Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
User Journal

Journal Trolling4Dollars's Journal: Election 2004: The Bottom Line 4

This has to be the worst presidential campaign year I've witnessed to date. People are so heavily polarized that it ensures that no third party has a prayer of winning. The two candidates are complete jackasses. Bush will surely lead us further down the wrong path. Kerry will probably just be ineffective. It's a complete travesty. What to do, what to do?

Putting aside any partisan feelings you may have. Sit down and ask yourself some important questions. The answers don't have to add up to any particular candidate as these questions will have different answers for everyone:

1. What has the current administration personally done to make my life harder/easier? Will I benefit from this administration staying or going?
2. Since both parties have nothing to offer but duds, which one do I think will do the least damage to the quality of life for me and my loved ones? What, exactly, do I define as "quality of life"? Living in a gated community? Putting food on the table? Improving my condition?
3. IMPORTANT: How has my life changed during this administration? Is it better? Worse? Same as it ever was? If it did change, how did it change exactly and how is the current administration responsible for this change? How do I think a Kerry administration would fare?
4. IMPORTANT: What services has the current administration provided that have personally helped/harmed me? How do I think a Kerry administration would perform in this arena compared to Bush?
5. Considering that by some accounts both Kerry and Bush supported the operations in Iraq, how do I think the operations have gone? Does the current state there reflect something that we should hold ANYONE (yes even Kerry) who supported the action accountable, or are the problems there soley the responsibility of the new free government of Iraq? Can it even be considered that there is a free government in Iraq?
6. Comparing American media on Sept. 11th 1999 with Sept. 11th 2004, has there been a chilling effect on truth in media caused by the Bush administration? Will Kerry do the same? (Oddly, if you think about it, the media as a whole are creidted with bring ultra -conservative liberal whackos.)
7. IMPORTANT: Regarding dissent; Since the Bush administration have created the concept of "free speech" zones and most conservatives seem to be OK with this. Let me put this question to conservatives: Would you like to see the practice continued if Kerry were to win the election and he was running again in 2008? Would you feel that being kept a little over a mile away from the candidate and his followers would be an effective way of voicing your dissent? For the liberals: Would you like to see Free Speech zones continued if Kerry were to win the election? Do you think tit-for-tat is a good policy?
8. IMPORTANT: How do you make the distinction regarding which "moral" aspects of the private life of a candidate are important to that candidate's suitability to office? Is sexual preference an issue that would make a candidate unfit for office? What about extramarital affairs? Would a history of drinking or drug problems concern you? Which of these selected topics would have a stronger influence on how the president governs you personally? Is Bush's past with drinking and cocaine an issue? What about any possible affairs? Kerry? And the big question: why?
9. Specifically for the christian conservative: Do you think religion should have any impact on the governing of the U.S? If so, do you think that Bush has exemplified the image of a godly man? Are you willing to look away from some of the possible issues with Bush since he talks the talk?

Sit down and ask yourself these questions. If you want, post your answers here. But whatever you do, forget all the partisan crap and look at facts. There are serious issues with both major candidates and a third party is now more than ever not an option. Not unless some third party candidate with a hell of a lot of charisma can sweep the country and sway the majority of voters. Honestly, I don't think [insert your chosen savior here] could make it as a third party candidate this year.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Election 2004: The Bottom Line

Comments Filter:
  • Actually, I consider this election to be almost a carbon copy of the last one as far as I'm concerned. We're faced with the evil of two lessers; an idiot and a hypocrite. When faced with this choice last time, I underestimated Bush and voted for him because I didn't realize how incredibly stupid he could be, or how it would affect the country, especially on Social Conservative and Fiscal Liberal issues. This time around I'm voting for Kerry- in hopes that his hypocrisy and intelligence will lead him to d
    • I agree. Sort of. I think the quality of the intellect of the Democrat has gone down compared to the last election. But at this point I want Bush out. He's bad for the country. Anyone who isn't falling for his schtick can see that. BTW... you had a typo up there. Didn't you mean "misunderestimate"?
      • A Vietnam war vet who came back to decry the war, or a guy who wrote a book on environmentalism then let his mining operation dump heavy metals into the Tennesse River. Both are hypocrites, and that's what I'm judging them on.

        A rock has more intelligence than our current president, unless it's a rock of crack, in which case it's exactly the same. Kerry would definately be an improvement on THAT. And yes, I guess I did misunderestimate Bush- he's far stupider than I ever gave him credit for.
  • 1. I pay a little less on taxes [all figures per month] me ~ $200. Wife too, about $150. But we pay about $200 more for health care. $50 more for gas. And we can hardly put a number figure on the shame that is done with my tax dollars.

    2. Least damage: a debtless future for my kids, a country where they can be brought up free (as in no Guantanamo, or "free speech" concentration camp). A place where getting cancer does not mean povertry for life. Or a nasty case of depression does not create homelessness. A

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...