How about you quit shooting the messenger and start contributing to that solution yourselves, instead of getting in the way.
Consider this the climate alarm clock. It's not going to stop just because you don't like hearing it. It's only going to get louder, until you pull your head out from under the covers and act, instead of complaining about the noise.
But holy shit... can you stop with the incessant fear-mongering?!
Let me ask you a question. If a meteor was coming to hit the Earth and we knew that this was going to be a continent leveler. What do you think the correct way to explain that to people would be? Let's say we identify that meteor way ahead of time. We've got 40 years to figure out what to do about the problem. We know, some continent on this planet is going to be wiped from existence and those that survive will have a hard time living. However, we've got four decades to figure out what to do. What do
This looks interesting, they are turning plastic into electricity and hydrogen gas. They seem to think hydrogen would make a good transportation fuel but it doesn't.
Or maybe we could have news on where people running for POTUS in the next election stand on energy policy to address global warming, that might make for a good discussion. https://www.forbes.co [forbes.com]
Why are you talking about wired? Magazine are shit for science information to the general public.
Man made global warming is real, and trivial to prove. Can be done i any college science class. Predicting the impact on the climate in specificity is harder, but that doesn't mean it's not happening.
I'm going out on a limb and saying you believe in gravity. The existence of gravity is pretty simple to prove, would you agree?*
Now, If I drop a water glass on the concrete and it shatters, there is no model in the wo
Yeah, it's anger inducing. Please try to not go off. I know it's hard and I have fallen into the trap myself. What I do is list the most base science for global warming. Something that can be tested by every college, energy company, government, right wing lunatic in the world.
Or an example of how that just because models don't forecast the climate exactly correct, doesn't men Global Warming isn't real.
Also, I'll let you in on a secret. While it would be great if the person I reply to actually begins some rat
Dear people who use the term "mainstream media",
How about you quit shooting the messenger and start contributing to that solution yourselves, instead of getting in the way.
Consider this the climate alarm clock. It's not going to stop just because you don't like hearing it. It's only going to get louder, until you pull your head out from under the covers and act, instead of complaining about the noise.
But holy shit... can you stop with the incessant fear-mongering?!
Let me ask you a question. If a meteor was coming to hit the Earth and we knew that this was going to be a continent leveler. What do you think the correct way to explain that to people would be? Let's say we identify that meteor way ahead of time. We've got 40 years to figure out what to do about the problem. We know, some continent on this planet is going to be wiped from existence and those that survive will have a hard time living. However, we've got four decades to figure out what to do. What do
Is climate change every day really news for nerds?
I believe it would be if we were discussing solutions instead of just more nuance on the problem.
Solutions like this one.
https://insights.globalspec.co... [globalspec.com]
This looks interesting, they are turning plastic into electricity and hydrogen gas. They seem to think hydrogen would make a good transportation fuel but it doesn't.
Or maybe we could have news on where people running for POTUS in the next election stand on energy policy to address global warming, that might make for a good discussion.
https://www.forbes.co [forbes.com]
Why are you talking about wired? Magazine are shit for science information to the general public.
Man made global warming is real, and trivial to prove. Can be done i any college science class.
Predicting the impact on the climate in specificity is harder, but that doesn't mean it's not happening.
I'm going out on a limb and saying you believe in gravity.
The existence of gravity is pretty simple to prove, would you agree?*
Now, If I drop a water glass on the concrete and it shatters, there is no model in the wo
Yeah, it's anger inducing. Please try to not go off. I know it's hard and I have fallen into the trap myself.
What I do is list the most base science for global warming. Something that can be tested by every college, energy company, government, right wing lunatic in the world.
Or an example of how that just because models don't forecast the climate exactly correct, doesn't men Global Warming isn't real.
Also, I'll let you in on a secret. While it would be great if the person I reply to actually begins some rat