Journal List of FAILURES's Journal: Top 40 Reasons Why Gun Nuts Need to be Shot 14
1. Banning guns works better than not banning guns, because it keeps every fucking mouth breather who has seen Red Dawn once too many times from thinking he's an army of one.
2. Washington DC's low murder rate of 69 per 100,000 is number play, as is Indianapolis' high murder rate of 9 per 100,000. While we're at it, let's compare East L.A. with Rat's Ass Nevada's crime rates. Sorry, but Indianapolis is not anywhere near the same kind of city that DC is.
3. Statistics are abused by both sides of the gun issue. So who are you going to believe? How about common sense? A moron with a gun is more dangerous than a moron without a gun. Considering that nearly every fucking gun nut is a moron, I think we have a winning theory here.
4. If you are going to compare the effects of the Brady Bill and supposedly lower crime rates (those goddamned stats raising their ugly heads again) at least try to support your argument that crime is INCREASING because of gun control. Another point for the moron theory.
5. We must get rid of gun nuts because they suffer from apocalyptic visions caused by their lack of a usable dick and must compensate by having a gun.
6. If you're a moron, and scared of your shadow, AND you have a gun, you will probably kill the wrong person and injure yourself. This defines nearly 100% of those opposed to gun control.
7. An intruder, if left alone to steal your DVD box set of Friends and Seinfeld will probably leave your house without killing you. If he does find you, and you just say, "take whatever you want" then he will do just that. Thieves don't WANT to go to prison for rape or murder.
8. A gun fanatic man with fantasies about women being raped and strangled or women with dead rapists at their feet is a sick individual and needs help.
9. The first sensible statement you morons have made. Now... do you have the balls to do it?: When confronted by violent criminals, you should "put up no defense --give them what they want, or run" (Handgun Control Inc. Chairman Pete Shields, Guns Don't Die - People Do, 1981, p.125).
10. I'd trust the writers at ANY professional journal of medicine with information about life over the nutcakes who stroke their guns (remember that they don't have usable dicks) at Guns and Ammo.
11. One should insult a primary representative of the opposition because it feels so much better. Especially when you don't have a usable dick.
12. The 2nd Amendment, ratified in 1787, refers to a time that has long since come and gone. The world is not that simple any more and it's never going to be again. Grow the fuck up and get a pair you dickless wonders!
13. If you like old fashioned views on the way our country should be run, then go join a civil war or revolutionary war re-enactment club. Or maybe the SCA. But please spare us your ridiculous viewpoint on how things are done in the fucking 21st century.
14. These phrases:
"right of the people peaceably to assemble" (Gone thanks to Bush and his "free speech" zones)
"right of the people to be secure in their homes" (a dream that left the world in the 1960s never to return... if you're a spineless fearmonkey who doesn't have a usable dick)
"enumeration's herein of certain rights shall not be construed to disparage others retained by the people" (You are NOT a sovereign citizen nor should you be. You are a moron with a fear habit. )
15. We don't need guns against an oppressive government, because pea shooters don't do much good against tanks. Trust me, if the government became REALLY oppressive, there is not a dick lot of anything you can do about it. Bush is an asshole but we haven't hit the fully oppressive state yet. And if we did, we'd be screwed. A REAL dictator would sooner nuke his entire country than be deposed. Fat lot of good your fucking gun will do you then. But I'll be sure to laugh at you as you are running around waving your gun saying "This isn't fair! This isn't fair!!"
16. Rifles and handguns in the hands of moronic fearmoneys who will shot anything that moves aren't necessary to national defense. In fact they would be a hinderance. Let's put it this way, do you really want your stupid fucking users administering your network? Same thing. Gun fanatic != expert. In fact, I'll go so far as to say pro-gun fanatics NEVER = experts.
17. Private citizens shouldn't have handguns or "assault rifles", period. Because private citizens tend to be fearful morons who think they know everything. See point 16 for more exapnsion on this topic.
18. It's easy to take something as touchy as the increase in school shootings and claim that gun laws are responsible even though there is NO CONNECTION. It's harder to actually learn something about the changes in American society at large that actually have caused the increase (How about, the rise in poverty, less funding for education, both parents HAVING to work to pull together a living wage, dietary changes that have been shown to cause massive behavior changes like ADD just for starters?) in school shootings and realize that they have NOTHING TO FUCKING DO with gun control laws.
19. The NRA needs to have their heads examined and Charlton Heston needs that silver bullet the NRA offers new members buried deep in his senile old brain.
20. The ramifications of taking a life are so complex that special training is necessary in order to use a gun properly, but most people would fail the ethics test which is why guns are so simple to use without thinking that they make murder easy.
21. The ease of use of a gun has NOTHING at all to FUCKING do with the ramifications of taking a life or seriously injuring someone. EVERY human life is valuable. Yes, even the guy who is stealing your Friends and Sienfeld DVD box sets downstairs.
22. Using the "guns are easy to use" argument doesn't strengthen your case you dilholes. That is EXACTLY the problem. They ARE easy to use, but the results are not easy to deal with. If you think you are justified in taking someone else's life under most circumstances, you need your fucking head examined. Put those delusions of being right out of your head. You're just a sick fucking bastard.
23. Morons with a sense of self importance and a gun that is really easy to use to take a life turn into slaughtering butchers who then try to justify their crimes by claiming self-defence when no threat was ever present. Someone breaking into your house is not a threat. It's an inconvenience.
24. Guns + morons = a disaster waiting to happen. I can't wait until some gun nut at a gun show goes ballistic and kills a few of you dorks. Then you all go after him claiming self defence. God I hate fearmonkeys!
