Journal WolfElvendar's Journal: Senators unite (in idiocy and bad manners) 11
Ok, It is confirmed, both of my senators are either not listening to me at all when I write, or are just plain stupid! I wrote a while back concerning a bill in committee. The bill would allow congress to overturn a Supreme court decision with a 2/3 vote, thus totally screwing over the system of checks and balances. It was introduced because of the outrage of many senators at the Mass court ruling it was unconstitutional to prevent gay marriage, however I wasn't even making a statement about gay marriages at all, just that the bill was unconstitutional and needed to be quashed as quick as possible. (ok, so I was little more elegant in my letters to the senators.)
Both of my senators, yes that is right, BOTH, sent me a letter that basically stated, thank you for sending a letter stating your concerns about the issue of marriage and the marriage amendment. WTF?!?!? I did not do any such thing. Can you or your employees read at all?!?! If I wanted to write a letter about the "historical definition of marriage" (Sen. George Allen) I would have, but I didn't. I said that the congress should not pass a bill that would screw the constitution once again, and blow to hell the checks that keep you stupid Senators from over stepping your bounds.
So I sat here and went through both of these letters about how they did not support gay marriage and would do all they can to stop this. I also read about how Sen. John Warner cosponsored a bill that HAS BEEN SIGNED INTO LAW that will allow a state to NOT RECOGNISE a gay marriage, even if the state they married in did (PL:104-199). The new law also defines marriage for the purposes of federal law as the union of one man and one woman and the word "spouse" as a person of the opposite sex that is a husband of wife. Well Gentlemen, you both just told me that once again you are doing the very opposite that I think should be done... But aside from that, I did not write about that dumb ass!!!!!
I am sorry for my gay friends, that the federal government has chosen to butt it's ugly head into your homes once again. I will not say that I think gay marriage is spiritually the healthiest thing you can do, but it sure as hell is not the government's business. Me and my wife will argue about this later I am sure.
How can the government take separation of church and state to the point of removing prayer from schools and yet base marriage on religious morals, and then ignore the roots of this traditional view of marriage. That is where the view of the "traditional" marriage comes from isn't it. And yet they make laws to keep this narrow view and keep a couple from professing their love for each other publicly and be recognized legally. It makes no sense to me.... Ok discuss, flame, troll, whatever.
distraction (Score:2)
What morons (Score:1)
I'm not even getting into the whole gay marriage thing.....such a touchy subject.
and wow, you're married..didn't know you were..you don't act married :)
Re:What morons (Score:1)
Well.... (Score:1)
Re:Well.... (Score:1)
I don't talk about my wife in my journal too much for a few reasons. This is my place to vent and discuss my beleifs, ideals, gripes, and stuff. One thing I think many failed marrages lack is a SAFE place for people to have their own space. My Ex-Wife had too much space, but
Re:Well.... (Score:1)
Re:Well.... (Score:1)
no dear,we won't argue about it........ (Score:1)
I see a moral decline in this country and it bothers me. Gay marriage is just another step...Do I care what people do in their own homes? NO. Do I care if my daughter sees two men or two women kissing in public? YES. Sorry, call me fanatical, call me old fashioned, you can even call me a narrow-minded idiot.
Not about gay marriage (Score:2)
Basically it would destroy any hope of ever restoring government as defined by the Constitution, short of armed rebellion.
If passed, it would basically lead to a paradox-- clearly the Supreme Court would rule it unconstitutional, but then couldn't Congress overturn the Supreme Court using the law itself? And at that point, we are at the whim of a bunch of overpaid lawyers who stopped caring what their constituent
Re:Not about gay marriage (Score:1)
"Basically it would destroy any hope of ever restoring government as defined by the Constitution, short of armed rebellion."
An armed rebellion, I fear, will be difficult before too long. They keep tightening the control on our firearms more and more. Pretty soon only criminals will have firearms....it's a sad state of affairs
Re:Not about gay marriage (Score:2)
I only hope that the gun owners in this country don't ignore the possibility, and do whatever they can to remind their representatives that we are here and we do know how to read the Constitution, even if they have forgotten.