Journal FortKnox's Journal: I've been banned... [UPDATED!] 26
Yes, a subnet ban. Due to excessive bad posting. I haven't posted anon in probably... oh... months. Its been 5 days since I've had a downmod (a single negative mod... from score:2 to score:1), and the post before that? Score: 5 (it was posted two minutes before teh down modded one).
I feel so ashamed. I would try to email the place they say to email, but after reading several other people's complaints about this subnet ban, I hear they pretty much tell you to 'stuff it.'
I guess you'll hear from me in JE's only from now to a couple days. Guess we'll have to wait a few days for the voice contest (unless someone wants to mod up some of my previous posts to try and lift the ban? Will that even work?).
Update: I went ahead and emailed the address (figured, what the hell... might as well try). Here's the error message if you are interested in it:
Due to excessive bad posting from this IP or Subnet, comment posting has temporarily been disabled. If it's you, consider this a chance to sit in the timeout corner . If it's someone else, this is a chance to hunt them down. If you think this is unfair, please email moderation@slashdot.org with your MD5'd IPID and SubnetID, which are "blah" and "meh" and (optionally, but preferably) your IP number "12.0.0.1" and your username "FortKnox".
Update2: I wonder... was it because I commented in trollback? I don't think so, because trollback is one of my 'zoo' friends, and has been for a while. Wasn't downmodded or anything, either.
I feel so ashamed. I would try to email the place they say to email, but after reading several other people's complaints about this subnet ban, I hear they pretty much tell you to 'stuff it.'
I guess you'll hear from me in JE's only from now to a couple days. Guess we'll have to wait a few days for the voice contest (unless someone wants to mod up some of my previous posts to try and lift the ban? Will that even work?).
Update: I went ahead and emailed the address (figured, what the hell... might as well try). Here's the error message if you are interested in it:
Due to excessive bad posting from this IP or Subnet, comment posting has temporarily been disabled. If it's you, consider this a chance to sit in the timeout corner . If it's someone else, this is a chance to hunt them down. If you think this is unfair, please email moderation@slashdot.org with your MD5'd IPID and SubnetID, which are "blah" and "meh" and (optionally, but preferably) your IP number "12.0.0.1" and your username "FortKnox".
Update2: I wonder... was it because I commented in trollback? I don't think so, because trollback is one of my 'zoo' friends, and has been for a while. Wasn't downmodded or anything, either.
yeah (Score:2)
I finally got a reply. (Score:2)
I think Organised Konfusion posted proxy details somewhere if you want to try that. I can at least post from home, or if I am at work I can remote into a machine on another s
'Nother reply from Malda... (Score:2)
So I guess it is a case of wait and see if/when you are ever allowed to post again.
Welcome to the club! (Score:1)
Welcome to the "Slashdot Spits in the Faces of Good Users Club"
You're in fine company with myself and [slashdot.org] the_mad_poster [slashdot.org] as cellmates.
My recommendations
If you're a subscriber: do not renew
Once your subscription lapses, use an ad blocker so they don't get cash that way either.
Find another way to post and include a link to your relevent journal entry in your sig.
Don't quit bitching about it. Their attitude "it's our site" fails to carry weight if they take donations/subscriptions.
Pass these tips
Re:Welcome to the club! (Score:1)
Adblock [mozdev.org] for Mozilla and Firebird works so well it's not funny. It blocks images, frames and flash ads (aka: Internet pollution).
We really need a place similar to slashdot but more mature to go. At one time k5 was pretty good but it seems to have fallen into a bit of a mire. Hopefully the Technocrat [technocrat.net] will take off. I'm ready to put /. back into my hosts as lo.
Re:Welcome to the club! (Score:1)
Unless your using 1.8a
Last time I used adblock with 1.8, it broke mozilla and I had to uninstall it.
I can't seem to find anything about it on their site, so I guess that it might just not work for me only.
Re:Welcome to the club! (Score:1)
Seems to be an epidemic (Score:1)
Kind of like punishing the whole class because there is one moron disruption you lesson.
Look, if you want I can try: I'll just log in as Corporate Troll, make a nice mess
Re:Seems to be an epidemic (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Heh. (Score:1)
He's coming out of the closet. FK, being gay is OK, bud. There's no need to hide behind a "blanket ban" like you are.
If you wish to refute my post, please login and reply
Oh, that was offsides wasn't it?
I don't know what tha dot is doing man. I'm not a coder, but it can't be too hard to code a ban based on mac address instead of IP. Hell, look at the packets, information that gets sent every s
Re:Heh. (Score:1)
To ban based on MAC they'd have to be on the same subnet (maybe proxy ARPing could do this, not sure) IE: "ping 1.2.3.4" "arp -a | grep 1.2.3.4" If you're on the same logical segment you'll get a MAC, if not you won't.
Re:Heh. (Score:2)
Subnet banning, though, is just annoying. There either has to be a better way to deal with idiots or admit the moderation system is somehow broken.
Better Subnet Banning (Score:2)
You ban Anonymous posting from a subnet and the offending account(s) if any. That way most users don't suffer for someone else's problem.
Yes, they can make a new account, but you can watch for down-mods in the "banned" subnet and be a little more vicious with the account banning in that subnet.
Maybe politics shouldn't come into play, but I think there should be a little more leeway for subscribers, especially in the case of subnet banning when you aren't being [very] bad.
NON STANDARD PORT PROXIES (Score:3, Informative)
69.47.156.116:63809
69.30.1
63.135.6.27:3382
205.208.226.59:8888
69.14.187.81:65506
200.168.96.234:6588
200.179.
200.101.120.178:6588
24.45.25.174:8
69.137.60.252:3382
216.145.90.218:8002
200.17
208.18.143.136:8002
216.203.181.34
217.37.119.42:8002
12.27.244.218:11285
21
63.160.254.40:8002
200.165.14
200.161.12.119:6588
212.129.232.100:6
12.104.44.40:8313
200.93.109.218:6588
200.2
193.255.207.252:8080S
211.75.180.
213.131.168.204:443
24.14.251.101:443
67.149.19.217:65506
209.251.3
200.21.248.131:443
200.89.233.95:6588
201.129.161.121:6588
200.42.173.218:4480
Re:NON STANDARD PORT PROXIES (Score:2)
Are all of these known good? Slashdot knows a lot of the public proxies on my list now so I have to constantly cycle through them. I don't know if they're just identifying them dynamically or if they keep a running list of them though.
Re:NON STANDARD PORT PROXIES (Score:2)
These are good as of 2 days ago but its really hit and miss
Complain anyway (Score:1)
OTOH... 5000+ comments? Sheesh, get a life!
Re:Complain anyway (Score:1)
Web Proxy (Score:2)
one good thing though (Score:2)
Re:one good thing though (Score:1)
The entire game is broken, and I wish I could just totally get rid of all mods except FoF. Unfortunately, the bonuses you could apply only applied to a single moderation. For example, if you pick a Troll modifier of +3, and a comment gets modded Troll 5 times, the score is -2, not +15. Or something like that.
this is crap (Score:1)
Testing... (Score:2)
Grumble (Score:2)
For example if it was your work IP that was banned very likely everyone at the same site shows up to slashdot as the same IP. So if someone else at work was being an idiot then you might very well have been caught in the same net. Another possiblity is that the subnet mask slashdot banned is larger than the actual allocation to your employer and someo
Re:Grumble (Score:2)
According to 'samzenpus@slashdot' (moderation@slashdot guy) "You have been modded down too many times and are now in the "time out" corner for a bit." so it looks as if the auto-banning criteria has been tightened to buggery. They don't seem to look at the net result of the moderations, just the number of down-mods.