Banning Trump from Twitter is the last thing they are going to do. I'll bet they will even change the Terms of Service to keep him on. No, they want to keep Trump on their platform at all costs. Trump being there brings so much attention to Twitter, and therefor eyes, and therefor dollars.
Beside banning Trump would just lead more fuel to the fire on calls to regulate social media. An now you would the have the full weight of the executive branch behind such calls. An despite what you personally thi
Their argument tends to be that religious belief (at least certain ones) are justification, but nothing else is. But more importantly, they think in terms of natural order, which shapes what they see as 'real' discrimination vs 'faux outrage'. This framework basically lets them say that discrimination against minorities and such isn't real because it just reflects their place in the world, while things that upset white christians is true discrimination because they deserve to be top of the pile. That is
That's not what centrist means. It's not an average of the total number of opinions. Think of it more like adding the deviation from center over the set of all the opinions.
...Twitter should ban the serial Terms of Service violator Trump before this goes into effect. Up the game, gents.
Banning Trump from Twitter is the last thing they are going to do. I'll bet they will even change the Terms of Service to keep him on. No, they want to keep Trump on their platform at all costs. Trump being there brings so much attention to Twitter, and therefor eyes, and therefor dollars.
Beside banning Trump would just lead more fuel to the fire on calls to regulate social media. An now you would the have the full weight of the executive branch behind such calls. An despite what you personally thi