it needlessly endangered our children, our loved ones and our men and women in law enforcement.
I would so much rather a criminal attempt a public shooting with a flimsy piece of shit that's as likely to explode in his hand as it is to hurt someone else than with a rifle with a modified lower receiver. These stupid trinkets are not an issue, actual firearms are easier and cheaper to obtain than a damn 3D printer. Priorities, people.
preliminary injunction continuing a prohibition on the Trump administration proposal to make available blueprints for so-called ghost guns, untraceable weapons
The Trump administration makes no such proposal to make available blueprints for so-called ghost guns.
Defense distributed plans to do this all on their own; The administration simply acknowledges the rule of law that under the constitution that congress is not allowed to have a prior restraint on the release to 1st amendment Free Speech rights; that
Who is manufacturing them? This is like Metallica suing Napster for distributing mp3 files. The judge says you can't download these files. What if you printed the text of these files into a book and sold it? Would that book be deemed illegal?
What is so complicated about "[s]hall not be infringed?"
The Second Amendment talks about the right to keep and bear arms, not manufacture them...
Who is manufacturing them? This is like Metallica suing Napster for distributing mp3 files. The judge says you can't download these files. What if you printed the text of these files into a book and sold it? Would that book be deemed illegal?
Then it sounds like a First Amendment issue, not Second.
You can make a shotgun out of two pieces of pipe and a nail.
it needlessly endangered our children, our loved ones and our men and women in law enforcement.
I would so much rather a criminal attempt a public shooting with a flimsy piece of shit that's as likely to explode in his hand as it is to hurt someone else than with a rifle with a modified lower receiver. These stupid trinkets are not an issue, actual firearms are easier and cheaper to obtain than a damn 3D printer. Priorities, people.
preliminary injunction continuing a prohibition on the Trump administration proposal to make available blueprints for so-called ghost guns, untraceable weapons
The Trump administration makes no such proposal to make available blueprints for so-called ghost guns.
Defense distributed plans to do this all on their own; The administration simply acknowledges the rule of law that
under the constitution that congress is not allowed to have a prior restraint on the release to 1st amendment Free Speech rights;
that
Who is manufacturing them? This is like Metallica suing Napster for distributing mp3 files. The judge says you can't download these files. What if you printed the text of these files into a book and sold it? Would that book be deemed illegal?
What is so complicated about "[s]hall not be infringed?"
The Second Amendment talks about the right to keep and bear arms, not manufacture them ...
Who is manufacturing them? This is like Metallica suing Napster for distributing mp3 files. The judge says you can't download these files. What if you printed the text of these files into a book and sold it? Would that book be deemed illegal?
Then it sounds like a First Amendment issue, not Second.