25. Dontcha just love how they take unrelated concepts and put them together acting like they make sense?
26. Um yes, if it can be used to off a bunch of people in a crowd: "A self-loading small arm can legitimately be considered to be a "weapon of mass destruction" or an "assault weapon."
27. Here let me help you with that: "Most people can't be trusted to have a brain, so we should have laws against guns that come with sever consquences. Some people won't abide by them because they are moronic fearmonkeys. So what? That's life you dickless wonders.
28. Huh? How did we get to pornography? Never mind the fact that sex is the more likely way to ensure peace and feeling secure than a gun is. But then again you guys wouldn't know about that becasue you don't have usable dicks.
29. You can rarely justify the killing of another individual.
30. Another bit of truth! Amazing, maybe there is hope for the fearmonkeys after all! Probably not though: "The ACLU is good because it uncompromisingly defends certain parts of the Constitution, and the NRA is bad, because it defends other parts of the Constitution."
31. Charlton Heston as president of the NRA is a shill (yes). Michael Douglas as a representative of Handgun Control, Inc. is an ambassador for peace who is entitled to an audience at the UN arms control summit. (yes) Since when has the NRA and it's wild band of fearmonkeys ever paid heed to the UN anyway?
32. The average civilian is not going to be faced with a possible life threatening confrontation more than once or twice in their lives. Which means they need less ammunition if any. Whereas a policeman is going to be faced with a life threatening situation far more often than you fearmonkeys can handle. There fore, he is justified in having more ammunition.
33. How about instead we make sure that a person has an intelligence quotient over 140 and has to take a full psych eval before they can even go to a one year training course in using a gun properly (not the usage, but the ethics). I think that would be pretty fair. We'd probably find that there are VERY few people who are suitable candidates for gun ownership in this country if we actually did that.
34. This is a pretty ridiculous way of stating the obvious: "Police officers, who qualify with their duty weapons once or twice a year, have some special Jedi-like mastery over handguns that private citizens can never hope to obtain." Fearmonkeys will never be able to use guns properly when it comes to ethics. If you even think you are justified in shooting someone for just being in your house, you need to die.
35. Private citizens don't need a gun for self-protection because the odds of being faced with an armed and crazed killer or rapist are so low that I wouldn't even wager $.50 on it. Would you? If you would, then you are a fearmonkey who needs your head examined.
36. More rhetorical bullshit. A deskbound cop is still going to be pressed into service if needed and needs to be armed. YOU DON'T.
37. "Assault weapons" have no purpose other than to kill large numbers of people, which is why no one "needs" them.
38. Buying guns from any manufacturer doesn't matter a dick in this argument. Just like your non-working member.
39. The average person is not mentally equipped to deal with using a gun from an ethical standpoint. Trigger locks are useful in delaying what could in many cases become a tragedy.
40. There should be an entry in the fucking dictionary that says "Bad People" = Fucking moron fearmonkeys who think they can handle guns.
Good to see you again, LoF (Score:2)
Re:Good to see you again, LoF (Score:1)
1. Canada's higher rate of gun ownership and lower gun crime/gun accident rate.
2. Switzerland's higher rate of gun ownership and lower gun crime/gun accident rate.
3. Great Britian's violent crime rate increases since handguns were banned there.
I don't think guns are the problem. I think our culture and our population density are the problems here, especially (as much as I hate to say it) the race/poverty issues in the inner cities. Look at Europe's cities and you'll see their
Re:Good to see you again, LoF (Score:2)
This isn't the first liberal I've seen on here that is immature and basically screams and insults. Getting harder and harder to have a normal debate/conversation on
---adds Zeriel as a Friend----
Re:Good to see you again, LoF (Score:1)
Re:Good to see you again, LoF (Score:2)
I have one thing to say about all this. (Score:1)
You make a lot of half-assed points complaining the average idiot shouldn't be allowed to own a gun.
My question is: If a idiot isn't ethically or intellectually capable of owning an individual firearm, why should we extend to that individual the right to vote for the people who have their fingers on nuclear triggers?
In my opinion, I think that the level of intellectual and moral strength you n
Re:I have one thing to say about all this. (Score:1)
Re:I have one thing to say about all this. (Score:2)
I think that is a much better approach than simply banning guns. Trouble is, you get a jury of your peers, and if that jury is made up of mouth-breathing, gun-stroking nutjobs, you can shoot a Japanese exchange student who knocks on your door on Halloween [pledge.org], or a repo-man repossessing your car, or a woman hanging laundry in her back yard [cnn.com], and not have any penalty.
Re:I have one thing to say about all this. (Score:2)
What I mean by saying this is that, if you DO shoot someone in self-defense, you should be investigated just as vigorously as any other criminal.
In most places, you are. Self-defense isn't a justification for killing someone, and DAs aren't going to pass up the chance to bring a court case. In fact, a good way to wind up with a manslaughter charge is to shoot someone without justification.
Bear this in mind, as well. If you break into someone's house, you've stepped beyond the bounds of the legal system'
Re:I have one thing to say about all this. (Score:1)
The last time I was mugged, the guy pulled a switchblade on me. Being that I was lucky enough to get mugged on the way back from a ren faire, I then pulled out a full-
Re:I have one thing to say about all this. (Score:1)
Re:I have one thing to say about all this. (Score:1)
Re:I have one thing to say about all this. (Score:2)
Relax (Score:2)
I don't think you generalize so much because you actually believe what you wrote about all gun owners, I think you're deliberately trying to inflame things or maybe have a little fun. At any rate, chill a little and maybe we can discuss this.