That's the realms of risk management. Quite correct to say "X may happen". But where, on the spectrum of possibilities? People have been aware of this risk for a goodly long time, and there are literally hordes of people working on solutions to make it as unlikely as possible. What I'm seeing increasingly is people having absolutely no concept of where on the spectrum of risk things are, and marking any risk as unacceptable. This is, of course, impossible. With that kind of thinking, at the start of hum
There is nothing evil — nor even unethical — about weapons-development. Firing people for their opinions — unrelated to their duties [wsj.com] — now that may be wrong. Weapons-development? No, that is fine, whether you work for Google or General Dynamics.
It started off so ethically, and look at it now
Bullshit. It started off with an awesome search-engine, and that is why everybody liked it. And continues to.
The moment someone creates a better search engine, we'll all switch over and Google will go the way of Altavista.
There is nothing evil — nor even unethical — about weapons-development. Firing people for their opinions — unrelated to their duties [wsj.com] — now that may be wrong. Weapons-development? No, that is fine, whether you work for Google or General Dynamics.
It started off so ethically, and look at it now
Bullshit. It started off with an awesome search-engine, and that is why everybody liked it. And continues to.
The moment someone creates a better search engine, we'll all switch over and Google will go the way of Altavista.
I can't agree with anything you claim, violence simply begets more violence. Even in cases of self defence, violence is rarely, if ever, the best option. You're obviously not familiar with Morihei Ueshiba and Aikido, but you've most likely heard of Gandhi, so you should be aware there are realistically better options than resorting to violence. Violence is merely the last and usual response of the incompetent. Weapons development is merely the advancement and reliance upon violence. The only end to an arms
... you're obviously not familiar with Morihei Ueshiba and Aikido...
That is civilian self defense, not military. Apples and oranges.
... but you've most likely heard of Gandhi...
You only heard of him because he opposed a civilized western culture that was relatively low on the body count scale of things. Try that with a different government and he'd of been dead at a young age.
... so you should be aware there are realistically better options than resorting to violence...
You own logic proves you wrong in this case. Having a military is the government level equivalent to a civilian studying Akido. Training and arming a military is no more an act of violence than regularly going to the dojo to learn a marital ar
The moral of the story is that exaggerating about the present capabilities of "AI" can do more than just fleece investors.
That's the realms of risk management. Quite correct to say "X may happen". But where, on the spectrum of possibilities? People have been aware of this risk for a goodly long time, and there are literally hordes of people working on solutions to make it as unlikely as possible.
What I'm seeing increasingly is people having absolutely no concept of where on the spectrum of risk things are, and marking any risk as unacceptable. This is, of course, impossible. With that kind of thinking, at the start of hum
There is nothing evil — nor even unethical — about weapons-development. Firing people for their opinions — unrelated to their duties [wsj.com] — now that may be wrong. Weapons-development? No, that is fine, whether you work for Google or General Dynamics.
Bullshit. It started off with an awesome search-engine, and that is why everybody liked it. And continues to.
The moment someone creates a better search engine, we'll all switch over and Google will go the way of Altavista.
There is nothing evil — nor even unethical — about weapons-development. Firing people for their opinions — unrelated to their duties [wsj.com] — now that may be wrong. Weapons-development? No, that is fine, whether you work for Google or General Dynamics.
Bullshit. It started off with an awesome search-engine, and that is why everybody liked it. And continues to.
The moment someone creates a better search engine, we'll all switch over and Google will go the way of Altavista.
I can't agree with anything you claim, violence simply begets more violence. Even in cases of self defence, violence is rarely, if ever, the best option. You're obviously not familiar with Morihei Ueshiba and Aikido, but you've most likely heard of Gandhi, so you should be aware there are realistically better options than resorting to violence. Violence is merely the last and usual response of the incompetent. Weapons development is merely the advancement and reliance upon violence. The only end to an arms
... you're obviously not familiar with Morihei Ueshiba and Aikido ...
That is civilian self defense, not military. Apples and oranges.
... but you've most likely heard of Gandhi ...
You only heard of him because he opposed a civilized western culture that was relatively low on the body count scale of things. Try that with a different government and he'd of been dead at a young age.
... so you should be aware there are realistically better options than resorting to violence ...
You own logic proves you wrong in this case. Having a military is the government level equivalent to a civilian studying Akido. Training and arming a military is no more an act of violence than regularly going to the dojo to learn a marital ar