submissions? No, they had firmly made a decisions and were simply following through on the requirements. Public comment is required, but it doesn’t impact the decision in any way.
If you want change you need to write to your representatives and volunteer. Put some effort into fixing the things wrong with government.
Shane Cory runs Media Bridge, an internet PR firm, and has since 2013.
Cory worked for Project Veritas as a PR flack for part of 2011, and was booted from the Libertarian Party even earlier, in 2008. Yet the summary and the article feel the need to highlight these associations (even though they have absolutely zero bearing on the accusation) DESPITE knowing that Media Bridge was hired by the industry group "Broadband of America". It's telling that the article chose to highlight those old associations, and
Because people are fundamentally tribal, and what the tribe actually does isn't relevant. If the leaders of the tribe point in a direction, it's human nature to follow. It takes actual willpower to look at the people on your side of the fence and ask "Are these people actually representing my interests?" I'm not claiming any special intelligence or insight, it's just that I don't particularly like people very much, and really don't trust any large conglomeration of them. So I refuse to join political moveme
or was it one of their people? Do we have evidence the party itself was involved?
He was a former executive director of the LP.
Libertarians have a long history of defending monopolies and anti-competitive behavior, believing the market will magically fix it. I agree with the LP on many issues, including that government cronyism and regulatory capture is often at the core of these problems, and I consider myself a lowercase libertarian.
But there is an appropriate role for regulation, and NN prevents a clear conflict of interest. If a company has an effective local monopoly on Internet s
Who would have ever thought such a fine, upstanding, god-fearing Christian like Ralph Reed would be involved in such illegal activities. Surely this is the work of the devil.
Even more shocking is conservatives would be involved in this charade. The people who keep talking about the rule of law would never dare to stoop such nefarious shenanigans as to lie to a government agency. This must have been a liberal trick to besmirch their pristine reputation.
I even sent two submissions with different viewpoints. Only one was sent from myself....
Does the FCC care it had fake submissions? No, they had firmly made a decisions and were simply following through on the requirements. Public comment is required, but it doesn’t impact the decision in any way.
If you want change you need to write to your representatives and volunteer. Put some effort into fixing the things wrong with government.
Shane Cory runs Media Bridge, an internet PR firm, and has since 2013.
Cory worked for Project Veritas as a PR flack for part of 2011, and was booted from the Libertarian Party even earlier, in 2008. Yet the summary and the article feel the need to highlight these associations (even though they have absolutely zero bearing on the accusation) DESPITE knowing that Media Bridge was hired by the industry group "Broadband of America". It's telling that the article chose to highlight those old associations, and
Because people are fundamentally tribal, and what the tribe actually does isn't relevant. If the leaders of the tribe point in a direction, it's human nature to follow. It takes actual willpower to look at the people on your side of the fence and ask "Are these people actually representing my interests?" I'm not claiming any special intelligence or insight, it's just that I don't particularly like people very much, and really don't trust any large conglomeration of them. So I refuse to join political moveme
or was it one of their people? Do we have evidence the party itself was involved?
He was a former executive director of the LP.
Libertarians have a long history of defending monopolies and anti-competitive behavior, believing the market will magically fix it. I agree with the LP on many issues, including that government cronyism and regulatory capture is often at the core of these problems, and I consider myself a lowercase libertarian.
But there is an appropriate role for regulation, and NN prevents a clear conflict of interest. If a company has an effective local monopoly on Internet s